Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL IQTISAD: Reconstruction of Justice and Welfare for Indonesia Qistie: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosio Dialektika SYARIATI : Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hukum Al-Faruq
A. Saiful Aziz
Universitas Wahid Hasyim
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL IQTISAD: Reconstruction of Justice and Welfare for Indonesia

 1 
Analisis Hukum Islam Tentang Pendistribusian Zakat Fitrah oleh Takmir Masjid At-Taqwa Terhadap Gharim yang Hutangnya untuk Lembaga A Saiful Aziz; Subhan Subhan; Ubbadul Adzkiya'
Jurnal Iqtisad Vol 8, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Iqtisad
Publisher : Universitas Wahid Hasyim Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31942/iq.v8i2.5615

Abstract

This study describes how the implementation of zakat fitrah management at the At-Taqwa Mosque, Pamedaran Village, Brebes Town, and to find out the analysis of Islamic law on the distribution of zakat fitrah to people who have debts to institutions. This research was conducted with a qualitative method and a descriptive approach. The conclusion of the study shows: (1) Management of zakat fitrah at the At-Taqwa Mosque begins with planning through deliberations of leaders and amil on D-3 Eid al-Fitr and carried out on D-1 Eid al-Fitr with the time of collecting zakat fitrah from after dawn prayer until before prayer Asr, then the amil calculates the amount of zakat fitrah that has been collected, then distributes it to asnaf in the At-Taqwa Mosque environment, namely asnaf indigent, poor, amil, fisabilillah and gharim. (2) The distribution of zakat fitrah carried out by the takmir of the At-Taqwa Mosque in Pamedaran Village to gharim whose debts to institutions are not in accordance with Islamic law, because what is meant by gharim according to the four schools of thought is a person who is in debt and it is an obligation for him to pay the debt, while in this case the person who is considered a gharim is only an intermediary for the debt and the real owner of the debt is the institution/mosque.
REKONSEPTUALISASI TAFSIR ASAS PRADUGA TAK BERSALAH A. Saiful Aziz
Jurnal Iqtisad Vol 4, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Wahid Hasyim Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31942/iq.v4i1.1998

Abstract

ABSTRAK            Asas praduga tak bersalah dianggap  hanya  untuk  dan  berlaku bagi kegiatan yang berkaitan  dengan  proses  peradilan pidana. Sehingga terjadi ketidakpedulian masyarakat terhadap asas tersebut. Asas  praduga tak bersalah  di  Indonesia  dulu terdapat  di  dalam  Pasal 8 Undang-Undang No. 14 Tahun 1970 tentang Ketentuan-Ketentuan Pokok Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Meskipun tidak secara eksplisit menyatakan hal yang sama, asas tersebut  diutarakan  di  dalam  Pasal 66 Undang-Undang No.8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).Penegakkan hukum merupakan salah satu upaya untuk menciptakan tata tertib, keamanan dan ketentraman dalam masyarakat, baik itu merupakan usaha pencegahan maupun merupakan pemberantasan atau penindakan setelah terjadinya pelanggaran hukum. Untuk mencapai sasaran tersebut maka peraturan perundang-undangan menjadi dasar hukum bagi langkah dan tindakan dari penegak hukum harus sesuai dengan dasar falsafah negara dan pandangan hidup Bangsa Indonesia yaitu Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 (UUD 1945). Dengan demikian, Perlunya rekonseptualisasi atas tafsir asas praduga tidak bersalah (presumption of innocence) yang selama ini dianut KUHAP.        Kata kunci: Tafsir, Asas, Praduga tidak Bersalah.                                               AbstractThe principle of innocence presumption is presumed only for and applicable to activities relating to the criminal justice process. So there is a lack of concern for the community towards the principle. The principle of innocence presumption in Indonesia was previously contained in Article 8 of Law no. 14 of 1970 on the Basic Provisions of Judicial Power. Although it does not explicitly state the same, the principle was articulated in Article 66 of Law No.8 Year 1981 on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP).Law enforcement is one of the efforts to create order, security and peace in society, whether it is a preventive effort or is the eradication or repression after the violation of law. To achieve these targets, the legislation should be the legal basis for the actions and actions of law enforcers to be in accordance with the basic philosophy of the state and the Indonesian life view of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution (1945 Constitution). Thus, the need for a reconceptualization of the interpretation of the presumption of innocence principle adopted by the Criminal Procedure Code.Keywords: Tafsir, Principle, Presumption Presumption of Innocence
Karakteristik Hukum Islam dan Asas Penerapannya A Saiful Aziz
Jurnal Iqtisad Vol 6, No 2 (2019): IQTISAD
Publisher : Universitas Wahid Hasyim Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31942/iq.v6i2.3143

