Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.284
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal of Law Mataram Journal of International Law
Pitaloka, Diva
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search
Journal : Mataram Journal of International Law

 1 
Implementation of The Provincial Government’s Authority to Carry Out Sister Province Cooperation In The Perspective of International and National Law Case Study: Sister Province Cooperationbetween Province of NTB And Northern Province of Australia Tyanto, Amar; Risnain, Muh; Pitaloka, Diva
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v1i1.2846

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the position and strength of the LoI between the West Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government and the Northern Territory Government regarding sister province cooperation from the perspective of international law and national law. Furthermore, this research also examines the implementation of government authority and dispute resolution mechanisms stipulated in the Letter of Interest in the context of Sister Province agreements according to international law. The research method used is normative empirical. The Letter of Intent (LoI) between the West Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government and the Northern Territory Government regarding sister province cooperation has limited power and does not have binding legal force in the perspective of international law and national law. However, in the implementation of the authority exercised, the West Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government and the Northern Territory Government have gone through the stages of exploration, formulation of texts, and negotiations. The mechanism for resolving differences as stipulated in Article 10 requires an amicable settlement of any differences arising from the interpretation or implementation of the contents of the agreement.
Studi Kasus Putusan Permanent Court Arbitration (PCA) Tentang Sengketa Kepemilikan Zina Ekonomi Eksklusif (ZEE) Laut Cina Selatan Antara Republik Rakyat Cina (RRC) And Philipina Wahyudi, Indra; Risnain, Muh.; Pitaloka, Diva
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v1i1.2974

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis dasar pertimbangan Permanent Court Arbitration (PCA) dalam memutus perkara konflik Laut Cina Selatan antara Philipina dan Republik Rakyat Cina (RRC) serta untuk menganalisis dampak dari putusan tersebut terhadap perkembangan hukum laut internasional khusunya yang berkaitan dengan Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif . Jenis penelitian dalam penulisan skripsi ini yaitu penelitian hukum normatif, dengan metode Pendekatan kasus (Case Approach ). Pendekatan Perjanjian Internasioanl, Pendekatan Historis, Pendekatan Konseptual ( Conseptual Approach). Adapun hasil dan kesimpulan dari penelitian ini yakni, Permanent Court Arbitration dalam pertimbangan-pertimbangannya terhadap putusan(Award) menyatakan bahwa, pengajuan pertama ini mencerminkan suatu keluhan tentang sumber hak maritim di Laut Cina Selatan dan tentang klaim RRC atas hak bersejarah. Bahwa Hak maritim RRC di Laut China Selatan, tidak dapat melampaui yang secara tegas diizinkan oleh Konvensi PBB tentang Hukum Laut. Apa yang disebut “ Nine Dash Line ” bertentangan dengan Konvensi dan tanpa efek hukum sejauh melebihi batas-batas geografis dan substantif hak maritim China yang secara tegas diizinkan oleh UNCLOS. Pasca putusan ( Penghargaan), perkembangan hukum laut internasional tidak mengalami perubahaan yang signifikan, khususnya yang berkaitan dengan Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif (ZEE). Dalam putusannya PCA memberikan penegasan bahwa, Klaim Historis tidak serta merta dapat memberikan suatu Negara hak terhadap Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif (ZEE).
Implementation Of The Polluter Pays Principle On Space Debris, Dylan Welmart Welmart, Dylan Ritosa Theadiva; , Zunnuraeni; Pitaloka, Diva
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v1i2.3267

Abstract

The study aims to examine the extent to which The Polluter-Pays Principle on the Space Debris problem can be applied. Moreover, this study analyzes the prevention and recovery for countries affected by cases of falling space objects resulting from the launch of a country or a space company to the Earth's surface, particularly in the territory of a country. This study uses the normative method. This study's results determine that the Polluter-Pays Principle can be applied to handling environmental pollution problems caused by Space Debris, especially Space Debris which causes damage and pollution on the surface of the Earth. Therefore, in the case of the fall of Space Debris in Indonesian territory that causes environmental damage and pollution, this principle may be applied. The aggrieved party may ask for compensation based on the Liability Convention and Article 7 of The Outer Space Treaty. The Liability Convention stipulates that the launching State bears absolute responsibility in paying compensation for damage caused by space objects on the surface of the Earth or aircraft, and is responsible for the damage due to his mistake in space. This responsibility action is used to protect, prevent and restore the environmental impact caused by the case of a space object falling into the territory of a country.
KOMERSIALISASI RUANG ANGKASA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL DAN PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM NASIONAL INDONESIA: pengaturan komersialisasi ruang angkasa serta sumber daya alamnya berdasarkan outer space treaty 1967 dan permasalahan komersialisasi ruang angkasa dalam hukum nasional indonesia Amy rizki nurae aini, Amy rizki nurae aini; Zunnuraeni; Pitaloka, Diva
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v2i1.4198

