Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
18.65
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Applied Power Engineering (IJAPE) International Journal of Public Health Science (IJPHS) International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan EKUIVALEN - Pendidikan Matematika TEKNIK Jurnal Presipitasi : Media Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Teknik Lingkungan GEMA TEKNOLOGI Media Kesehatan Masyarakat Indonesia Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan indonesia JURNAL PROMOSI KESEHATAN INDONESIA Prosiding Seminar Biologi Publikasi Pendidikan Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Journal of Tropical Soils Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Dinamika Pendidikan Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan Waste Technology Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat Jurnal Produksi Tanaman FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum MONOGRAF Eksergi: Chemical Engineering Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum LINK AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika World Chemical Engineering Journal Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Alchemy Jurnal Penelitian Kimia JURNAL KESEHATAN LINGKUNGAN (Journal of Environmental Health) JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) JHP17 (Jurnal Hasil Penelitian) Diponegoro Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika HIGEIA (Journal of Public Health Research and Development) Educational Management Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies Edu Geography Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pajak JURNAL KESEHATAN LINGKUNGAN: Jurnal dan Aplikasi Teknik Kesehatan Lingkungan Kesmas Indonesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Masyarakat AKSIOLOGIYA : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA) Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Jurnal Dimensi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia AcTion: Aceh Nutrition Journal Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Diksa : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung (Journal of Agricultural Engineering) Al-Madrasah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL PROGRAM PASCASARJANA Media Kesehatan Politeknik Kesehatan Makassar JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Evangelikal: Jurnal Teologi Injili dan Pembinaan Warga Jemaat Adimas : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jambura Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Unnes Journal of Public Health Journal of Primary Education Kosmik Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Publik dan Kebijakan Sosial Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP) Poltekita : Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Dinasti International Journal of Management Science International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR) Management Studies and Entrepreneurship Journal (MSEJ) Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Hasil Penelitian ASEAN Journal of Chemical Engineering Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA Surya Teknika: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Mesin Jurnal Pajak dan Keuangan Negara (PKN) Budimas : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesian Journal of Global Health research Jurnal JURISTIC (JuJUR) Jurnal Idea Hukum IGKOJEI: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Narra J Ekonomi dan Bisnis Journal of Instructional and Development Researches Pancasila and Law Review Ius Poenale Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat Indonesia (JPPMI) Jurnal Agroteknologi Pertanian dan Publikasi Riset Ilmiah (JAPPRI) Biram Samtani Sains Jurnal Riset Kesehatan Masyarakat Journal of Vocational Studies on Applied Research Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Edukasia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran VIVA THEMIS- Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Surya Teknika: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Mesin Jurnal Masyarakat Madani Indonesia Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood : Jurnal Dunia Anak Usia Dini Journal of Education Method and Learning Strategy Jurnal Kala Nea Soedirman Law Review Proceeding of International Conference on Humanity Education and Society Jurnal Cerdas Mendidik Jurnal Sosialita: Jurnal Kajian Sosial dan Pendidikan Malahayati International Journal of Nursing and Health Science Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies Proceeding Mulawarman International Conference on Tropical Public Health
Budiyono Budiyono
SMA Negeri 1 Semarang, Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 362 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 37 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

 1   2   3   4 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DAN GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) PADA MATERI SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MATEMATIS LOGIS SISWA Susandi, Ardi Dwi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstyact:The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the mathematical logical quotient of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the TSTS type, the Cooperative Learning Model of the GI type, and the direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research.  Its population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Cirebon regency in Academic Year 2013/2014. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 364 students. They were grouped into three classes, namely: 123 in Experimental Class 1, 117 in Experimental Class 2, and 124 in Control Class. The instruments to gather the data were test of achievement in Mathematics on the learning material of Quadrangle, and test of mathematical logical quotient. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. 1) The cooperative learning model of the TSTS type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the cooperative learning model of the GI type and the direct learning model, the cooperative learning model of the GI type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model. 2) The students with the high mathematical logical quotient have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate mathematical logical quotient and those with the low mathematical logical quotient, the students with the moderate mathematical logical quotient have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low mathematical logical quotient. 3) There was an interaction the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the mathematical logical quotient on the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students.Keywords:TSTS, GI, and mathematical logical quotient.