Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Engineering and Scientific Research (JESR)

The Performance Comparison of Battery Charging Using MPPT and PWM Controllers on Amorphous Solar Panel-Based E-Scooters Asrori, Asrori; Adiwidodo, Satworo; Faizal, Elka; Martawati, Mira Esculenta; Mardyansyah, AA
Journal of Engineering and Scientific Research Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Lampung Jl. Soemantri Brojonegoro No.1 Bandar Lampung, Indonesia 35141

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/jesr.v6i1.151

Abstract

Solar Panel-Based Electric Scooter (E-Scooter) is an electric vehicle in the form of a scooter that uses solar panels as a source of electrical energy for charging batteries and a BLDC motor as a wheel drive. With the development of the E-Scooter, it is necessary to know how to charge the battery. The purpose of this research is to determine the type of Solar Charge Controller (SCC) that can maximize battery charging on the E-Scooter. The research method is to compare SCC MPPT and SCC PWM. The research was conducted by monitoring the output current and voltage of the solar charger controller generated by the solar panels every 10 minutes. After that the recorded data will be stored in the monitoring device's storage memory for further processing. The results of the data that have been obtained on the e-scooter using the SCC MPPT type are capable of producing a power of 9.05 W with a current value of 0.33 A and a voltage of 27.47 V. Meanwhile, the PWM type SCC is capable of producing 8.22 W of power with a current value of 0.30 A and a voltage of 27.42 V. So that the MPPT type SCC is more economical than PWM for charging when the e-scooter is not moving. For the running conditions of the MPPT type SCC e-scooter is capable of producing 7.36 W of power with a current value of 0.27 A and a voltage of 27.26 V. Meanwhile, the PWM type SCC is capable of producing a current of 6.81 W with a value of 0.25 A and a voltage 27.24 V. So that the MPPT type SCC is more efficient than PWM for charging when the e-scooter is running.
Co-Authors Abdullah Helmy Ach. Muhib Zainuri Ach. Muhib zainuri Agus Harijono AGUS SETIAWAN Agus Sujatmiko Agus Sujatmiko Akhmad Faizin Ariani Ariani Asfari Hariz Santoso BAYU PRANOTO Cucuk Evi Lusiani Dani, Agus Dony Perdana Eko Naryono Eko Naryono Eko Yudiyanto Elka Faizal Eryk Eryk Faizal, Elka Faizul Ahmad Jatmiko FATHUR ROHMAN gumono Hari Rarindo Harie S. Jaya Harijono, Agus Haris Puspito Buwono Hilmi Iman Firmansyah Imam Mashudi IRWAN HERYANTO ERYK Irwan Heryanto/Eryk Jaya Harie Satiyadi Khalimatus Sa'diyah Kris Witono Kris Witono Kurnia, Arindrian Lisa Agustriyana Ludfi Setiawan Lulut W M Hasyim Nurwansyah M. Hilmi Syiva Afiat M. N. Wahyudi Abdullah M. Zusriansyah Fahrudin Harahap Mardyansyah, AA Martawati, Mira Esculenta Maskur Maskur Masramdhani Saputra Mira Esculenta Martawati Mira Esculenta Martawati Mirza Fathus Syifa Alfarisyi Moh. Hartono Mohammad Noor Hidayat Mohammad Noor Hidayat Mokhammad Khatami Muhamad Hanifudin Muhamad Zulvi Anam Muhammad Fakhruddin Nanang Qosim Novembrian Isam Dinata Nugroho Suharto Nugroho, Pipit Wahyu Nurhadi - Pondi Udianto Priya Surya Harijanto Putu Wijaya Sunu Qais Rakhmanda Yoga Pratama R.N. Akhsanu Takwim, R.N. Akhsanu Rahmad, Cahya Rahmat Muhamad Hudan Raihan Insan Nararya Ridho Ilham Ronilaya, Ferdian Sapto Wibowo Satworo Adiwidodo Subagiyo Subagiyo Sugeng Hadi Sugeng Hadi Susilo Sugeng Hadi Susilo Sugeng Hadi Susilo Sugeng Hadi Susilo Sulistyono Sulistyono Suyanta Suyanta Syamsul Ph.D M.A. Hadi Thomas Adikusuma Walid, Achmad Yudianto, Eko