Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Amerta Nutrition

KETEBALAN LEMAK SUBKUTAN DENGAN KADAR HDL DAN LDL PADA MAHASISWI OVERWEIGHT DI PESANTREN: Pengaruh Ketebalan Lemak Subkutan terhadap Kadar HDL Dan LDL Mahasiswi Overweight Di Universitas Berbasis Pesantren Damayanti, Amilia Yuni; Fatimah, Fatimah; Luthfiya, Lulu'; Kusumadiastuti, Afina Deni
Amerta Nutrition Vol. 7 No. 2SP (2023): AMERTA NUTRITION SUPPLEMENTARY EDITION Special 3rd Amerta Nutrition Conferenc
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/amnt.v7i2SP.2023.13-17

Abstract

Background: Indonesia is now facing overweight problem as one of the major nutritional problems. It occurs due to excessive fat in the body. The distribution of body fat from subcutaneous fat can increase health risks such as dyslipidemia, one of which is characterized by abnormal High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) and Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) levels. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between subcutaneous fat thickness and HDL LDL levels in overweight students at Universitas Darussalam Gontor. Methods: This study used a cross-sectional design. The research subjects were 50 overweight adult women aged 18-25 years using the Lemeshow formula selected using consecutive sampling while the data analysis using the Chi-Square test. Data taken includes body fat percentage from measuring the thickness of subcutaneous fat folds using a skinfold caliper measuring instrument, and checking the lipid profile from HDL and LDL levels. Results: The average thickness of subcutaneous fat in overweight female students was 32% body fat with high category (64%). The average HDL level was classified as normal (70%), while the LDL level was classified as high (58%).  The results of the analysis test on the relation between subcutaneous fat thickness and HDL levels showed no significant difference with HDL levels (p-value = 0.199 [>0.05]). While there is a significant relationship between the subcutaneous fat thickness and LDL levels with a p-value of 0.042 (<0.05). Conclusions: There is no significant relationship between subcutaneous fat thickness and HDL level contrarily, there is a relationship between subcutaneous fat thickness and LDL levels. Monitoring the thickness of subcutaneous fat needs to be done as a form of controlling LDL levels.
Factors Affecting Abdominal Circumference in Adolescent Girls: Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh terhadap Lingkar Perut pada Remaja Putri Luthfiya, Lulu'; Pibriyanti, Kartika; Nabawiyah, Hafidhotun; Fathimah, Fathimah; Ummah, Safira Kholifatul
Amerta Nutrition Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): AMERTA NUTRITION (Bilingual Edition)
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/amnt.v8i1.2024.74-81

Abstract

Background: Central obesity was a health problem in Indonesia. One of indicator to find out central obesity was abdominal circumference. According to preliminary research, 28.4% of students had abdominal circumference >80 cm. Central obesity cause is multifactorial. Objectives: To identify factors related to abdominal circumference in adolescent girls. Methods: The design research was a cross-sectional. The total sample was 89 respondents, using the Lemeshow formula. The Sampling was taken by purposive sampling. The abdominal circumference data was measured by a metline. The percentage of body fat was analyzed with the Omron body fat analyzer. Food consumption patterns used Semi Quantitative Food Frequency (SQ-FFQ). Emotional overeating used the Adult Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (AEBQ), diet attitude, and oral control with the Eating Attitude Test (EAT)-26. The Data was analyzed by STATA 13 with the spearman test. Results: Relationship of BMI (p=0.000; r=0.677), percentage of body fat (p=0.000; r=0.56), kind of junk food (p=0.02; r=0.23). frequency of junk food (p=0.04; r=0.21), energy intake from junk food (p=0.0061, r=0.28), fat intake from junk food (p=0.018, r=0.24), total enery intake (p=0.036; r=0.222), total fat intake (p=0.01; r=0.24); total fiber (p=0.17; r=0.14); overeating (p=0.018, r=0.25); diet attitude (p=0.000; r=-0.52), and oral control (p=0.0001; r=0.39) with abdominal circumference. Conclusions: There was a relationship between BMI, body fat percentage, junk food consumption pattern (type, frequency, amount of intake and fat), energy intake, fat intake, emotional overeating, diet attitude, and oral control of the abdominal circumference. There was no significant relationship between fiber intake and abdominal circumference.