Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search
Journal : Unes Law Review

Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penggelapan dalam Hubungan Kerja (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 90/Pid.B/2021/PN Bkt) Gafur, Abdul; Sukmareni, Sukmareni; Munandar, Syaiful
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.663

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan hakim dalam tindak pidana penggelapan dalam jabatan dan untuk mengetahui penerpan sanksi dalam putusan Nomor 90/Pid.B/2021/PN Bkt. Penelitian ini tertuju pada penelitian kepustakaan, mempelajari, mengkaji dan menjelaskan mengenai tindak pidana penggelapan dalam jabatan. Hasil dari penulisan ini menunjukan bahwa 1) pertimbangan hukum bahwa fakta-fakta dipersidangan sekaligus kesesuaian diantara keterangan saksi-saksi akan serta hal-hal yang meringankan dan hal-hal yang memberatkan akan mempengaruhi putusan Hakim. Dalam hal ini terdakwa Eka Sari panggilan Eka memang telah terbukti bersalah sesuai dengan pasal yang didakwakan oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum. 2) Terkait pertimbangan hukum oleh hakim terhadap pelaku tindak pidana penggelapan dalam hubungan kerja, nomor putusan 90/pid.B/2021/PN Bkt. Ini masih kurang tepat, karena sanksi pidana yang diterima terdakwa belum sebanding dengan jumlah kerugian materil yang diterima oleh cv merapi argo sejati. Dengan kerugian materil yang mencapai Rp. 87.092.000,- (delapan puluh juta Sembilan puluh dua ribu rupiah) dan kerugian non materil seperti nama baik perusahaan yang sudah dinilai menurun sehingga membuat perusahaan tersebut tutup sementara.
ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI PAYAKUMBUH NOMOR 4/Pid.Sus/2022/ PN Pyh DENGAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA TENTANG TINDAKAN PIDANA KONTEN ASUSILA LEWAT MEDIA WHATSAPP Okvania, Lastary; Yustrisia, Lola; Munandar, Syaiful
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.669

Abstract

Perbandingan putusan yang di keluarkan oleh hakim adalah hal yang sudah sering terjadi dalam peradilan di Indonesia. Perbedaan pendapat dan penafsiran Hukum membuat banyaknya perbedaan putusan pada tingkatan pengadilan. Hal ini terjadi pada putusan yang di keluarkan oleh Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Payakumbuh mengenai tindakan pidana konten asusila yang diputus tidak terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan bersalah melakukan tindak pidana, dibebaskan dari tahanan dan putusan Mahkamah Agung RI terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan bersalah melakukan tindak pidana dan terdakwa menjalani masa percobaan selama 4 (empat) bulan berakhir. Metode penelitian yang dipakai dalam penelitian ini adalah normatif yaitu penelitian hukum yang hanya ditujukan pada peraturan- peraturan tertulis sehingga penelitian ini sangat erat hubungannya pada perpustakaan karena akan membutuhkan data- data yang bersifat sekunder dari perpustakaan. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Pengadilan Negeri Payakumbuh penggunaan teknik pengumpulan data, yaitu studi dokumen. Data primer diperoleh dari penelitian dan data sekunder diperoleh dari berbagai literatur, peraturan, dokumen dan pendapat ahli yang relevan dengan pembahasan penulis ini. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini, dapat dipahami bahwa pertimbangan Majelis hakim dan hakim anggota mempengaruhi hasil putusan yang terbukti secara sah atau tidak dalam melakukan tindakan pidana yang dilakukan oleh Terdakwa.
Analisis Dakwaan atas Tindak Pidana Mendistribusikan Informasi Elektronik yang Melanggar Kesusilaan di Kejaksaan Negeri Padang Fitria, Wiza; Yustrisia, Lola; Munandar, Syaiful
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.765

Abstract

State institutions that exercise State power, especially in the field of prosecution, are called the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. The Prosecutor's Office is a body that has authority in law enforcement and justice, the Prosecutor's Office itself is led by the Attorney General, the High Prosecutor's Office and the District Attorney's Office which is an integral and inseparable whole. The indictment for the Public Prosecutor is the basis for proving Juridical Analysis, filing charges and legal remedies by the prosecutor. The type of research used is empirical juridical, which is research oriented to data collection at the location. As for the results of research on the consideration of the public prosecutor in making charges, the first thing that is done is in terms of case files, case files from investigators that have been declared complete by the investigating prosecutor are poured into the form of P-21. In the sense that the case file is declared complete because it has met the formal and material requirements. The public prosecutor uses the alternative indictment i.e. first, second or third, The alternative indictment is made in the form of an indictment that includes two or more several Articles that are placed the word "or" indicating the nature of the alternative, the public prosecutor still doubts what type of crime is actually appropriate to be charged. And give the judge the opportunity to choose one of the charges filed in the indictment
PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE OLEH KEJAKSAAN NEGERI PASAMAN TERADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA Roswari, Bunga; Sukmareni, Sukmareni; Munandar, Syaiful
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.772

