Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.99
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal NUKHBATUL 'ULUM : Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam WAHATUL MUJTAMA: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat AL-KHIYAR: Jurnal Bidang Muamalah dan Ekonomi Islam AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab
Rafi, Irsyad
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam Dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar
Religion Humanities Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab

 1 
Analisis Ijtihad ʻAbdullah Bin ʻAbbās pada Masalah ‘Aul dan Radd dalam Fikih Mawārīṡ: Analysis of the Ijtihad of ʻAbdullah Bin ʻAbbās on the Issues of ‘Aul and Radd in Fiqh Mawārīs Suleha, Suleha; Rahmat, Rahmat; Irsyad Rafi
AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab Vol. 3 No. 4 (2024): AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/qiblah.v3i4.1645

Abstract

The aim of this research is to analyze the ijtihad (jurisprudential reasoning) of ʻAbdullah bin ʻAbbās regarding the issues of ‘Aul and Radd within the context of Islamic inheritance law (fikih mawāriṡ). This study employs a literature review method (library research) with a normative juridical approach, seeking legal sources through evidence from the Qur’an, the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad (hadith), and the opinions of scholars. The findings of the research indicate that the concept of ‘Aul serves as a mechanism to adjust inheritance portions when the total specified in the Qur’anic verses exceeds the actual available estate. On the other hand, the concept of Radd involves distributing the surplus of the estate to specific heirs after the primary distribution. ʻAbdullah bin ʻAbbās's ijtihad rejects the application of ‘Aul, arguing that adjusting inheritance portions is unnecessary based on his interpretation of Qur’anic verses. Regarding Radd, he opines that the surplus should not be given to spouses and grandmothers due to kinship reasons. His stance against ‘Aul does not guarantee fairness in inheritance distribution, a fundamental principle in Islamic law, unlike Radd which ensures a fair distribution and upholds the rights of specified heirs as prescribed by Shariah. Excluding grandmothers from receiving Radd inheritance is seen as inadequate in considering the principles of justice and balance in Islamic inheritance law, as grandmothers are among the heirs of aṣḥāb al-furūḍ through familial ties, distinct from spouses who inherit through marital relations. This research aims to contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of Islamic inheritance law (Fikih Mawārīṡ) and serve as a reference for future studies.
Tinjauan Fikih Jinayah Terhadap Konsekuensi Zina dalam KUHP Tahun 1946 dan No. 01 Tahun 2023: A Review of Islamic Criminal Jurisprudence on the Consequences of Adultery in the 1946 Criminal Code and No. 01 of 2023 Yasdin, Aditya Renaldi; Rapung, Rapung; Irsyad Rafi
AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab Vol. 3 No. 4 (2024): AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/qiblah.v3i4.1655

Abstract

This research aims to understand the Islamic perspective and the laws related to the definition of adultery, as well as a review of jinayah jurisprudence on the consequences of adultery in the Criminal Code of 1946 and No. 01 of 2023. This research is qualitative with a normative juridical approach, using library research methods by collecting books or references related to the research. The results show that, first, adultery in the perspective of jinayah jurisprudence has a different definition from Article 284 of the 1946 Criminal Code, which considers adultery as intercourse committed only by those who are married. Meanwhile, adultery according to Article 411 of the 2023 Criminal Code has the same meaning as the perspective of jinayah jurisprudence, which is intercourse committed by those who are either married or unmarried. Second, the review of jinayah jurisprudence on the consequences of adultery in the 1946 Criminal Code and No. 01 of 2023 is not accepted, because the imposition of sanctions for the crime of adultery must consider stronger evidence. Jinayah jurisprudence differentiates the consequences of adultery into two: stoning for those who are married, and one hundred lashes and one year of exile for those who are not married. The 1946 Criminal Code punishes perpetrators of adultery with a maximum prison sentence of 9 months for those who are married. Meanwhile, Article 411 does not differentiate the marital status of the perpetrator and punishes with a maximum prison sentence of 1 year or a fine of up to 10 million rupiahs. In the case of cohabitation, the penalty is a maximum of 6 months in prison or a fine of up to 10 million rupiahs. If adultery is committed with a family member, the prison sentence can reach 10 years. This research provides insights for students and the public about the limits and legal consequences of adultery from the perspective of jinayah jurisprudence and the Criminal Code.
Mekanisme Mekanisme Pengangkatan Penjabat Kepala Daerah Perspektif Imam al-Mawardi (Studi Permendagri No 4 Tahun 2023): Mechanism for Appointing Regional Heads al-Mawardi Perspective (Study of Permendagri Number 4 Year 2023) Tahir, Muhammad Ilham; Asri, Asri; Irsyad Rafi
AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab Vol. 3 No. 4 (2024): AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/qiblah.v3i4.1660