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN OPEN-ENDED PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI DISPOSISI MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN PURWOREJO Wijayaanto, Zainnur; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The study aimed to know: 1) which one of the learning models gave a better achievement between Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning model with Open-Ended Approach, TPS, or direct learning model, 2) which one of the students with mathematical disposition category had a better achievement between students with high, moderate or low mathematical disposition, 3) in each student’s mathematical disposition category, which learning model gave a better student’s achievement in mathematics, 4) in each learning models, which one of the students with mathematical disposition category had a better student’s achievement in mathematics. This was quasi-experimental study with 3x3 factorial design. The study population was all eighth grade students of state junior high school in Purworejo District. Instruments used to collect data were mathematics achievement test and the student’s mathematical disposition questionnaire. The data were analyzed using unbalanced two ways ANOVA. Based on the data analysis, it was concluded that: 1) TPS with Open-Ended Approach gave better achievement than TPS and direct learning model while TPS and direct learning model gave same achievement, 2) the students with high mathematical disposition had better achievement than the students with moderate and low mathematical disposition, and the students with moderate mathematical disposition had better achievement than the students with low mathematical disposition, 3) at all categories of students’ mathematical disposition, TPS with Open-Ended Approach, TPS, and direct learning model gave the same achievement, 4) in the TPS with Open-Ended Approach and TPS, the students with high mathematical disposition had better achievement than the students with moderate and low mathematical disposition, and the students with moderate mathematical disposition had better achievement than the students with low mathematical disposition. In the direct learning model, the students with high mathematical disposition had better achievement than the students with moderate and low mathematical disposition, while the students with moderate and low mathematical disposition had the same achievement.Keywords: Think Pair Share (TPS), Open-Ended Approach, Direct Instruction, Mathematical Disposition, Learning Achievement in Mathematics.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER PADA MATERI POKOK FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTERPERSONAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA Zainuddin, Zainuddin; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this research were to determine: (1) which has better learning achievement, students are given TS-TS, NHT, or direct  intruction, (2)  which has better learning achievement, students with intrapersonal intelligence of high, medium or low, (3) which has better learning achievement, students with interpersonal intelligence of high, medium or low on each learning model, (4) which has better learning achievement, students are given TS-TS, NHT, and direct intruction on each interpersonal intelligence. This study was a quasi experimental research with 3 3 factorial design. The population of this study was all eighth grade students of junior high schools in Surakarta. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The sample in this study are 271 people with details of 89 people for class experiment I, 91 people for class experiment II and 91 people for control class. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and  questionnaire of student’s interpersonal intelligence. The data was analyzed using two ways anova. Based on the hypothesis test, it is concluded as follows. (1) Cooperative learning methods TS-TS type provide a better performance than cooperative learning method NHT type and direct intruction. (2) Mathematics learning achievements of students with high interpersonal intelligence levels did not differ from that of students with medium levels of interpersonal intelligence, while learning mathematics achievement of students with a high or medium level of interpersonal intelligence was better than that of students with low levels of interpersonal intelligence. (3) At each level of students’ interpersonal intelligence, TS-TS provided a better mathematics learning achievement compared with NHT learning and direct learning, while NHT learning provided no difference in mathematics learning achievement from direct learning. (4) At each learning model, mathematics learning achievement of students with high level of interpersonal intelligence was not different from that of students with medium level of interpersonal intelligence, while mathematics learning achievement of students with a high or medium level of interpersonal intelligence was better than that of students with low levels of interpersonal intelligence.Keywords: Two Stay Two Stray (TS-TS), Numbered Heads Together (NHT), Interpersonal Intelligence.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN ROUNDTABLE (RT) DAN QUESTION STUDENT HAVE (QSH) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI OPERASI BENTUK ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP SE-KOTA METRO LAMPUNG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Widyaningrum, Amalia Zulvia; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one is better among learning models of RT with scientific approach, QSH with scientific approach or classical with scientific approach one in giving mathematics learning achievement, (2) which one is better among students’ learning styles, students having visual, auditorial or kinesthetic giving mathematics learning achievement. (3) in each learning model, which one is better among students’ learning styles in giving mathematics learning achievement and (4) in each learning styles, which one is better among RT with scientific approach, QSH with scientific approach or classical with scientific approach in giving mathematics learning achievement. This research was the quasi-experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of research was all grade VIII students of Junior High School (SMP) in Metro, Lampung. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that were used to collect the data were the test of mathematics achievement and questionnaire of learning styles. As a requirement of research, both of the instruments should be measured.  