Fenty Andriani
Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Ponorogo

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan

STUDI KRITIS BUKU AJAR PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM (PAI)  TINGKAT MADRASAH ALIYAH TERBITAN KEMENTERIAN AGAMA  TAHUN 2020 Rosidin, Rosidin; Mardhatillah, Masyithah; Andriani, Fenty; Addakhil, Abdul Rahman
Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan Vol 22 No 2 (2024): Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan Vol. 22 No. 2 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Center for Research and Development of Religious Literature and Heritage, Agency for Research and Development and Training, Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31291/jlka.v22i2.1273

Abstract

Previous studies have identified radical content in Islamic religious education (PAI) textbooks. However, no comprehensive examination of 12 PAI textbooks in Indonesian Islamic high schools (Madrasah Aliyah) has been conducted. This study aims to address two questions: (1) What forms of non-moderate interpretation threaten religious moderation? (2) What forms of moderate interpretation strengthen religious moderation? This qualitative study gathered data through documentation, interviews with PAI textbook authors, and discussions with PAI experts in scientific forums. Data were analyzed using an interactive model. The findings of this study identified three forms of non-moderate interpretations in PAI textbooks that threaten religious moderation: (1) Textual interpretations undermining national commitment (wataniyyah), obedience to legislation (dusturiyyah), and acceptance of tradition (urfiyyah); (2) Partial interpret­tations compro­mising equality (mubadalah), compassion (rahamutiyyah), and justice (adalah); (3) Monodimensional interpretations on benefit (maslahat), huma­nity (insaniyyah), and tolerance (tasamuh). Conversely, moderate interpret­a­tions that strengthen religious moderation include: (1) Contextual inter­pretations combining objective text meanings with rele­vant subjective contexts; (2) Holistic interpretations integrating compre­hensive understand­ing of the Qur'an through the maudu’i (thematic) method with collective expert validation (taqrir jama’i); (3) Multidimen­sional interpretations mer­ging insights from Islamic science experts (shar’i) with those from natural, social, and humanities sciences (kawni). The practical implications highlight the need for developing mufassir education programs to produce contextual interpretations, expanding scientific forums for holistic interpretations, and enhancing collaboration between shar’i and kawni experts for multidimen­sional interpretations