Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS)

Kebijakan Penerapan Tindak Pidana Penistaan Agama Di Indonesia I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Ainul Azizah; Ahmad Fahrudin
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Juni: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v2i2.1642

Abstract

Ethnicity, religion, race and intergroup (SARA) are social elements that have an important role in human life, therefore, the freedom of each party must be respected and guaranteed. Religion is an important element of human existence and perhaps the most impressive element that can exert an important influence on the behavior of individuals. Indonesian positive law regulates punishment for perpetrators of religious blasphemy regulated in Article 156a of the Criminal Code. The initial purpose of enacting this article was against the backdrop of the many sects of belief and mysticism teachings that were considered heretical and not in accordance with the religious teachings of the Indonesian people. Article 156a of the Criminal Code is intended to prevent religious teachings from being distorted which are considered as the main teachings by the leaders or religious leaders concerned; and this rule protects religious peace in society and maintains the values of religious teachings that are maintained by the community from insults/humiliations and from teachings not to embrace a religion based on Belief in the One Supreme God.
Prinsip Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Penghentian Penuntutan Perkara Pidana Berdasarkan Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Ainul Azizah; I Gede Widhianan Suarda; Mardiyono Mardiyono
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Juni: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v2i2.1643

Abstract

Restorative justice or better known as restorative justice in the development of schools of law and punishment in human civilization, where the state returns the ius ponale and ius poniendi mandates to the community within the framework of healing, recovery and recovery. Restorative justice is a concept of thinking that responds to the development of the criminal justice system by focusing on the need to involve actors, communities and victims as a social recovery step in social relations. The principle of restorative justice is one of the principles of law enforcement in resolving cases which can be used as an instrument of recovery and has been implemented by the supreme court in the form of policy implementation (Supreme Court Regulations and Supreme Court Circulars). Restorative justice is considered a model of modern punishment that is more humane than the retributive justice used in the current justice system. One of the applications of this is the termination of the prosecution process by the prosecutor.