Test of students’ learning achievement data was measured by using content validity, level of difficulty, discrimination power and reliability. Questionnaire data were examined by using content validity, internal consistency and reliability. Pre-requisite tests were used Lilliefors method for normality test and Bartlett method for homogeneity test. After examining the data, it shows that the populations have same variance and they were in normal distribution. Prior knowledge data are examined by using one-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. It shows that three classes have balance prior knowledge. Meanwhile, the technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed as follows. (1) The RT with scientific approach had better learning achievement than the QSH and classical with scientific approach. QSH with scientific approach provided better learning achievement than the classical with scientific approach, (2) The students having visual learning style had learning achievement as good as those having auditorial learning style. The students having visual learning style had better learning achievement than did those having kinesthetic learning style. The students having auditorial learning style had learning achievement as good as those having kinesthetic learning style.  (3) In each of learning styles, student’s mathematics learning achievement is in constancy with result of learning models (4) In each learning models, the student’s mathematics learning achievement is in constancy with  result of learning style categories.Keywords: Round Table (RT), Question Student Have (QSH), Classical,  Learning Style
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL) PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN LINEAR SATU VARIABEL DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL SISWA Winata, Rahmat; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) Which one give better mathematics’ learning achievement, learning model of NHT with CTL, TPS with CTL or direct learning, (2) Which one have better mathematics’ learning achievement, students who have high, medium or low. (3) On each learning model, which one give better achievement on each emotional intelligence. (4) On each level of emotional intelligence, which one give better mathematics’ learning achievement, learning model of NHT with CTL, TPS with CTL or direct learning. This research was the quasi-experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of research was all students of Junior High School (SMP) in Karanganyar. The samples were 308 students; consist of 104 students in the first experimental class, 104 in the second experimental class, and 100 students in control class. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed as follows. (1) The NHT with CTL given learning achievement as good as the TPS with CTL. NHT and TPS with CTL provided better learning achievement than the direct learning, (2) The students with high emotional intelligence had better learning achievement than those with medium and low emotional intelligence. The students with medium emotional intelligence had better learning achievement than did those with low emotional intelligence, (3) Students taught by using NHT and TPS with CTL, students with high emotional intelligence had learning achievement as good as the medium emotional intelligence. The students with high emotional intelligence had better learning achievement than the students with low emotional intelligence. The students with medium emotional intelligence had learning achievement as good as the students with low emotional intelligence. Students taught by using direct learning had equal learning achievement in each level of emotional intelligence, (4) Students with high emotional intelligence taught by using the NHT with CTL had learning achievement as good as the TPS with CTL. Students with high emotional intelligence taught by using the NHT and TPS with CTL had better learning achievement than the direct learning. Students with medium and low emotional intelligence had equal learning achievement in each learning model.Keywords: NHT with CTL, TPS with CTL, learning achievement, emotional intelligence.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DENGAN PENDEKATAN PROBLEM POSING DAN TIPE JIGSAW TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MENYELESAIKAN SOAL CERITA PADA PECAHAN DITINJAU DARI TINGKAT PERCAYA DIRI SISWA KELAS VII SMP/MTs DI KOTA METRO LAMPUNG Kusumaningtyas, Wahyu; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one is better in giving the mathematical word problem solving ability among learning models of jigsaw with problem posing approach, learning models of jigsaw, or direct instructional models, (2) which one is better in giving the mathematical word problem solving ability among students’ level of confidence, students having high, medium or low level, (3) in each level of confidence, which one is better in giving the mathematical word problem solving ability among learning models of jigsaw with problem posing approach, learning models of jigsaw, or direct instructional models and (4) in each learning models, which one is better in giving the mathematical word problem solving ability among students’ level of confidence, students having high, medium or low level. This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of the research was all grade VII students of Junior High School (SMP) in Metro, Lampung in academic year 2013/2014. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that were used to collect the data were the test and questionnaire of student’s level of confidence. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The results of research showed as follows. (1) Learning models of jigsaw with problem posing approach had mathematical word problem solving ability as good as learning models of jigsaw, learning models of jigsaw with problem posing approach had better mathematical word problem solving ability than direct instructional models, and learning models of jigsaw had mathematical word problem solving ability as good as direct instructional models. (2) The students having high level of confidence had mathematical word problem solving ability as good as those having medium level of confidence. The students having high level of confidence had better mathematical word problem solving ability than those having low level of confidence. The students having medium level of confidence had mathematical word problem solving ability as good as those having low level of confidence. (3) In each level of confidence, learning models of jigsaw with problem posing approach had better mathematical word problem solving ability than direct instructional models. (4) In each learning models, the students having high level of confidence had better mathematical word problem solving ability than those having low level of confidence.Keywords : Jigsaw with Problem Posing Approach, Direct Instructional Models,    Mathematical Word Problem Solving Ability, Confidence.