Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
15.293
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Wahana Didaktika EDUNOMIC : JURNAL ILMIAH PENDIDIKAN EKONOMI FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN Infotech Journal Biomedical Journal of Indonesia Jurnal DIDIKA: Wahana Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Jurnal Ibriez : Jurnal Kependidikan Dasar Islam Berbasis Sains Sawala : Jurnal Administrasi Negara al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies IKRA-ITH Informatika : Jurnal Komputer dan Informatika Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Esteem Journal of English Study Programme JKIE (Journal Knowledge Industrial Engineering) IKRA-ITH ABDIMAS Jurnal Pengabdian Magister Pendidikan IPA El Midad : Jurnal Jurusan PGMI Jurnal TAMBORA Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton Jurnal Teknik dan Informatika Journal Civics and Social Studies Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal International Journal of Recent Technology and Applied Science (IJORTAS) IJOEP : International Journal of Ecophysiology Sistema: Jurnal Pendidikan Journal Sport Science, Healt and Tourism of Mandalika (Jontak) JURNAL PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT CAHAYA MANDALIKA (ABDIMANDALIKA) Bulletin of Computer Science Research Journal of Informatics Management and Information Technology Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) KARYA: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Mejuajua Jurnal Ranah Publik Indonesia Kontemporer (Rapik) Jurnal Akutansi Manajemen Ekonomi Kewirausahaan (JAMEK) International Journal of Social Science, Educational, Economics, Agriculture Research, and Technology (IJSET) AJAD : Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Indonesian Journal of Islamic History and Culture JCOMENT (Journal of Community Empowerment) Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (SOKO GURU) Agrifarm Jurnal Informatika Teknologi dan Sains (Jinteks) Journal Transformation of Mandalika Al Burhan: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu dan Pengembangan Budaya Al-Qur'an Bidik : Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Nasional Teknologi Komputer Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hasil Pengabdian Masyarakat (JURIBMAS) Lambda: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA dan Aplikasinya TAKSONOMI International Review of Practical Innovation, Technology and Green Energy (IRPITAGE) Borneo : Journal of Islamic Studies Mega Buana Journal of Nursing ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Hexagon Jurnal Manajemen Sistem Informasi Jurnal Pengabdian Ibnu Sina Badranaya: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan dan Politik Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE JT-IBSI (Jurnal Teknik Ibnu Sina) Morfologi : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra dan Budaya Belalek Majority Science Journal As-Sakinah : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Jurnal Armada Pendidikan Acta Law Journal Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Jurnal Geologi dan Sumberdaya Mineral (Journal of Geology and Mineral Resources) Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology Legalis : Journal of Law Review The Indonesian Journal of Computer Science Jurnal Pendidikan & Pengajaran INERSIA Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Ilmu Komunikasi Jurnal Media Komunikasi Amwaluna: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah Jurnal Manajemen dan Akuntansi (JAME) Computer Journal El-Hikmah Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah dan Komunikasi Jurnal Edulanguage: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Journal of Civil Engineering and Environmental (J-Cental)
Hermansyah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 134 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search
Journal : Legalis : Journal of Law Review

 1 
Revisiting Criminal Justice: From Retribution to Restoration in a Technological Era Hermansyah
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): April 2025
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v3i2.792

Abstract

This narrative review explores contemporary challenges and reform trends in comparative criminal justice systems, emphasizing the interaction between retributive and restorative approaches and the integration of digital technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI). The study aimed to identify effective reform strategies and the systemic factors influencing their success. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across Scopus, Google Scholar, and other academic databases using Boolean operators to locate studies published in the last ten years, with inclusion criteria focusing on relevance, methodology, and language. Selected studies included qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research examining judicial systems in civil and common law countries. Results reveal that reform efforts are significantly shaped by institutional transparency, civic engagement, and corruption control. Countries like Rwanda and Germany demonstrated progress through inclusive reforms, whereas developing nations such as Indonesia face obstacles due to institutional limitations. Retributive models, particularly in the United States, contribute to high recidivism and neglect victims' needs. In contrast, restorative practices in Canada and New Zealand show enhanced outcomes in offender rehabilitation and victim satisfaction. Moreover, the use of AI in judicial systems, while improving efficiency, raises ethical concerns regarding algorithmic fairness and data governance. The findings highlight the urgent need for balanced policy frameworks that promote restorative justice, community engagement, and ethical integration of technology. Future research should examine adaptive models of justice reform suited to varying socio-political environments to enhance justice delivery globally.
Legal Innovations and Barriers in Climate Change Litigation: A Global Narrative Review Hermansyah
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): October 2025
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v3i4.794

