Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan)

The Positive Fictional Principle After the Implementation of The Job Creation Law: A Prophetic Legal Paradigm Pranoto, Edi; Sudarmanto, Kukuh
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 1: April 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v11i1.1168

Abstract

The positive fictitious principle in the Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation (CK Law) exists to facilitate investment and simplify licensing. However, the provisions in the CK Law, which exclude the role of the Administrative Court in fictitious applications have the potential to cause injustice and legal uncertainty in society. That research focuses on examining the positive fictitious principle's existence after the CK Law's enactment in the paradigm of prophetic law. The paradigm of prophetic regulation was chosen in this study as an effort to explore the theological (divine) and human dimensions in positive fictitious formulations as in CK Law. This research is a normative legal type of research with a concept and statutory approach. The results of the study confirm that in terms of the three aspects of prophetic law, namely transcendence, liberation, and humanization, the provisions of the CK Law, which no longer involve the role of the Administrative Court and have not issued Presidential Regulations regarding positive fiction can cause uncertainty and injustice in society. That makes the substance of the prophetic law in the positive fictitious provisions in the CK Law not be realized optimally. Orientation based on the prophetic legal paradigm in regulating the positive fictitious principle after regulation in the CK Law, according to the author, can be done by revising the positive fictitious provisions in the CK Law by returning the competence of the State Administrative Court.
Co-Authors Abidin Abidin Abraham, Feri Akbar Panggabean, Windro Alwan Hadiyanto Amalia Rachim, Zulfa Amri Panahatan Sihotang Chabib Faturrohman, Muhamad Cyzentio Chairilian, Muhammad Alvin Dadi, Mat Diah Sulistyani Ratna Sediati, Diah Sulistyani Edi Pranoto, Edi Ekowati, Nur Fristianti, Nadya Dhea Gunawan, Febrianto Hardiyanti, Lesha Jain, Vaibhav Kurniawan, Widhie Kusudarmanto, Ayu Melati Ratuningnagari Anisa Lestari, Rohmini Indah Mahendrayana, Indra Ashoka Manurung, Mangaraja Margono Margono Ma’arif, Samsul Miftah Arifin Muhammad Faizin Muhammad Junaidi Muhammad Junaidi Muhammad Nawir Mukhlis Ridwan Nababan, Agung Kristyanto Nahdhodin, Muhammad Nur, Fahroni Nursalam Nursalam Panahatan Sihotang, Amri Prasetiono, Yogi PRASETIYO, RUDI Prasetyorini, Theresia Eni Putri, Risqiana Sunaryo Rahadjo Puro, Djuhandhani Ratuningnagari, Ayu Melati Rian Ardiansyah, Maruf Said, Mochamad Saputra, Dimas Almeida Sarkanto, Sarkanto Satria Hilmi, Muhammad Septiandani, Dian Setyawati, Dewi Sihotang, Amri Panahatan Sipahutar, Apul Oloan Sirait, Paulus Siyogo, Siyogo Soegianto Soegianto Soegianto, Soegianto Sofi, Muhammad Sofyan, Safran Sofyan, Syafran Subiadi, Rilda sukarna, kadi Sukimin Sukrisno, Wijayono Hadi Sulistiyani, Diah Supriyanto Supriyanto Tanggono, Claustantianus Wibisono Tarantung, Yosep Tatara, Tirsa Triwati, Ani Triwiraputra, Ega Laksmana Urip Giyono Wahyu Nugroho Wahyuningsih, Ragil Wibisono, Dedi Indra Widyantara, Ambar Adi Widyantara Widyasari Rifki, Ika Wulandari, Rahajeng Zaenal Arifin Zaenal Arifin