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN TWO STAY TWOSTRAY (TSTS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA Rahman, Arif; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on learning achievement viewed from learning style types of the students. The learning models compared were NHT, TSTS, and classical with scientific approach model. The type of the research was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research was the students in grade X senior high school in Mataram City on academic year of 2014/2015. The size of the sample was 279 students, which was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used for data collection were learning style questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The hypothesis test used unbalance two ways analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) NHT and TSTS with scientific approach learning models gave better achievement than classical with scientific learning model. NHT and TSTS with scientific approach learning models gave the same achievement. (2) The students with visual and auditory learning style had better achievement than the students with kinesthetic learning style. The students with visual and auditory learning style had the same achievement. (3) In NHT with scientific approach learning model, the students with visual and auditory learning style the same achievement, the students with auditory and visual learning style had better achievement than the students with kinesthetic learning style. In TSTS and Classical with scientific approach learning models, the students with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning style the same achievement. (4) At the students with visual learning style, NHT and TSTS with scientific approach learning models gave the same achievement. NHT with scientific approach learning model gave better achievement than classical with scientific learning model. TSTS and classical with scientific approach learning models gave the same achievement. At the students with auditory and kinesthetic learning style, NHT, TSTS, and classical with scientific approach learning models gave the same achievement.Keywords: Numbered Heads Together, Two Stay Two Stray, Classical learning model, Scientific Approach, Learning Style, Achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PENEMUAN TERBIMBING, PAIR CHECKS, DAN THINK PAIR SHARE PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR Muawanah, Lina; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of guided discovery learning model, Pair Check (PC), and Think Pair Share (TPS) on the mathematics achievement of students in terms of student learning styles. This research used the quasi-experimental with factorial design 3x3. The population of this research was all Junior High School eighth grade students in Semarang Regency that used KTSP 2006. The sampling technique was conducted by stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments used to collect data were mathematics achievement test and questionnaire learning styles. The data was analyzed using two ways ANOVA with unbalanced cell, then then preceded with multiple comparative test using Scheffe method. Based on the hypothesis test, the results of this research obtained the following conclusions. 1) Guided discovery learning model provided a better learning achievement than learning model PC and TPS, as well as learning model TPS and PC  provided the same learning achievement. 2) Students with a visual learning style had better learning achievement than the students with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles, as well as students with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles had the same learning achievement. 3) In each learning model that guided discovery, PC and TPS, students with learning styles visual, auditory and kinesthetic provided the same mathematics learning achievement (4) In each of the students with visual and kinesthetic learning styles, learning model guided discovery, PC, and TPS had the same learning achievement. At the students with auditory learning styles, learning models had guided discovery learning achievement were better than a PC, the PC and TPS learning model had the same mathematics achievement, as well as guided discovery learning model and TPS had the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: Learning model, cooperative learning, guided discovery, PC, TPS, learning styles, learning achievement in Mathematics
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) DAN THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) DENGAN PENDEKATAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK PADA MATERI RELASI DAN FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SEMESTER 1 SMP N DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN Sari, Rahmita Ika; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

 Abstract: The objectives of this research were to find out: (1) which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those treated with direct learning, those with GI with PMR or those with TTW with PMR approach, (2) which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those with high or medium or low learning creativity, (3) in each learning creativity, which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those treated with direct learning, those with GI with PMR or those with TTW with PMR approach, and (4) in each learning model, which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those with high or medium or low learning creativity. This research was a quasi experimental research employing 2 independent variables (learning model and learning creativity) and 1 dependent variable (mathematics learning achievement). The population of research was all of the VIII graders of Public Junior High Schools in the school year of 2013/2014. The sampling technique used was Stratified Cluster Random Sampling. The sample students consisted of three schools: SMP Negeri 1, SMP Negeri 6 and SMP Negeri 2 Karangmalang Sragen. The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance (ANAVA) with unbalanced cells with the factorial design of 3 x 3. The results of research were as follows: (1) the students treated with direct learning model had learning achievement as good as those with GI learning model with PMR approach, those with TTW learning model with PMR approach had learning achievement better than those with direct learning, while those with TTW with PMR had learning achievement as good as those with GI learning model with PMR approach, (2) the students with high learning creativity had learning achievement as good as those with medium one, those with high and medium learning creativity had learning achievement better than those with low one, (3) in each learning creativity level, the students treated with direct learning model had learning achievement as same as those with GI learning model with PMR approach, those with TTW learning model with PMR approach had learning achievement better than those with direct learning, and those with TTW with PMR had learning achievement as same as those with GI learning model with PMR approach, (4) in each learning model, the students with high learning creativity had learning achievement as same as those with medium one, those with high and medium learning creativity had learning achievement better than those with low one.Keywords: Group Investigation (GI), Think Talk Write (TTW), Realistic Mathematics Education approach, Learning Creativity.
