Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Pena : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi

ISLAM, HAM DAN KONSTITUSIONALISME INDONESIA Taufiq Taufiq; Anik Kunantiyorini; Achmad Soeharto
Pena Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Teknologi Vol 36 (2022): EDISI KHUSUS PENELITIAN LPPM UNIKAL
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/jurnalpena.v36i0.1966

Abstract

The development of human rights as an intrinsic element that exists in humans has existed for a long time. Awareness of the existence of human rights, self-esteem, dignity and human dignity has actually been started since humans were on earth. This is because human rights have naturally existed since humans were born and are rights that are inherent and inseparable from human beings. The constitution in force in Indonesia recognizes that the position of human rights is very vital, although there are differences in terms of quality and quantity, especially in adopting human rights instruments, socio-political conditions which then have an influence on the contents of the constitution. Thus, it is clear that human rights are a basic need of society that must be contained in a constitution, as well as related to the basic values of the nation state itself.
KEADILAN DALAM OPTIK HUKUM ALAM DAN POSITIVISME HUKUM Achmad Soeharto
Pena Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Teknologi Vol 36 (2022): EDISI KHUSUS PENELITIAN LPPM UNIKAL
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/jurnalpena.v36i0.2013

Abstract

Natural law always measures and evaluates law in terms of justice, justice is an inseparable part of law, therefore the essence of law is justice. If the law is not fair, then according to natural law it is not law. Meanwhile, legal positivism measures and evaluates the law from the perspective of formal justice. The priority of justice as in natural law, is not a priority in legal positivism. For legal positivists, the most important thing is what the law is, not how the law should be. Even outside the law there is no law, the law must be in written form, to be able to provide legal certainty. With the different points of view of the two schools of law, until now there is no common ground between natural law and legal positivism in formulating justice. Each is adamant and differs in determining justice. Natural law is always ideal and places justice in the highest place. Justice is a priority that is non-negotiable and becomes the spirit of the law. Therefore the law must be fair and just is a constitutive element rather than the law. Meanwhile, justice in the perspective of legal positivism is limited to formal justice/procedural justice, or in other words, formalism justice that prioritizes form (written law)