Abstract

This narrative review explores the evolving landscape of climate change litigation and its intersection with environmental justice. The study aims to analyze legal innovations, structural barriers, and community participation in global climate litigation, with a particular focus on the integration of human rights frameworks. Literature was retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, JSTOR, and HeinOnline using targeted keywords and Boolean combinations. Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed studies and legal analyses discussing litigation, human rights, and environmental justice.Findings reveal a significant rise in legal innovations, including the judicial recognition of environmental rights and the application of intergenerational equity. Human rights-based litigation has influenced courts to mandate stronger climate action, especially in Europe and Latin America. However, substantial structural and institutional barriers remain, such as procedural limitations and weak institutional capacity, particularly in developing countries. Civic engagement and community-generated evidence emerged as key drivers in legitimizing claims and shaping litigation outcomes. Comparative analysis illustrates that while developed nations benefit from robust legal systems, emerging innovations in Africa and Latin America also contribute to transformative environmental governance. The study concludes that climate litigation serves as a critical tool for enforcing environmental accountability. It calls for systemic reforms to strengthen access to justice, integrate legal outcomes into policymaking, and expand participatory legal frameworks. Further research should assess the durability of legal precedents and the broader socio-political impacts of litigation.
Transitional Justice and Sustainable Peace: Comparative Insights and Policy Implications Hermansyah
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): October 2025
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v3i4.796

Abstract

Transitional justice plays a pivotal role in restoring peace and accountability in societies emerging from conflict. This narrative review explores the mechanisms employed across various post-conflict settings, aiming to understand their effectiveness and contextual relevance. Using systematic literature search methods across databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, the review analyzed peer-reviewed articles, research reports, and gray literature published within the last decade. Boolean search strategies and specific inclusion criteria were applied to identify studies focused on formal legal structures, community-based practices, gendered experiences, economic reparations, environmental considerations, and cross-national comparisons. The findings reveal that while international tribunals contribute to legal precedent, their detachment from local realities often limits community impact. Truth and Reconciliation Commissions (TRCs) have helped articulate historical grievances, but their effectiveness depends heavily on political will and institutional support. Informal mechanisms rooted in local culture offer promising pathways for healing and legitimacy, especially when integrated with civil society participation. Gender-sensitive approaches enhance justice outcomes by addressing violence against women and ensuring female representation. Furthermore, economic and environmental justice are increasingly recognized as integral to sustainable post-conflict recovery. Comparative cases from Timor Leste, Guatemala, and Bosnia highlight the importance of local engagement and context-specific adaptation of global frameworks. This study emphasizes the urgency of systemic reforms, inclusive policy-making, and long-term investments in justice mechanisms. It advocates for further research to overcome methodological challenges and supports multi-level strategies that center on community empowerment and resilience.
International Humanitarian Law under Pressure: Legal Responses to 21st Century Armed Conflicts Hermansyah
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): January 2024
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v2i1.805

Abstract

This narrative review explores the evolution of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in the context of contemporary armed conflicts, focusing on five key areas: technological innovation, gender-based protection, humanitarian intervention, urban warfare, and non-state actors. The study begins by framing the urgency to reevaluate IHL as conflicts become increasingly complex due to technological advancement and hybrid threats. The literature was collected from databases such as Scopus and Google Scholar using specific keywords including "autonomous weapons," "urban warfare regulations," and "non-state actors in armed conflict." Peer-reviewed articles published from 2000 onwards formed the basis of the analysis. The results reveal multiple gaps between existing legal frameworks and the realities on the ground. Technological developments such as drones and AI challenge core principles of distinction and proportionality. Gender-focused instruments like CEDAW and UNSC Resolution 1325 have enhanced protections but suffer from inconsistent implementation. The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine introduces ethical and legal tensions regarding sovereignty, with mixed success in cases like Libya and Rwanda. Urban warfare and sieges demonstrate IHL's difficulty in regulating densely populated battlegrounds. Non-state actors complicate legal accountability due to their diverse structures and cross-border operations. The discussion emphasizes the role of systemic legal constraints and advocates for reforms that reflect current military practices. This review concludes that advancing legal adaptability, international cooperation, and contextualized policy interventions is vital to ensure effective civilian protection and uphold humanitarian norms in modern warfare.
Bridging Law and Practice in Natural Resource Governance: A Narrative Review Hermansyah
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): October 2024
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v2i4.806