PROSES BERPIKIR SISWA KELAS V SEKOLAH DASAR DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA Sudibyo, Nugroho Arif; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This study aim to describe the thinking process of elementary school fifth grade students in solving mathematics problem based on Krulik and Rudnick rule. This research was a qualitative research using the case study method. Sampling was done by a combination of purposive sampling and snowball sampling technique. The subject of research that used in this study was twelve subjects, that was: four high-ability students, four moderate-ability students and four low-ability students. The data was validated by using a time triangulation test. The results show: (1) At the step of reading and thinking, students do not directly identify all of the facts in writing. After identifying the facts, students identify questions from the given problem. Furthermore, students do not portray the problems encountered but directly process the needed information to answer the question; (2) At the step of exploring and planning, students organize the information on the matter. Students consider enough information on the matter because there is a relation between the known and the asked. On the other hand, students do not make tables, diagrams, charts, tables or images from a given problem, but directly chose a strategy to answer the question; (3) At the step of selecting the strategy, students use the making list of all possible answers strategy. Students write down all the possibilities answers in the answer sheet. However, there are students who also use the guessing and testing strategy, guess how the value of variable and test whether the variable value is correct. In addition there are also students who use simulation or experimental strategies, students try to experiments; (4) At the step of finding the answer, the student use estimation in finding the answer. On the other hand, there is one student who uses algebra ability to find the answers. Students are also assuming the third day as a variable. After obtaining the value of the variable, student examine whether the numbers are correct. (5) At the step of reflecting and extending, students can review the results of the calculation by return on the answer sheet. Then students find that the answer is correct. Furthermore, students assume no alternative other solutions. Then the students do not make a generalizations of matter and discover the concept of matter.Keywords: process thinking, mathematics and problem solving.
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz Abi Fadila Achmad Nurrofiq Adinata, Yuda candri Aditya Kusumawati, Aditya Aditya, Vanessa Rizky Afidah, Sururin Afriyanto Afriyanto Agung Kurniawan Agus Hadiyarto Agus Margono AGUS PURWANTO Agus Yuwono Agustin, Tina Agustina, Risa Ahmad Faqihi, Ahmad Ahmad Saleh Ainun Ikbal, Alif Airlangga Airlangga, Airlangga Alfan Afandi Alfarizi, Safrudi Ali Djamhuri Ali, Syuhaeda Aeni Mat Aliyana, Aliyana Alvitriani Alvitriani, Alvitriani Amalia Zulvia Widyaningrum Ana Fauziah Anak Agung Istri Sri Wiadnyani Anastasya, Diana Ayu Andi Irwan Benardi, Andi Irwan Andini, Swastika Andri Cahyo