Abstract

The application of restorative justice by the Pasaman District Prosecutor's Office to perpetrators of criminal acts of narcotics abuse is an approach in the criminal justice system that focuses on restoration, reconciliation and restoration of relationships damaged by criminal acts. The aim of this research is to examine the implementation of restorative justice by the Pasaman District Prosecutor's Office towards perpetrators of criminal acts of narcotics abuse using empirical juridical methods. The results of this research show that restorative justice for perpetrators of narcotics abuse has been implemented but is not optimal because there are still obstacles, based on Attorney General Regulation Number 18 of 2021 which can only be applied to narcotics addicts, narcotics abusers and victims of narcotics abuse, in the event that they are caught or arrested by the police, evidence of usage expires in one day and also the prosecutor must check whether the suspect is the final user (end user), check the suspect's profile in relation to financial transactions and the suspect's way of life (know your suspect), and must meet the requirements of the results The perpetrator's integrated assessment team tested positive for using narcotics. The obstacle faced by the prosecutor's office is because the prosecutor's office is not directly involved in the investigation process, so the prosecutor's office does not yet know whether the perpetrator can actually implement restorative justice or not, whether the perpetrator is really a narcotics addict, whether the evidence has been used up so The prosecutor's office must coordinate between sectors. And the effort to overcome the obstacles is by profiling or mapping, where the prosecutor's office must look at the perpetrator's legal status, user history, to his involvement in using the narcotics
Penyelesaian terhadap Tindak Pidana Begal yang dilakukan Oleh Anak di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Bukittinggi Erpendi, Andre Mulya; Sukmaren, Sukmaren; Munandar, Syaiful
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.856

Abstract

The background of this writing is based on the crime of robbery which is increasingly common in Indonesia, especially those committed by children, in this case of course there is a settlement process and the factors behind the child committing the crime of robbery. The purpose of this research is to find out the settlement process for the crime of robbery by children in decision Number 7/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN Bkt, and the factors that cause children to commit criminal acts of robbery in decision Number 7/Pid.Sus-Anak/ 2021/PN Bkt. The method used is sociological empirical, which is taken from the facts that exist in society. The technique used in collecting data is through interviews. Based on the results of the research, it can be found that the settlement of criminal acts of robbery committed by children in the jurisdiction of the Bukittinggi court is by carrying out a diversion effort, namely the transfer of child cases that are long and very rigid, but these efforts find no results and are continued with the juvenile justice system in accordance with the law and the applicable regulations are contained in Law number 11 of 2012. And the factors that cause children to commit criminal acts of robbery based on the results of interviews are sociological in nature, in the form of environmental and social factors, economic factors, educational factors, and parents of children.
Proses Penyidikan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Disertai Kekerasan Studi Kasus di Polres Agam Pandu Erlangga, Mahesa; Sukmareni, Sukmareni; Munandar, Syaiful
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.896

Abstract

Investigation is the stage of resolving a criminal case after an investigation, which is the initial stage of looking for the presence or absence of a criminal offense in an event. When it is known that a criminal offense has occurred, then that is when an investigation can be carried out based on the results of the investigation. In the act of investigation, the emphasis is placed on the act of searching and finding an event suspected of being a criminal act. Whereas in the investigation, the emphasis is placed on the act of searching and collecting evidence. Investigation aims to make light of the criminal offense found and also determine the perpetrator. This research is descriptive, which is research that aims to provide data that is as accurate as possible about the circumstances that are the object of research in this case about the investigation process against the perpetrators of the crime of gold robbery in the Agam Police area, so as to find answers to problems in the implementation of the investigation of criminal acts of theft accompanied by violence which was first carried out after receiving a report from the victim, namely processing the crime scene, asking for witness and victim testimony, after finding some preliminary evidence, several forced measures were taken, namely the arrest of the perpetrator, detention, and also confiscation. Investigations carried out by investigators play a role in uncovering or resolving a criminal offense. Therefore, investigators must improve their performance, so that they can complete the shortcomings in the investigation and can also overcome the obstacles that occur in the implementation of criminal investigations.