Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2020 - 2025

5.212

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Paramita: Historical Studies Journal Abdimas Jurnal Daulat Hukum JESS (Journal of Educational Social Studies) Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) JPHI Cakrawala: Jurnal Litbang Kebijakan Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services SIGn Jurnal Hukum Law Research Review Quarterly East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR) Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (FJMR) Trunojoyo Law Review Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana Proceeding of International Conference on Science, Education, and Technology Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education JESS (Journal of Educational Social Studies) Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services "Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development " Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review

Martitah Martitah

Unknown Affiliation

Author-ID : 316624

Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Social Sciences

Published : 56 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Title

PROGRESIVITAS HAKIM KONSTITUSI DALAM MEMBUAT PUTUSAN (Analisis Terhadap Keberadaan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang bersifat Positive Legislature) Martitah Martitah
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jilid 41, Nomor 2, Tahun 2012
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Abstract Under Article 56 and Article 57 of Law Number 24 Year 2003 regarding the Constitutional Court, the position of the Constitutional Court in testing the law merely as a negative legislator. But from some of the existing ruling, the Constitutional Court made several decisions that sometimes are not just cancel the norm, but also make decisions that are set (positive Legislature). In the juridical-normative perspective, the actions of the judicial activism that led to the positive position of the Legislature is a violation of boundary signs. However, if the study, some of the Constitutional Court ruling that the Legislature containing positive showing a progressive law enforcement side. Therefore, the next question is, why the judge in the Constitutional Court Act makes testing positive verdict Legislature. To answer these questions, is used qualitative research methods with the paradigms of constructivism and hermeneutic approach to the socio-legal research. From this research can be concluded that positive legislature decisions made are based on legal considerations, philosophical and sociological considerations which can not be separated from interpretation of the law. Law is not only seen from the perspective of law texts, but in context to realize the benefits and justice. In this context, the law enforcement of the Constitutional Court can be categorized as a form of progressive law enforcement. Key words: progression, decision, Positive Legislature abstrak Berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 56 dan Pasal 57 Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi, kedudukan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam pengujian undang-undang hanya sebatas sebagai negative legislator. Namun dari beberapa putusan yang ada, Mahkamah Konstitusi terkadang membuat beberapa putusan yang tidak hanya membatalkan norma, melainkan juga membuat putusan yang bersifat mengatur (positive legislature). Dalam perspektif yuridis-normatif, tindakan aktivisme yudisial yang mengarah pada kedudukan positive legislature tersebut adalah sebuah pelanggaran rambu pembatas. Namun demikian, apabila telaah, beberapa putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang mengandung positive legislature tersebut menampakkan segi penegakan hukum yang progresif. Karena itu yang menjadi pertanyaan selanjutnya adalah, mengapa hakim MK dalam pengujian UU membuat putusan positive legislature. Untuk menjawab pertanyaan tersebut, digunakanlah metode penelitian kualitatif dengan paradigma konstruktivisme dan pendekatan hermeneutik pada penelitian socio-legal. Dari penelitian yang dilakukan, didapatkanlah kesimpulan bahwasanya dibuatnya putusan yang bersifat mengatur tersebut didasarkan pada pertimbangan hukum, filosofis dan sosiologis yang tidak terlepas dari penafsiran hukum. Hukum tidak hanya dilihat dari kacamata teks undang-undang belaka, melainkan menghidupkan kemaslahatan dalam kontektualitasnya. Dalam kontek ini penegakan hukum di Mahkamah Konstitusi dapat dikategorikan sebagai bentuk penegakan hukum yang progresif. Kata kunci : Progresifitas, Putusan , Positive Legislature

ANOTASI PUTUSAN ULTRA PETITA DALAM LINGKUP PERADILAN ADMINISTRASI DI INDONESIA Martitah Martitah
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 43, No 1 (2014): Masalah-Masalah Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

The existence of administrative tribunals in Indonesia is one of the rechtsstaat pillars. The decision of the Administrative Court is expected to be the main instrument of dispute fulfillment and justice message. Therefore, in accordance with the principle of dominus litis, judges are required to maximize its role in the fulfillment of disputes, including to make dictum of ultra petita, so may reflect society's sense of law justice.Ultra petita decision in the Administrative Court have diverse characters, ultra petita of reformatio in peius, reformatio in melius, repeating the command process, the cancellation decision is not the object of dispute, but is materially related to the object of dispute, the addition of a substantial amar and amar that is declarative.

Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Aditya Irvine Raiza, Faiz Aini, Triska Rahmatul Ali Masyhar Alkhair, Rayyan Amelia Eka Rahmawati andaniswari, okky Anis Widyawati Anitasari, Rahayu Fery Arif Hidayat Arif Hidayat Bagus Setyadi, Hudha Bambang Irawan Bayangsari Wedhatami Dani Muhtada Desi Nurlaeli , Putri Dewi Liesnoor Setyowati Dewi Sulistianingsih Driyah S, Duhita Dyajeng Ayu Musdalifah Eko Handoyo Eko Handoyo Eko Handoyo Eko Mukminto Fachruddin, Mohammad Reza Fahritsani, Husna Fauzan, Moh. Mustakim Fauzi, Agvin Ghazali, Rusman Gulo, Elisari Guspita, Ardhianing Hermawan, Adellya Salsabilla Hidayatuzzakia, Hana Ilmiyah, Nofika Jihan Pinasti, Kana JOKO SUSANTO Kristiono, Natal M Riski Amin M Marlianawati, Fitria Masrukhi Masrukhi Masrukhi Masrukhi Maulana, Abdul Muftar Rifki Miftahjannah, Ananda Moh. Solehatul Mustofa Moh. Solehatul Mustofa Moh. Solehatul Mustofa Mohd Yusoff, Rahmawati Muchammad Shidqon Prabowo Muhklasin, Raden Muhammad Mukti, Wisnu Ali Muna, Khozainul Musafa, Alief Qurratul Ain Naelufar, Rizqan Nor Fitriana, Desy Noviani Achmad Putri Noviani Achmad Putri Noviani Achmad Putri NUR FADILAH Pohan, Choirul Rohmiyanti Pramudita, Wahyu Sinta Dewi Prasetyo, Yusuf Dwi Pujiono Pujiono Putra, Tegar Islami Rahman, Abdul Haris Bahtiar Rahman, Malik Akbar Mulki Rahmayani, Chanidia Ari Ratih Damayanti Retnani, Diyah Satya Retno Ulinnuha, Retno Ristina Yudhanti Rodiyah - Rusdarti - Sarah Atikasari Sari, Gholin Noor Aulia Saru Arifin Shaidah, Zahra Az Slamet Sumarto Subagyo Subagyo Suciati, Cita Dharma Mulya Sudiami, Dinok SUGIARTO, LAGA Thriwaty Arsal Tri Marhaeni Pudji Astuti Wafiroh, Avina Wardhani, Putri Kusuma Wasino Wasino Widiyanto Widiyanto Widiyanto Yuli Prasetyo Adhi YYFR. Sunarjan, YYFR. Zahra Az Sha’idah

Title Search

Found 2 Documents Search Journal : Masalah-Masalah Hukum

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Masalah-Masalah Hukum