Kumoro Andriyani, Liz Y. Anggi T W, Y Gigih Anggi TW, Y Gigih Anggun Srirahayu, Anggun Angkasa Angkasa Ani Margawati Ani Nurwijayanti, Ani Anisa Nurjanah, Anisa Anna Setyowati Antarini Antarini, Antarini Antono Suryoputro Anwar Ardani Anwar, M. Khoerul Apoina Kartini Aprilia Aprilia, Aprilia Apsari, Laeila Ardi Dwi Susandi Ardiyanto, David Arief Kristyawan Arif Rahman Arkhan Subari Armunanto, Armunanto Arrohmah, Munib Asfiya, Nissa Atul Astorina Yunita Dewanti, Nikie Astorina, Nikie Aulia Musla Mustika Aurell, Yuendzi Santa Ayun Sriatmi Ayuningtyas, Nimas Putri AYUNINGTYAS, RENY Bagoes Widjanarko Baharsyah, Moh. Nasrul Baharsyah, Moh. Nasrul Barkhuizen, Jaco Bayu Wicaksono Beni Saputra Bibit Nasrokhatun Diniah Binti Anisaul Khasanah Bq Malikah Hr, Bq Malikah Buchori Asyik Budi Santosa Budi Santosa Budi Usodo Budi Warsito Bustomi Bustomi Cahya Tri Purnami Chadikun, Paulus Chairani, Nadia Christiyani, Bintang Rumiris D. Wasgito Purnomo Dalud Daeka Darmadi Darmadi Darmanto Darmawati, Ratna Puspa Dedy Miswar Desi Tri Utami, Desi Tri Dessy Paiman Desy Arshinta, Desy Devi Yuliyanti Dewanti, Nikie Astorina Dewi Muliasari Dewi Nurhalimah, Dewi Dewi Retno Sari Dewi Retno Sari S Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno Dewi, Hapsari Dewi, Rahmatika Dian Dwi Astutik, Dian Dwi Dian Fitri Argarini, Dian Fitri Diana Diana Diari Indriati Dismas Suparmo Djemari Mardapi Dwi Hapsari Retnaningrum Dwi Kurniawan, Ari Dwi Rohman Soleh, Dwi Rohman Dzakiyah, Anis Edi Subkhan, Edi Edwin Latif Hardiyanto Edy Haryono Efendi, Tino Feri Eko Nugroho Eko Widaryanto Elida Novita Ellesse, Karinna Elvia, Rosi Elywati Elywati Erna Dewi . Ernawati, Fifth Ervianni, Novi Yuli Esti Setiawati Eva Tri Wahyuni Evi Yulia Arini, Evi Yulia Fadhilah, Fatin FADHOLI, MUHAMMAD Fajarwati, Eka Farid Afrian, Muhammad Fathurrahman, Hanif Muhammad Fauzi, Ihwan Feri Candra Setiawan, Feri Candra Feriandi, Yoga Ardian Feriansah, Arif Firdausi, Eyda Firmansyah Firmansyah Firmansyah, Ade Arif Firmansyah, Aditya Fitriana Anggar Kusuma Fitriana, Laila Fitriani, Nanda Fofana, Fadillah Fathir Mahmud Friska, Erlin FX Sumarja, FX Gatut Iswahyudi Giant Aprisetyani Gultom, Rachel Sophia Joy Aprilia Hadi, Siswan Handayani, Mella Handayani, Novia Haq, Zahron Hardiansyah, Mas Achmad Hartuti Purnaweni Haryono Haryono Hasirun, La Ode Hastuti, Endah Kurnia Hefnita, Hefnita Heldy Ramadhan Putra P Hendriana, Rani Hendriyanto, Agus Hendry Putra, Hendry Heny Kusumayanti Heri Triluqman Budisantoso Herlina, Meri Hermanu Joebagio Heru Kurniawan Hibnu Nugroho Hidayatulloh, Taufiq Hodiyanto, Hodiyanto I Gusti Bagus Wiksuana I N. Widiasa Ida Hayu Dwimawanti Ignata Noviantari Sinar Y, Ignata Noviantari Imam Faizin, Imam Imam Prasetyo Imam Sujadi Indarto Indarto Iqbal Syaichurrozi Ira Kurniawati Irene Endah Tri Winihati Irfan Zidni1, Muhammad Irma Lusi Nugraheni Isnandar Slamet, Isnandar Isnawati Isnawati istiqomah istiqomah Istiqomah, Layli Nur Itsna Farida Jani, Jani Jayawarsa, A.A. Ketut Johan, Riche Chyntia Juwita Rini Kana Hidayati Karamang, Syukur Kartono, Kartono Katherine Her Pratiwi Khadafi Indrawan Khadijah Khadijah Khafittulloh Viqriah, Khafittulloh Khamsatul Faizati, Khamsatul Kharisma Ardhy W Khoerul Anwar