Abstract

Legal frameworks for natural resource governance play a critical role in determining equitable access, sustainable use, and environmental protection. This study aims to synthesize current research on legal structures governing natural resources, with a particular focus on marginalized communities in developing countries. A narrative review approach was employed, utilizing scholarly databases such as Scopus and Google Scholar. Boolean keyword combinations including "legal framework," "natural resource governance," and "sustainability" guided the literature search, while inclusion and exclusion criteria ensured relevance and rigor. Findings show that legal systems vary widely across jurisdictions, yet common patterns emerge: insufficient public participation, weak enforcement, and fragmented regulations often limit the effectiveness of natural resource laws. Case studies from Brazil, Bangladesh, Ghana, and Thailand illustrate the disconnect between policy intent and implementation, especially in protecting the rights of indigenous and local communities. Moreover, legal ambiguity and institutional weaknesses contribute to conflict over land and water resources. Discussion reveals that systemic issues—corruption, limited institutional capacity, and political inertia—continue to undermine the legal empowerment of marginalized stakeholders. To address these challenges, the review suggests policy reforms emphasizing participatory governance, community-based resource management, and integration of local knowledge. Ultimately, bridging the gap between theory and practice in legal resource governance requires both international cooperation and local legal innovation to achieve sustainability and justice.
Procedural Justice in Housing: The Impact of Legal Safeguards on Eviction Outcomes for Low-Income Renters Hermansyah
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): July 2025
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v3i3.1125

Abstract

Housing insecurity and eviction disproportionately impact low-income renters, undermining social and economic stability. This study assesses the effectiveness of procedural legal protections—specifically the right to counsel and the proportionality test—in reducing eviction rates across jurisdictions. Grounded in international human rights frameworks such as the ICESCR and UN-Habitat guidelines, the research investigates whether codified procedural safeguards correspond with lower levels of involuntary displacement. Using a panel Difference-in-Differences (DiD) design, the study analyzes data from the Eviction Lab (U.S.), OECD Affordable Housing Database, and a custom legal protections index. Comparisons were made between jurisdictions with and without procedural safeguards, controlling for unemployment, rent inflation, and urban density. Results show that right-to-counsel statutes significantly reduce eviction filings—by up to 60% in cities like New York and San Francisco (2013–2020). Proportionality tests were also linked to improved housing outcomes, particularly when integrated into broader legal frameworks. Subgroup analyses reveal that informal tenants and racial minorities benefit less unless explicitly covered by law. The effectiveness of these protections depends heavily on enforcement capacity and the availability of legal aid. The study concludes that procedural legal protections are vital policy tools for advancing housing justice. To maximize their impact, legal reforms must extend beyond codification to include inclusive design, public awareness, and strong institutional enforcement. These findings contribute to housing law and social policy by empirically demonstrating the role of legal safeguards in preventing eviction and promoting tenure security.
Breaking Default Bias: How Regulatory Choice Architecture Shapes Competition in Platform Ecosystems Hermansyah
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): July 2025
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v3i3.1126

Abstract

This article examines how default bias and switching frictions reinforce platform dominance and whether regulatory interventions can reduce these barriers. The research employs a difference-in-differences framework combined with event-study analysis to measure the causal effects of DMA obligations on user switching. Data sources include browser adoption statistics, app store analytics, and compliance monitoring reports from the European Commission. Key outcome variables include browser switching rates, alternative browser market shares, and adoption of link-out billing systems. The introduction of DMA choice screens resulted in a marked increase in consumer switching, with browser switching rates rising from 8.5% to 13.2%, demonstrating the policy’s effectiveness in breaking consumer inertia associated with defaults and alternative browser shares increasing from 19.6% to 24.5%. Link-out billing adoption grew from 2.1% to 8.3%. Cross-country heterogeneity reveals that countries with high digital literacy and strong infrastructure, such as Germany and the Netherlands, saw stronger switching effects compared to southern European countries with entrenched default reliance. The discussion highlights the role of behavioral economics in designing effective choice screens, the challenges posed by dark patterns, and the comparative advantages of interoperability mandates over structural remedies in fostering sustained competition. The analysis underscores that interoperability lowers switching costs, enhances contestability, and incentivizes platforms to innovate, thereby benefiting consumers and promoting long-term market dynamism. The study concludes that ex ante regulatory mandates under the DMA are effective in reducing consumer lock-in and reshaping digital market dynamics. However, regulatory vigilance is essential to prevent circumvention through manipulative design practices. The findings contribute to ongoing policy debates on digital regulation, emphasizing the need for adaptive, user-centered governance frameworks that balance competition, innovation, and consumer welfare.
Grave Risk and the Right to Return: A Comparative Study of Judicial Responses to International Child Abduction Hermansyah
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): April 2025
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v3i2.1127

