Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
5.342
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal BULETIN PENELITIAN SISTEM KESEHATAN Jurnal Filsafat Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Jurnal Konstitusi Warta Ardhia : Jurnal Perhubungan Udara Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Jurnal Filsafat Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Constitutional Review Warta Penelitian Perhubungan BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan Jurnal Yudisial Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan Majalah Hukum Nasional Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Jurnal Konstitusi Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia Jurnal Kearsipan Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Warta Penelitian Perhubungan
Dian Agung Wicaksono
Departemen Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mechanical Engineering Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 57 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

 1 
Peluang Penerapan Purcell Principle sebagai Judicial Restraint Bagi Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang pada Tahapan Pemilihan Umum Dian Agung Wicaksono
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 5 SEPTEMBER 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

There are differing opinions regarding the Constitutional Court's decision to review laws related to elections after the election stages have begun, which indicates a lack of implementation of the Purcell principle. This principle states that the court cannot make decisions that affect changes to election rules once the election stage has begun, as it would make it difficult for organizers to adjust the rules and create confusion for the public. The aim of this research is to answer two questions: (1) how can the concepts of the Purcell principle and judicial restraint be explained in relation to the judiciary? and (2) what are the chances of applying the Purcell principle as a form of judicial restraint by the Constitutional Court when reviewing laws during the election stage? This is normative legal research that analyzes secondary data, including relevant laws and regulations, and various related literature. The findings show that the Purcell principle and judicial restraint have developed as concepts in the practice of the United States judiciary. Judges who apply the Purcell principle also apply the concept of judicial restraint because the court limits itself from making decisions that impact election rules during the election stage, thereby demonstrating the judge's attitude in applying judicial restraint. Moreover, there are several opportunities for the Constitutional Court to apply the Purcell principle as a form of judicial restraint when reviewing laws during the election stage.
Ambiguitas Nomenklatur Kementerian, Lembaga Pemerintah, dan Lembaga Pemerintah Non Kementerian (LPNK) pada Kabinet Merah Putih Dian Agung Wicaksono; Garuda Era Ruhpinesthi
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 5 SEPTEMBER 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

During Prabowo Subianto's leadership, various presidential institutions were established, including ministries, non-ministerial government institutions (LPNK), and other government agencies, each with different names. The formation of these institutions raises important questions regarding their characteristics, particularly concerning their scope of authority, organizational position, and the appointment of their leaders. Additionally, this highlights potential ambiguities in their regulations. This study addresses two key questions: (a) How are the ministries, government institutions, and non-ministerial government institutions organized within the Cabinet? (b) What ambiguities exist in the nomenclature of ministries, government institutions, and non-ministerial government institutions in the Cabinets? This research employs a normative legal approach, utilizing both statutory and conceptual analyses. The findings indicate that the institutional mapping within the Cabinets includes 7 coordinating ministries, 41 ministries, 8 LPNK, and one government institution. Furthermore, ambiguities exist in the regulations concerning these three types of presidential institutions, specifically regarding their scope of authority, organizational positions, and leadership structures.
Co-Authors Almonika Cindy Fatika Sari Ananda Prima Yurista Ananda Prima Yurista Ananda Prima Yurista, Ananda Prima Andi Sandi Antonius Tabusassa Tonralipu, Andi Sandi Antonius Tabusassa Andy Omara ayunita Nur Rohanawati Bimo Fajar Hantoro Bimo Fajar Hantoro Chrysnanda Dwilaksana Daisyta Mega Sari Dedy Kurniawan Dewi Prathita Rachmi Enny Nurbaningsih Faiz Rahman, Faiz Feliatra Galih Erlangga Garuda Era Ruhpinesthi Ginting, Eriko Fahri Hafid Lastito Iwan Puja Riyadi Khotibul Umam Kurniawan, Dedy Lastito, Hafid Muhammad Fatahillah Akbar Mulyani, Cora Kristin Mulyani, Cora Kristin Nabila Desyalika Putri Ola Anisa Ayutama Ola Anisa Ayutama Putri, Nabila Desyalika Rachmi, Dewi Prathita Rahman, Faiz Riyadi, Iwan Puja Umi Sa'adatun Nikmah