Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law

Penegakan Hukum Administrasi Negara Terhadap Pengolahan Limbah Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun Industri Pengasapan Karet di Kota Jambi Fanny Inayah, Rts.; Budhiartie, Arrie; Mushawirya, Rustian
Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): Juni 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/mendapo.v3i2.13296

Abstract

This article discusses the Enforcement of State Administrative Law Against Hazardous Waste Treatment in the Crumb Rubber Industry in Jambi City. The purpose of this study was to determine the proper and proper mechanism for processing hazardous waste in the rubber smoking industry, in addition to knowing the government's legal actions against perpetrators of violations of hazardous waste processing in Jambi City. The research method used is empirical juridical, namely research that emphasizes in terms of observation, which seeks to observe legal facts that apply in society, where it requires knowledge to be observed and proven openly. The results of the study indicate that there is a conflict between das sollen and das sein regarding the treatment of B3 waste from the Rubber Smoking Industry in Jambi City in accordance with Jambi City regulations Number 7 of 2017 which states that the location for storing B3 waste is required to be free from flooding and not prone to natural disasters. there are buildings that are rusty, emitting noise, vibration and also the smell produced by the B3 waste. Therefore, it is necessary for the government's role in the B3 waste treatment mechanism in accordance with applicable regulations and the government's role in providing administrative law enforcement against perpetrators of B3 Waste Treatment violations.
Kewenangan Pejabat Pengganti Kepala Daerah Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Daerah Dari Perspektif Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Wahyudi, Amar; Syam, Fauzi; Mushawirya, Rustian
Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022): Oktober 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/mendapo.v3i3.18714

Abstract

This research is motivated by the existence of inconsistencies in norms, ambiguity of norms, and differences in interpretation or designation of Substitute Regional Heads who are unable to carry out tasks. Regional Government Law and its differences with the authority of Substitute Officials in the Government Administration Law.”The research method”used”is normative research “using” (Statute Approach)”and (Conceptual Approach)”. Legal materials in this study include primary legal materials, secondary legal materials,”and tertiary legal materials. The”results “of this study”conclude that the Substitute Official Arrangement in the Government Administration Act actually only applies to the replacement of Administrative Positions so that it cannot be used to replace the Regional Head Position as a political position. There are only 2 types of Substitute Officials in the Government Administration Law, namely: (a) Daily Implementing Officers (Plh) and (b) Task Executing Officers (Plt). There are 4 types of Nomenclature of Substitute Officials in the Regional Government Law and its implementing regulations, namely: (a) Acting Regional Head (Plt KDH); (b) Acting Regional Head (Pj KDH); (c) Temporary Regional Head (Pjs KDH); and (d) Daily Implementing Regional Head (Plh KDH) It is hoped that later the relevant Government will issue a new regulation or explanatory regulation related to the Executing Tasks, Daily Executors, Temporary Acting and Acting.
Kedudukan Peradilan Pajak dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia: KEDUDUKAN PERADILAN PAJAK DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN DI INDONESIA Mushawirya, Rustian
Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Februari 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/mendapo.v5i1.31383

Abstract

This article was prepared against the background of the unclear position of the Tax Court in the judicial system in Indonesia. This research uses normative juridical methods which are supported by data collection techniques using library research intended to obtain secondary data. In conducting this research, the type of research used by the author is normative juridical, or also often called normative legal research. This type of research was chosen to obtain theoretical matters, principles, conceptions, legal doctrines, and legal rules related to the position of tax courts in the Indonesian judicial system. The problem studied in this research is the position of the Tax Court in the judicial system in Indonesia, and whether the tax dispute resolution mechanism according to Undang-Undang Nomor 14 of 2002 is in line with the principles of judicial power in Indonesia. This research uses a descriptive analytical method with a normative juridical approach supported by an empirical juridical approach. The data collection technique is to use library research intended to obtain secondary data. This data is also supported by using field studies as primary data. The research results show that the position of the Tax Court in the judicial power structure is a deviation from Pasal 24 Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.