Abstract

This article analyzes the application of the grave risk exception under Article 13(1)(b) of the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, comparing approaches in the United States, the European Union, and the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH). With international child abduction cases increasing by about 35% over the past two decades (HCCH, 2021), courts face growing tension between ensuring the prompt return of children and safeguarding their welfare. The study employs a comparative doctrinal and case study methodology, examining legal texts, jurisprudence, and soft-law instruments such as the HCCH Guide to Good Practice, complemented by empirical data from the HCCH Statistical Study (2021) and regional reports. Findings reveal marked divergence across jurisdictions. U.S. courts apply a high evidentiary threshold and defer to trial-level findings, prioritizing return obligations. EU courts, guided by Brussels II bis, integrate structured timelines and protective measures to mitigate potential harm. The HCCH, through soft-law harmonization, encourages consistent interpretation, though implementation remains uneven. Protective tools—such as mirror orders and supervised contact—are most effective when supported by enforceable judicial mechanisms. The article concludes that achieving consistency in grave risk assessments requires legal harmonization, judicial education, and stronger cross-border enforcement frameworks. Policy recommendations include standardized evaluation protocols, enhanced training for judges, and international cooperation to align legal practices with the child’s best interests.
Judging the Climate: Comparative Human Rights Approaches to Climate Litigation in Global Courts Hermansyah
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): January 2025
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v3i1.1132