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze Imam al-Mawardi's perspective on the concept of the appointment mechanism for regional heads based on the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 4 of 2023. This research is a library research using a juridical-normative approach. The results of this study indicate that the mechanism for appointing regional heads is regulated in the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 4 of 2023 as a follow-up to the Constitutional Court Decision Number 15/PUU-XX/2022, which states that the President, as the highest leader, decides the acting governors after proposing six candidates, and the Minister of Home Affairs decides the acting regents and mayors after proposing nine candidates. The appointment of these regional heads aims to fill 271 vacant regional head positions due to the postponement of regional elections. According to al-Mawardi, the appointment of regional heads is carried out by the caliph and can also be done by the wazir tafwidī as the caliph's representative. The results of this study show that the concept of the appointment mechanism for regional heads carried out by the President and the Minister of Home Affairs is in line with Imam al-Mawardi's perspective. However, the appointment of regional heads due to special conditions caused by the postponement of regional elections contradicts Imam al-Mawardi's perspective, as the appointment of regional heads is the duty of a caliph and the wazir tafwidī, not by the entire population. The contribution of this study provides insights into the mechanism for appointing regional heads from Imam al-Mawardi's perspective and serves as a reference for the government to consider the concept of direct appointment of regional heads, as the direct election system is prone to causing conflicts within the community
Penitipan Orang Tua di Panti Sosial dalam Tinjauan Maqāṣid Syarī’ah (Studi Kasus di Sentra Gau Mabaji Gowa): Caring for the Elderly in Social Institutions in Review of Maqāṣid Syarī'ah (Case Study at Gowa Gau Mabaji Center) M. Kasim; Irsyad Rafi; Agi Ihza
AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/qiblah.v4i3.2181

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: Pertama, bagaimana peran panti sosial Sentra Gau Mabaji Gowa. Kedua, bagaimana efektifitas panti sosial Sentra Gau Mabaji Gowa terhadap penitipan orang tua. Ketiga, bagaimana hukum penitipan orang tua di panti sosial dalam tinjauan maqa>s}id syari>’ah. Metode penelitian yang dilakukan adalah penelitian lapangan kualitatif (field research) dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis/normatif yaitu pendekatan yang berfokus pada norma dan tujuan keagamaan yang bersumber dari hukum Islam dan pendekatan sosiologis/sosial yaitu pendekatan yang pembahasannya terletak pada suatu objek yang dilandaskan pada masyarakat. Hasil penelitian yang dapat disimpulkan dari pengkajian buku-buku dan beberapa wawancara di Sentra Gau Mabaji Gowa adalah sebagai berikut. Pertama, panti sosial Sentra Gau Mabaji Gowa memiliki peran yang sangat besar dalam mengatasi persoalan-persoalan terkait Penyandang Masalah Kesejahteraan Sosial (PMKS) khususnya para lansia dengan melakukan penampungan, assessment dan pengkajian terhadap persoalan yang terjadi antara para orang tua lanjut usia dengan anak ataupun keluarganya. Kedua, panti sosial Sentra Gau Mabaji Gowa memiliki efektifitas yang sejalan dengan tujuan hukum syariat (maqa>s}id syari>’ah), yaitu panti sosial berupaya untuk menjaga jiwa lansia (h}ifz} al-Nafs) serta berusaha memenuhi kebutuhan para lansia baik yang bersifat primer, sekunder maupun tersier dengan berbagai macam pelayanan fisik, kesehatan, psikososial terapi dan spiritual yang diberikan. Ketiga, hukum asal menitip orang tua lanjut usia di panti sosial adalah haram. Tetapi, status hukum itu dapat dinaikkan dari haram menjadi makruh jika terdapat uzur, seperti seorang anak yang dikhawatirkan akan menghardik dan membangkang terhadap perintah orang tuanya yang menyebabkan ia akan durhaka kepada orang tuanya, kondisi ekonomi anak yang sangat sulit yang dapat menyebabkan tidak terpenuhinya kebutuhan orang tuanya sehingga dikhawatirkan orang tua tersebut tidak terurus dan terlantar, faktor kesibukan anak yang menyebabkan ia tidak memiliki waktu untuk merawat dan memenuhi kebutuhan orang tuanya. Status hukum itu dapat dinaikkan dari haram menjadi mubah (boleh) jika terdapat alasan yang dibenarkan, seperti keadaan kesehatan jasmani maupun akal anak yang sakit yang pada dasarnya ia juga membutuhkan perawatan sehingga dikhawatirkan ia tidak dapat mengurus orang tuanya bahkan ia dapat menyakiti orang tuanya dan keinginan orang tua itu sendiri yang menginginkan untuk tinggal di panti sosial dengan alasan-alasan tertentu.
Co-Authors Agi Ihza Alya Namirah Anugrah, Anugrah Asri asri Aswanto Muhammad Takwi Hede Azwar, Azwar Fatimah Fatimah Jahada Mangka Khaerul Aqbar La Ode Ismail Ahmad M. Kasim Mahmuddin, Ronny Mochammad Imron Awalludin Rachmat Bin Badani Tempo Rachmat Bin Badani Tempo Rahmat Rahmat Rapung, Rapung Suleha, Suleha Tahir, Muhammad Ilham Yasdin, Aditya Renaldi