Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.405
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Literatus LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Yustitia Jurnal Literasi Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat
Purwandi, Agustri
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN

 1 
Constitutionalism and the Debate Surrounding the Suspension of the Advocates’ Association Lutfiadi, Lutfiadi; Wardani, Win Yuli; Heryanti, Febrina; Camelia, Noer Dini; Purwandi, Agustri
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.333

Abstract

The suspension of advocates’ Oath of Office (BAS) by the High Court raises significant concerns within the framework of Indonesian procedural law and state administration. The core issue stems from the absence of an explicit legal basis authorizing such action, which may contravene the principles of legality, constitutionalism, and the protection of advocates’ fundamental rights. This study aims to examine the legal legitimacy of the BAS suspension, evaluate its compliance with constitutional principles, and explore its philosophical implications for the role of advocates as law enforcers on a par with judges, prosecutors, and police officers. Employing a normative juridical approach with a focus on doctrinal analysis of the Advocates Law, the 1945 Constitution, relevant court decisions, and legal literature, the study finds that the BAS suspension constitutes an ultra vires act. Consequently, this measure undermines the rule of law, diminishes the independence of the legal profession, and has the potential to disrupt public access to justice, highlighting the need for more robust regulatory reforms.
Co-Authors ACHMAD RIFAI Arianti, Melisa Ariyanto, Rio Febri Camelia, Noer Dini Dwi CAS, Insana Melia Gatot Subroto Heryanti, Febrina Ismail, Mahsun Lutfiadi, Lutfiadi Mohammad Fahrur Rozi Pakendek, Adriana Pratama, M. Thoriq Maulidi R., Mohammad Ilham A. Royana, Dila Saputri, Arimurtika Fajariyah Sugeng, Santoso Suhaimi Suhaimi Wahyono, Sapto Wardani, Win Yuli Wulandari, Safitri