Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.517
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat Jurnal el-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Pranata Sosial Al-Manahij : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Jurnal El-Thawalib Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi El-Sirry: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Sosial Jurnal El-Thawalib
Sirait, Adi Syahputra
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi

 1 
JUAL BELI SUBSCRIBERS YOUTUBE PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM SIRAIT, ADI SYAHPUTRA; Tanjung, Dhiauddin
Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Vol 9, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/yurisprudentia.v9i1.7864

Abstract

This article aims to explain whether Subscribers and Viewers are part of the property and how the law of buying and selling is from the perspective of Islamic Law. The method used in this paper is normative empirical with a phenomenological approach. The technique used in collecting data in this article is by observing and tracing the buying and selling practices of viewers and subscribers in online buying and selling services. Then the data is analyzed using literature related to buying and selling (Fiqh Muamalah). The results of this study indicate that the sale and purchase of viewers and subscribers is the sale and purchase of tadlis which is prohibited in Islam because it contains elements of Gharar (uncertainty) both in the account sold by the seller because it is not owned or the benefits received by the buyer because it can decrease at any time. Meanwhile, viewer and subscriber buying and selling transactions that are permitted according to syara' law are carried out using aqad istisna' provided that the account is not for commercial use.
DAMPAK PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR : 18/PUU-XVII/2019 TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI JAMINAN FIDUSIA DAN HAK TANGGUNGAN PADA PERBANKAN SYARIAH DI INDONESIA Sirait, Adi Syahputra; Harahap, Muhammad Yadi
Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Vol 10, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/yurisprudentia.v10i1.10365

Abstract

AbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan mendeskripsikan bagaimana dampak pasca putusan mahkamah konstitusi nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 terhadap pelaksanaan eksekusi jaminan fidusia pada perbankan syariah di Indonesia. Tulisan ini mengggunakan metode penelitian empiris dengan pendekatan case approach. Sumber data yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah putusan pengadilan agama tentang eksekusi jaminan fidusia setelah adanya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa aturan eksekusi jaminan sebelum adanya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi menimbulkan pelanggaran dan kekerasan yang dilakukan oleh pihak kreditur dengan menggunakan debt kolektor, namun setelah adanya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi pelaksanaan eksekusi harus melalui Pengadilan, karena sengketa tersebut terjadi pada perbankan syariah, maka perkara tersebut menjadi wewenangnya Pengadilan Agama, dengan demikian dirasa lebih membeirkan jaminan dan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak. Kata Kunci : Jaminan Fidusia dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi AbstractThis article aims to find out and describe the impact of the post-constitutional court decision number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 on the implementation of fiduciary guarantees in sharia banking in Indonesia. This paper uses an empirical research method with a case approach. The data source used in this paper is the religious court decision regarding the execution of fiduciary guarantees following the Constitutional Court decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019. The results of the research show that the collateral execution rules before the Constitutional Court decision gave rise to violations and violence committed by creditors using debt collectors, but after the Constitutional Court decision the execution had to go through the Court, because the dispute occurred in sharia banking, the case became The authority of the Religious Courts is thus felt to provide more legal guarantees and certainty for the parties. Keynote : Fiduciary Guarantee and Constitutional Court Decisions
Co-Authors Ahmatnijar, Ahmatnijar Ariansyah, Yudi H, Kurniawan Harahap, Muhammad Yadi Harahap, Nurhotia Harahap, Risalan Basri Harahap, Syaiful Akhyar Hasibuan, Selli Mariyana Hsb, Putra Halomoan Ikhwanuddin Harahap Kurniawan, Puji Ma'mun, Sukron Mhd. Syahnan Nasution, Muhammad Arsad Pane, Ary Ananda Panjaitan, Budi Sastra Ramadhan, Nispu Siregar, Arnisa Tanjung, Dhiauddin Taufik Hidayat Wahidah Wahidah