Abstract

Climate change increasingly threatens fundamental human rights, prompting courts worldwide to intervene where legislative and executive actions fall short. This article examines how climate litigation enforces human rights obligations through judicial mechanisms, focusing on landmark rulings in Switzerland, India, and the United States. Using a mixed-methods approach that combines comparative doctrinal analysis and an empirical panel dataset (2015–2025), the study tracks litigation frequency, rights-based victories, and climate law intensity across jurisdictions. Findings show that courts are progressively recognizing climate-related rights and issuing binding decisions mandating state action. In KlimaSeniorinnen v. Switzerland, the ECtHR found that weak climate policy violated the right to private life; India’s Supreme Court affirmed environmental protection as a constitutional right in Ranjitsinh; and the Montana Supreme Court upheld youth rights in Held v. Montana. The data indicate a positive correlation between strong legal frameworks and successful litigation, leading to policy reforms and cross-border influence in legal reasoning. Despite significant progress, enforcement remains constrained by political resistance and limited administrative capacity. Civil society continues to play a vital role in promoting accountability and bridging implementation gaps. Overall, rights-based climate litigation is transforming climate governance by embedding human rights principles within environmental adjudication, signaling an emerging global legal consciousness that strengthens both environmental protection and justice.
Co-Authors AA Sudharmawan, AA Ab, Fitrawati Abbar, Habib Muhammad Abdillah, Tomi Abdurahman, Irfan Abunawas Ade Salma Renati Kasongat Ade Suherman Ade Suherman Adi Mawardin Adijaya, Nuryansyah Adlimi, Arsil Agus Saiful Arifin Al-Jabbar, Habib Muhammad Alifia Syadira Tasyah Alisa, Nur Amalia Khoirunisa Amanan Ana Maulana, Ana Anas Djumati Andi Andi Andysah Putera Utama Siahaan Anggi Anggraini, Anggi Anggun Kurniati Anggun Mahesti Anwar Sadat Ardianti, Suji Ardianto Arief Ichwani Armansyah Putra, Armansyah Asmal, Adhitama Asti Veto Mortini Aswadi Jaya Aswadi Jaya, Aswadi ASWANDI Aththorick, T Alief Atni, Oky Kusuma Atthia Rizki Wisista Aurel Margaretha Azainil Azainil Azhary Noersidiq Azmen Kahar Bahar, Asriyanti Baharuddin baraq noor, rustam Berliani, Kaniwa Budi Tjahjono Cacha Handika Darojat, Arik Dayana, Indri De Budi Irwan Taofik Demmy Dharma Bhakti Denni, Irdam Dewi Marini Dewi Masitha Dian Merissa Dikarsa, Asep Anggi Djafar, Tanwir Dwi Susanti Dwiyono, Yudo Eel Lestari Efendi , Fadilah Intan Ega Saiful Subhan Erma Suryani Ervana, Lina Eti Kurniati, Eti etti sartina siregar Fachri, Barany Fachry, Anwar Fadilah, Muhamad Akbar Fadlan Siregar, Muhammad Fajrig Arsyelan Febriadi, Sandy Rizki Feby Amelia Fitri, Hidayatul Franciakus Antonius Alijoyo Frilla Degustia Habib Satria Habib Satria Haerunnisah Hanafi, M. Ali Handayani, Ninik Hans Atanta Ginting Hanum Lestari Ningsih Hasriani Haykal Zulfadli Hendry Gunawan Heni Wulandari Herlina Hermanto, Odang Hesti Wahyuningsih Husaini Husda Hyeong Soo Kim I Gusti Lanang Media Idwan, Harry Ilham Maulana Imam Sutanto Indawan, Isnanda Indra Sanjaya Indriaty Ine Kris Damayanti Iqbal, Taufiq iraoctaagustiani Irwanto, Muhammad Ismail Jamal Jamaluddin Jaya, Baso Hendra Jefriyan Putra Deska Jusoh, Muzzammil Juswandi Kasim Khozin, Khozin Laili Komariyah, Laili Leni Marlina Lili Hastuti Lina, Ramlani Lubis, Putri Amelia Lutfiah M. Syukri M.Luthfi Fatturakhman Mahmud Maizana, Dina Manan, Nuraini A. Mansyur Mardhatillah, Siti Marwansyah Maskur Maulidin Maya Nachida Mega Fitri Hertini Mega Prasrihamni Melati, Prima Mitra Musika Lubis Moh. Taqiuddin Muh. Prasetyo Nugroho Muhamad Hadi Arfian Muhamad Hendrawan Muhamad Trisno Muhammad Althof Fauzan Zain Muhammad Aqil Muhammad Naufal, Muhammad Muhammad Rafi Habibi Muhammad Reagan Muhammad Reza Fahlefi Muhammad Takdir Muhithon Mustakim Mulyati Mungkin, Moranain Murjainah Mursak Muslim Mutiara NAELA HARDIANTI Nasution, Ahmad Luthfi Abdillah Nasywa Farhanah Izan Nattapong Rattanakosin Nguyen Thi Minh Trang Nizirwan Anwar Noryani, Noryani Nugroho, M. Prasetyo Nurani, Sutra Nuranisa Nurdin Nuriyati, Rifa Nurlaili Nursia Nurul Azmi Saragih Nurwijayanti Oscar Yanuarianto, Oscar Pardosi, Sinta R Phạm Van Dung Prima Melati Puspita Sari, Mega Putra, Randi Rian Putri Hardini, Siti Sugesti Putri Muthia Putri, Syofianna Qadrifa, Sabrina Sofi Qorry Pramesti Regita Cahyani Rachim, Rossa Rikha Putri Rachman, Irna Ningsi Amalia RACHMAT HIDAYAT Raden Teddy Iswahyudi Rahmatillah Rahmawati Ramadani Barus, Cici Rana Intan Ratna Yulika Go Resi Apriza Ridho, M. Rika Oktaviani ririnparamita Riska Ananda Natasya RIZHARDI, RURY Romi Aprianto Ruhamah Ruhamah Ruly Dwi Arista Rury Rizhardi Rusmawan, Chevi Ardiana Safina Meilia Safira Mustaqilla Saladin, Khairani Samsudin Sapendi Saputra, Ismed Eko Hadi Saputra, Surya Pratama Rajaban Sawiyah Siagian, Lailan Setiawan, Endry Setiono, Ranto Setyaningrum, Vidya Shalama Qoalam Siagian , Parulian Sigit Maryanto Siregar, Muhammad Fadlan Siti Hadianti, Siti Soa, Alfonsus Hendri Sofyan, Anas Sri Ismawati Subakti Subata, Latansa Sudirman Suharli, Suharli Suheri Suminar , Retna Supiyandi Supiyandi Supriadi Surya Darma SURYANTI Susila, Aceng Ahmad Rodian Suthida Chantavhong Syafriwel, Syafriwel Syahru Ramadhan Syamsul Hidayat Dilaga, Syamsul Hidayat Syarif Fitriyanto Syarif Hasyim Azizurrahman Syarifoeddin, Elya Wibawa Syarifuddin Talenta Arta Deva Victoria Taqiuddin, Moh. Ternala Alexander Barus Thobroni Tika Ermita Wulandari Tri, Tri Rahayu Ramadhani Tugiman Ulum, Khoirul Vischa Mansyera Pratama Wahyu Sakti Gunawan Irianto Walidain, Sri Nurul Wardhana, Nyoman Dedi Kusuma Warman Widyawati, Eka WINATA, SATRIA ANANDA Winda Sari, Vina Yahya, Fahmi Yam Sasni Yayuk Kusumawati Yoga Tri Nugraha Yudho Wibowo Yulianda, Fikri Yusri, Iin Karmila Zainuddin Husainy Zainudin Zakaria, Zulkarnay Zaki, Alwan Ammar