KHOIRUL ANAM Kiki Kurniawan Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati, Kiki Riska Ayu Kinanti, Hidayah Arum Kiswanto, Andre Kiswanto, Andre Komariyatun, Eny Kristanti, Arin Ike Kuat Puji Prayitno Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono Kusnilawati, Nunik Kusumawardani, Rahma Desta Kusumawardani, Seftia Kuwat Slamet, Kuwat Laelusifah, Laelusifah Lestari, Resta Lina Muawanah, Lina Lirëza, Linert LMS Kristiyanti, LMS LMS. Kristiyanti Luqman Buchori M. Ari Wuryanto M. Fakih M. Ilham Fredian Syah , M. Ilham M. Ridlo Yuwono Ridlo M. USMAN Ma'rifatulloh, Dicky Ma'ruf, Muhammad Hasan Mahani, Ibud Mahfudin, Ains Eka Mahmudah Titi Muanifah Malicia Evendia Mardodo Mardodo Mariay, Ivonne F. Marita, Iklia Mariyah Eka Pratiwi, Mariyah Eka Mariyani, Anjar Martini Martini Maryam, Isnaeni Marylin Junias, Marylin Marzuki Marzuki Mashudi Mashudi Masro?ah, 'Izzatul Mateus Sakundarno Adi, Mateus Sakundarno Matin, Hashfi Hawali Abdul Mawarni, Arum Maya Kartika Sari Misgiono Misgiono, Misgiono Mohammad Nasir, Mohammad Mohammad Zen Rahfiludin Muhamad Safa’udin, Muhamad Muhammad Akhyar Muhammad Nasir Muhammad Rido Muhammad Rifai Muhammad Rifqi Muhtadi Muhtadi Muji Slamet Lestari, Muji Slamet Muliasari, Dewi Muliyadi Muliyadi Mursid Rahardjo Mursid Raharjo Musa Musa Nabiha, Puteri Inandin Najikhah , Fatikhatun Nanang Nabhar Fakhri Auliya, Nanang Nabhar Nanda Noor Fadjrin, Nanda Noor Nani Suwarni Nasrin Nasrin, Nasrin Nasrokhatun Diniah, Bibit Nata, Delvia Putri Neni Mariana Niki Astorina Yunita Dewanti, Niki Astorina Yunita Nila Kurniasih Ningrum, Dwi Ayu Nirwana, Nita Noverita Dian T, Noverita Dian Novia Fajar Utami Noviana, Yuita Tri Novita, Maryana Nugraha, Ferry Satya Adi Nugroho Arif Sudibyo Nugroho, Muhamad Asif Cahya Aji Nugroho, Norcha Satria Adi Nuha, Nabila Ulin Nunuk Suryani Nur Endah Wahyuningsih Nur Fajria Safarina, Ismi Nur Faqih, Mochamad Nur Hasanah, Ria Siti Nurani Nurani Nurbani, Agung Nurfitri Astuti Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati Nurjazuli Nurjazuli Nurlaela, Latifah Nurul Aziza, Nurul NURUL AZIZAH Nurul Farhin Nurviana, Vina Nuswantari, Nuswantari Octarina Hidayatus Sholikhah Onny Setiani Othman, Nur Hidayati Paga, Bertha Ollin Paminto, Joko Paminto, Joko Pardana Wati, Sri Laksmi Perdana, Muhammad Faza Permatasari, Nisa Pertiwi, Anita Prabowo, Joko Setyo Pradana, Danindra Bagas Pradana, Danindra Bagas Pradana, Mochamad Agung Prapsilo, Restu Agus Prasetyo Budi Darmono pratiwi, hasih Pratiwi, Hasih Prihanti, Rheni Primadi Bagus Saputro Priyanto, Teguh Puastuti, Dwi Puji Nugraheni Purna Bayu Nugroho Purwanto Purwanto Pusaka, Semerdanta Pusfitra, Susi Puspitasari, Dio Putra Adi Wibowo Putri, Latifah Eka Putri, Vilentia Sindy Hermadianti Putri, Yunisha Dena Rachmani, Ayu Shafira Rahayuningtyas, Indah Rahma Kurnia Sri Utami Rahmat Winata Rahmita Ika Sari Rakhman, Dani Raodatul Jannah Ratih Kusumaningrum Ratna Januarita Ratri, Sari Dwika Religiana, Mergy Religiana, Mergy Reny Yesiana Resiandi, Arida Retno Anggraheni Retno Wahyuningsih Reza Kusuma Setyansah, Reza Kusuma Rianto, Muhammad Richo Riawan Yudi Purwoko Riestianty, Riestianty Rigianti, Henry Aditia Rika Adi Kusumo, Rika Adi Riki Andriatna Riki Tri