Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.606
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika FKIP UM Metro Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA) Jurnal Pengabdian Magister Pendidikan IPA Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika Jurnal Edukasi Sumba (JES)
Melkianus Suluh
Pendidikan Fisika STKIP Weetebula
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Education Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Physics Other

Published : 16 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA)

 1 
Efektifitas Pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013 ditinjau dari Kesiapan Sekolah dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Perkembangan Sekolah Melkianus Suluh; Dekriati Ate
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): July
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v5i2.280

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) school readiness and response to the 2013 curriculum, (2) the effectiveness of the 2013 curriculum implementation on school development, (3) the supporting and inhibiting factors for the implementation of the 2013 curriculum in physics learning, and (4) Implementation of process standards and curriculum evaluation standards for 2013. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. The research subjects were Physics Teachers, Mathematics Teachers, and Indonesian Teachers. Research data was collected by conducting in-depth interviews. The results of the study show that: 1) the principal and teacher state the readiness for the implementation of the 2013 curriculum. 2) the application of the 2013 curriculum influences the efforts of schools to develop schools through increasing teacher human resources, providing supporting facilities and infrastructure and learning facilities; 3) supporting factors for the implementation of the 2013 curriculum are the availability of adequate teacher resources, the availability of adequate supporting facilities and infrastructure, the support of parents and the government, and the willingness of students. Meanwhile, the inhibiting factors are minimal learning media, limited student books, limited educational staff, readiness and teacher thinking methods that still use old learning patterns; 4) teachers have difficulty implementing scientific approach based learning due to lack of student enthusiasm, minimal learning media, limited laboratory and library facilities and infrastructure, for aspects of assessment teachers experience difficulties with the number of items and forms of assessment.Keywords: 2013 curriculum; School Readiness; School Development
TINGKAT PEMAHAMAN MAHASISWA TERHADAP PEDOMAN RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN (RPP) Melkianus Suluh; Yuliana Sesi Bitu
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018): July
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v4i2.282

Abstract

This study aims to: (1) determine the level of understanding of STKIP Weetebula students on RPP components, and (2) the ability of STKIP Weetebula students in preparing lesson plans. This research was conducted in Sumba Barat Daya District, East Nusa Tenggara. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. The research subjects were taken by purposive random sampling technique, as many as 40 people from 130 students spread over 4 study programs. Data collection uses an open questionnaire instrument and RPP format equipped with SK and KD according to the sub-field of research. The conclusion of the results of this study is first, students' understanding of the Learning Implementation Plan or RPP component is basically good, but in practice, students need to be trained to implement RPP. In addition, students 'understanding of the learning model needs to be improved, this is in line with the results of the students' work in preparing the student lesson plans, not paying enough attention to the model steps. Second, the ability to prepare lesson plans. Students in preparing lesson plans are generally good. The weakness of the student lies in the ability to describe KD in the form of indicators not yet answering the minimum KD standards, learning objectives have not shown goals that can be measured and achieved, to differentiate indicators from objectives, students only add student subjects, and use the same operational verbs for all purposes learning no mention of the forms of apperception activities carried out. At the core activities, the learning steps are not in accordance with the stages of the learning model, and in the final activity there is no explanation of the direct or indirect benefits of the material being taugh.Keywords: Student understanding, Learning Implementation Plan
Co-Authors Adriana Lali Wunda Angela Maricci Bili Apliana Ina Dekriati Ate Fakhruddin Uddin Herlina Umbu Pingge Jumadi Jumadi Maria Oktaviana Sakti Ate Oktavianus Deke Regina Wilhelmina Leda Ghoda Sene, Mikael Utu Lendi Wilhelmus, kii Yape Yohanis Umbu Kaleka, Yohanis Umbu Yuliana Sesi Bitu Yulita Adelfin Lede