Abstract

Abstract Islamic Shari'ah is qadim, meaning that it has existed since before humans (society) existed, because it is the word of God or the words of Allah that is nafs azli which is not literate and has no sound. Because the law was made for humans, Allah revealed something that corrects this thinking in the proposal of fiqhi known as the proposition. These legal propositions are qath'iy and some are resistant to zhanniy. Therefore, Islamic law which is determined directly and affirmed by Allah, means that the laws are derived from the proposition that Qath'iy. The law that stipulates this is not much, and the law that leads to its development is known as sharia, the second law which is determined only by the points intended by the law established by the zhanni proposition. This law is clearly developed very much and can be developed with the term ijtihad.
PERATURAN PRESIDEN NOMOR 87 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG (PUNGUTAN LIAR) DALAM HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM A. Saiful Aziz
Jurnal Iqtisad Vol 3, No 1 (2016): iqtisad
Publisher : Universitas Wahid Hasyim Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31942/iq.v3i1.2463

Abstract

AbstrakSuap  atau  pungutan  liar di  jalan,  terutama dalam transportasi  barang di  jembatan timbang, di pelabuhan,di pajak cukai masih merajalela.Hal ini menyebabkan berbagai dampak negatif, seperti kecelakaan, kerusakan jalan dan hilangnya kas negara. Operasi tangkap tangan (OTT) kasus pungutan liar (pungli) perizinan di Kementerian perhubungan perintah langsung dari Presiden. Secara umum pungli sebagai pungutan yang dilakukan secara tidak sah atau melanggar aturan, oleh dan untuk kepentingan pribadi oknum petugas. Pungli merupakan penyalahgunaan wewenang. Pungutan liar dalam hukum pidana Islam, tindak pidana pungutan liar (pungli) yang terjadi di Indonesia saat ini masuk dalam kategori jarimah takzir.Metode Pendekatan Penelitian dan analisis dilakukan secara normatif yaitu data diperoleh dari penelitian pustaka (library research). Secara singkat diungkap metode penelitian untuk mengganti kerangka konseptual, pengkajian data sekunder berkaitan  dengan penyimpangan hukum dan eksistensi. Pungutan liar merupakan tindak-tindak pidana materil, dan bisa di beri sanksi pemecatan atau bahkan kurungan pidana hingga 20 tahun. Pungutan liar adalah jarimah takzir, sanksi pidana bagi pelaku pungutan liar yang dilakukan oleh pihak kementerian perhubungan dalam hukum Islam adalah al-‘azl (pemecatan). sanksi takzir yang berupa pemberhentian dari pekerjaan atau jabatan ini diterapkan terhadap setiap pegawai yang melakukan jarimah, baik yang berhubungan dengan pekerjaan atau jabatannya.Kata Kunci:Pungutan, Liar, Hukum, Pidana   Abstract  Bribe or illegal levy on street, especially  cargo transportation at weighbridge, at port, tax custom are still develope. Those are cause various negative effect, such as accident, road damage, and the lost of state income. Red-Handed Operation (Operasi Tangkap Tangan/OTT) on illegal levy case in Ministry of Transport is a direct command from President. Generally, illegal levy is a levy  done illegally for personal purposes. Illegal levy is an authority abuse. Illegal levy in Islamic penal code, criminal act on illegal levy in Indonesia nowdays including in category jarimah takzir. Illegal levy is material criminal acts and it may lead into duty dismissal, or jail sentence up to 20 years. Illegal levy is jarimah takzir, criminal sanction for illegal levy which conducted by Ministry of Transport in Islamic Law is al-‘azl (dismissal). Sanction of takzir can be duty dismissal from the occupation or the position is applicable to every employee commit jarimah, due to the occupation or the position.Key Words: Predident Regulation, Illegal Levy, Law, Islamic Penal Code
Co-Authors Choiriyah, Nur Fadlilatul Subhan Subhan Tri Handayani Ubbadul Adzkiya’ Ulumuddin, Imam Khoirul