Kurniawan, Riki Tri Rinawati Rinawati Riyadi Riyadi Riza Ayuningtyas, Riza Rizky, M. Affan Rizqi Khoirunnisa Robia Astuti Rofiah, Nurul Hidayati Rohmah, Anita Khoiri Rosahada, Ailsa Devina Rosaini, Rosaini Rosana Rosana Rosiana, Tina Rosiana, Tina Ruba, Yohanes Emanuel Rukmini Rukmini Rumainum, Inna Martha S Siswanto Sa'idah, Ulya Sabila, Attina Surya Safa’udin, Muhamad Safitri, Eliya Salman Paris Harahap Salsabila, Unik Hanifah Sanat Dia, Sanat Sanusi Sanusi Saputra, Whin Themas Mico Sari, Gustia Paramitha Sari, Putri Permata Sariyasni, Sariyasni Sariyasni, Sariyasni Sariyatun Sariyatun Satrio Wicaksono Sudarman Sebastianus Widanarto Prijowuntato, Sebastianus Widanarto Seno Johari Septi Wulandari Septo Pawelas Arso Setiani, Ony Setiawan, Feri Setiawan, Sofiyan Setya Wahyudi Setyo Prabowo, Joko Shanti Indah Lestari, Shanti Indah Sholeh Muntasyir Sholichatun Aisyah Rahmawati, Sholichatun Aisyah Sigit Saptono Silmi, Rhaniya Sisca Fajriani Siswo Sumardiono Siti Kunarti SITI RACHMAWATI Siti Uswatun Hasanah Solly Aryza Sri Hartati Ningsih Sri Hartini Sri Laksmi Pardanawati, Sri Laksmi Sri Pawiti, Sri Pawiti Sri Subanti Sri Sumiyati Sri Yamtinah Stacia Reviany Mege Suci Irawati Sudarma, Sudarma Sudarmi Sudarmi Sudarno Sudarno Sudarno utomo Sugih Wijayati, Sugih Sugiman Sugiman Sugiyarta Stanislaus, Sugiyarta Suhada, Ahmad Syauqi Suhartono Suherman, Suherman sukardi, sukardi - SULISTIYANI SULISTIYANI SUMADI SUMADI Sumarwati Sunarso Sunarso Sunaryo Sunaryo Supratikta, Hadi Suprihati - Supriyono Supriyono Surjoputro, Antono Suryaningsih, Nurohmah SURYO Budi Santoso Sutanto Sutanto Sutopo Patria Jati Sutrima Sutrima Sutrisno, Sutrisno Suyadi Suyadi Syafrudin Syafrudin Syaiful Anwar Syamsul Arifin Syamsulhuda BM Tardi Tardi Taufik, Opik Tenang Haryanto Thaib, Fachri Tika Karlina R Titi Prihatin Tri Joko Tri Retnaningsih Soeprobowati Tri Wahyuningsih Tri Widyastuti Tuakong, Wigberta Mogi Tuhumena, Veronica L. Tulus Junanto Tutuk Djoko Kusworo UGP, Rusli Umi Hartati, Umi Umi Supraptinah, Umi Utomo, Dani Puji Vera Dewi Susanti Vera Rosalina Bulu Veronica Sri Wigiyanti Vinta Mariko Malau, Vinta Mariko Wafiyatu Maslahah, Wafiyatu Wahyono, Yoyon Wahyu Kusumaningtyas Wahyu Prihatiningrum Wahyu Romadlhon, Ahmad Wamafma, Ilona M. Wardi Wardi Wawan Kokotiasa, Wawan Wayangkau, Erich C. Wayangkau, Erich Christian Weda Kupita Werdania, Riandhita Eri Wharyanti Ika Purwaningsih, Wharyanti Ika Wicaksono, Bhayu Widhanarto, Ghanis Putra Widiastuti, Yulia Widyawati Widyawati Wihasti Imas Priyandani, Wihasti Imas Wijaya, David Sura Wikan Budi Utami Windriya, Anafil Windyandari, Aulia Windyandari Wirdiarti, Nuni Wiryanto Wiryanto Wulandari, Arum Nur Y Noenoek Andrijanti Yadi Ardiawan Yarmaidi Yarmaidi Yeti Sumiyati Yudanto, Yusuf Arya Yudi Pramono Pawiro, Yudi Pramono Yuli Budiati Yuli Kurniawati Sugiyo Pranoto, Yuli Kurniawati Sugiyo Yuli Utanto Yulia Neta . Yuliana, Dwi Yulianti, Fina Yuliyanti , Fina Yulyoni, Finni Yunita Wulandari Yusdiyanto Yusdiyanto Yusim, Adi Kurniawan Yusniar Hanani Yusniar Hanani D., Yusniar Yusniar Hanani Darundiati Yuyut Ariyanto, Yuyut Zainnur Wijayaanto Zainu, Danif Zamroni Zamroni Zuhdha Basofi Nugroho, Zuhdha Basofi Zulkarnain Ridlwan Zulkarnain Zulkarnain