Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kreativitas PKM MDP Student Conference Mutiara : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia
Gultom, Eva
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Mutiara : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia

 1 
The Representation of Argumentative Discourse in Doha Debates Mariana, Sitti Dina; gultom, Eva
Mutiara: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): JIMI - OKTOBER
Publisher : PT. PENERBIT TIGA MUTIARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61404/jimi.v1i2.17

Abstract

The study aims to analyze the argumentative process contained in the YouTube Channel Doha Debate with the title “Gender Equality (Full Debate) Doha debates presenting three spokespersons by using five principles based on Damer’s theory. The method used in this study is qualitative descriptive. Data has been collected in the analysis by way of presenting, describing, and interpreting data. Research results show that there are twelve data in in this study, such as structural principle (twelve data), relevance (ten data), acceptability (one Data), sufficiency (six data), and rebuttal principle (four data). The researcher found that the structural principle is most dominantly used in the argument because there is a claim from the speaker’s argument to strengthen the speaker’s statement so that it can be accepted by the audience, relevance of reasons that are directly related to the claim, acceptability of the audience's opinion regarding the speakers’ argument, sufficiency provides evidence to strengthen the argument, and rebuttal principle which is the speaker's criticism of the argument presented by the opponent. Therefore, this concluded that the most consistent during the debate was Randa saying that quotas can help gender equality while Christina said that quotas cannot work and only harm because there is no evidence that gender quotas can help equality.
Co-Authors Darmianto, Amok Heman Pailak Manik, Marisa Mariana, Sitti Dina Rumambi, Magda Saputra, Bima Adi septa lumbantoruan Sibuea, Renova Siregar, Deborah Suntoro Suntoro Tendean, Sandi