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pengaturan mengenai komersialisasi ruang angkasa yang diatur dalam Outer Space Treaty 1967 sebagai landasan hukum penggunaan ruang angkasa dan pembaharuan hukum nasional Indonesia dalam menghadapi komersialisasi ruang angkasa. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pelitian normatif, yaitu dengan cara melakukan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan teoritis. Peraturan mengenai komersialisasi ruang angkasa diatur dalam Outer Space Treaty 1967 dan The Moon Agreement 1972 yang mengatur mengenai segala bentuk aktivitas penggunaan ruang angkasa termasuk kegiatan komersialisasi dan dalam hukum Nasional Indonesia diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2013 Tentang Keantariksaan dan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 45 Tahun 2017 Tentang Rencana Induk Penyelenggaraan Keantariksaan yang ditargetkan dalam waktu 25 tahun dimulai sejak tahun 2016 sampai dengan tahun 2040.
Analysis Of The World Trade Organization Panel Decision Between Indonesia And The European Union In Case Number Ds592 Of 2022 Concerning Restrictions On Exports Of Low-Grade Nickel Ore Zampara Mernissi; Risnain, Muh; Pitaloka, Diva
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v1i2.4221

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyse the suitability of Indonesia's nickel export restriction policy to international trade rules at the WTO and analyse the actions taken by the Indonesian Government following the WTO Panel Decision regarding the nickel export restriction policy. The research method uses the normative-legal research method. The legal approach methods use statutes, cases, international agreements, and conceptual approaches. The legal material sources or types of legal materials use primary and secondary legal materials. The legal material collection technique used is library data. The analysis of legal materials used is a review of statutory regulations and international agreements. The result of the study showed that the panel has decided that Indonesia has violated Article XI:1 GATT 1994 so Indonesia's policy cannot be justified by Articles XI:2 (a) and XX GATT 1994. Indonesia finally appealed the WTO Panel Report Number DS592. Researchers recommend considering the use of the Principles of Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources and Special and Different Treatment as a defence for the Indonesian Government. Furthermore, Indonesia can connect the policy of limiting nickel ore exports to the Net Zero Emission’s mission. Retaliation against the EU could be an alternative solution, but with the caveat that the Indonesian Government must ensure that the retaliation is right on target and does not harm the country's economy and the country's politics.
Abuse Of Power And The Right Of Inviolability By Foreign Diplomats (A Case Study Of Espionage By The Australian Ambassador Against Indonesia In 2013) Pirdayanti, Denda Retno; Muh. Risnain; Pitaloka, Diva
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v2i2.4575

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the abuse of diplomatic power by foreign diplomats, focusing on the case of Australian espionage against Indonesia in 2013. It evaluates the impact of this espionage on diplomatic relations, trust between the two nations, and the legal implications under international law, including state responsibility. This study employs normative legal research methods, combining document analysis, case studies, and a review of international legal literature. The findings highlight violations of international law, a deterioration in diplomatic relations, and a decline in trust. It underscores the need for fair enforcement of laws addressing breaches of diplomatic immunity. This research emphasizes the principles of international law, the responsibility of states for unlawful actions by diplomats, and the importance of strict oversight to uphold the integrity of diplomatic relations.
Co-Authors , Zunnuraeni AD. Basniwati Adhitya Nini Rizki Apriliana Amalia, Ayu Riska Amy rizki nurae aini, Amy rizki nurae aini Apriliana, AdhityaNini Rizki Ayu Riska Amalia Becánics, Adrienn Deni Achmad Indra Wahyudi, Indra Jumadi, Joko Lalu Guna Nugraha Maharani, Baiq Faridha Aulya Maya Shafira Muh. Risnain Muh. Risnain Muhammad Havez Mujtahidin, Syamsul Ninin Ernawati Nugraha, Lalu Guna Pirdayanti, Denda Retno Putra, Muhd. Hamka Maha Putri, Yunita Maya Ria Wierma Putri, Ria Wierma Riadhussyah, M. Ridwan, Ridwan Rizki Apriliana, Adhitya Nini Sembiring, Rinawati Silvia Riani, Rahmawati Sofwan Sofwan Syahida, Sarah Rachel Tyanto, Amar Welmart, Dylan Ritosa Theadiva Zampara Mernissi Zunnuraeni