Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Penelitian Saintek

ANALYSIS OF MIX DESIGN BETON HOW DOE (ENGLISH) AND ACI (AMERICA) Agus Santoso
Jurnal Penelitian Saintek Vol 7, No 1: April 2002
Publisher : Institute of Research and Community Services, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (5381.958 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/jps.v7i1.5427

Abstract

This research was aimed to describe concrete mix design using British DOE and American AC/ methods viewedfrom concrete compressive strength and cost per-m', The mix design research used materials of sand and split from Krasak River, Nusantara brand Portland cement, and ground water from Faculty of Engineering UNY They were 10 samples each methods of (J 5 x15 x 15) em dimension. The data were collected by meant of experiment in the Laboratory of Building Materials, Faculty of Engineering, UNY, and analyzed descriptively. The results were that, to design concrete with K.225 characteristic, the DOE method required mix composition of PC : sand: split  = I : 1,58:  3,49 with slump = 13 em, the average weight of concrete cubes = 8,066 kgs and characteristic of compressive strength  =   263,1 kg/em". The ACI method required mix composition of PC: sand: split = I: 2,24:  3,12, with slump = tcm  (slightly over the design value), the average weight of concrete cubes = 8,215 kgs, and characteristic of compressive strength =  284,73 kg/em', Based on the cost analysis, per-cube, the DOE method cost was Rp 215.906,- and the ACI method cost was Rp 195.791,-.. From the analysis, in general the AC/ method was more effective as well as efficient than DOE method.
PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION OF BEAM CONCRETE BEAMS TO INCREASE BUILDING STRUCTURE PERFORMANCE IN EARTHQUAKE AREA Agus Santoso; Slamet Widodo; Nuryadin Eko Raharjo
Jurnal Penelitian Saintek Vol 15, No 2: Oktober 2010
Publisher : Institute of Research and Community Services, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (6973.526 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/jps.v15i2.1756

Abstract

The paper  summarizes  the experimental  result of flexural  capacity of full scale reinforced concrete beam prepared  as a composite  members consisting  of two concrete layers  made of Hybrid Fiber Reinforced  Concrete (HFRC) and High Strength Concrete (HSC). Compressive  strength and modulus of elasticity test, splitting tensile, flexural  tensile tests conducted  to identify the important mechanical properties of both HFRC and HSC. Every mechanical properties data collected using 3 standard samples based on ASTM and SNI codes. 15 reinforced concrete beams in 150x250x2400 mm dimensions,  usedfor full  scale flexural   test of structural  RC beam.  The tests conducted  on 5 types of composite  beam: 100%, 75%, 50%, 25%, and 0% of HSC cross sectional depth, combined with HFRC for the opposite sides.The experimental results indicated that HFRC shows higher modulus elasticity compared with HSC, it was 28618,611MPafor  HFRC,  and 21790,660 MPafor HSC. All types of composite  members  and full   depth  of HFRC  shows  higher first   crack  load  capacity compared  with HSC structural reinforced  concrete  beam. The first  crack  load capacity increase ranging from 29,753%  up to 33,267%. All types of composite  members and full depth of HFRC also shows higher maximum load capacity compared with HSC structural reinforced concrete beam. The first  crack load capacity  increase ranging from  11,284% up to 16,03%. Based on the experimental  test results, it can be suggested  to apply partial depth of HSC and HFRC; 50% HSC and 50% HFRC on static determinate  RC beam.Keywords:  Composite Reinforced Concrete Beam, HFRC, HSC, Full Scale Flexural  Test