Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search
Journal : AKSIOMA

PENERAPAN PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR SISWA KELAS VIII MTSN 4 KOTA PALU: The Application Of Problem-Based Learning To Improve Learning Outcomes In The Material Flat-Sided Space Building Material VIII MTsN 4 Kota Palu Gayatri, Refma; Rochaminah, Sutji; Hadjar, Ibnu; Nurhayadi, Nurhayadi
Aksioma Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): AKSIOMA
Publisher : Universitas Tadulako

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22487/aksioma.v13i2.4371

Abstract

This study aims to describe the application of problem-based learning to improve learning outcomes on the topic of plane solid figures for eighth-grade students at MTs.N 4 Kota Palu. This research is a classroom action research that follows the Kemmis and McTaggart design, which includes planning, action implementation, observation, and reflection. The subjects of this study were all 30 students of class VIII B enrolled in the 2023/2024 academic year. The study consists of two cycles, each with two meetings. The results of this study show an improvement in student learning outcomes from cycle I to cycle II, indicated by the increase in the number of students who achieved the minimum completeness criteria overall. In cycle I, 16.67% or 5 students met the minimum completeness criteria. In cycle II, the number of students meeting the minimum completeness criteria increased to 73.33% or 22 students. The results of teacher activity observation were in the good category with a score of 80% in cycle I, which increased to 84.83% in cycle II. The results of student activity observation in cycle I were in the good category and improved to the very good category in cycle II. Therefore, it can be concluded that the application of problem-based learning can improve student learning outcomes using the following phases: (1) Orienting students to the problem, in phase 1, students engage directly with the topic by relating the problem to real-life situations. (2) Organizing students for learning, in phase 2, students form predetermined study groups to complete the LKPD, with the researcher considering the students' familiarity with one another. (3) Guiding individual and group investigations, in phase 3, students express their ideas through group discussions with the researcher's assistance. (4) Developing and presenting work, in phase 4, students randomly present their group's work with good topic mastery and responsibility within their group. (5) Analyzing and evaluating the problem-solving process, in phase 5, students analyze the presentation results with intellectual ability, identify errors, explain correct answers, and summarize findings to construct knowledge from group work.
ANALISIS KESALAHAN DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL PERSAMAAN LOGARITMA SISWA KELAS X MIA 1 SMAN 1 SINDUE TOBATA : Analysis of Errors in Solving Logarithm Equation Problems of Class X MIA 1 Students SMAN 1 Sindue Tobata Alam, Hitman; Paloloang, Baharuddin; Hasbi, Muh.; Rochaminah, Sutji
Aksioma Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): AKSIOMA
Publisher : Universitas Tadulako

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22487/aksioma.v14i1.4378

Abstract

The aim of this research is to obtain a description of the error analysis in solving logarithmic equation questions for Class X MIA 1 SMAN 1 Sindue Tobata students according to the Kastolan indicator. Kastolan indicators include, Conceptual Errors, Procedural Errors, and Technical Errors. This type of research is qualitative research. The subjects in this research were 2 students taken from 24 students of class X MIA 1 SMAN 1 Sindue Tobata in the even semester 2023/2024. Subjects were chosen by considering 1) the student made more mistakes than other students, 2) the errors varied. Data was obtained from the results of written tests and interviews with research subjects. The results of this research show that mistakes made by students in the Kastolan indicators that have been determined are conceptual errors by not being able to choose the formula/property of logarithms correctly. The causal factor is that students do not understand the concept of logarithms presented by the teacher. Procedural errors are indicated by errors in answering questions which result in the steps written by students being wrong and also not being completed until the final answer. The causal factor is that students do not understand how to determine the steps to solve logarithmic equations in their simplest form. Technical errors where students make mistakes in calculating operations or make mistakes in moving numbers or calculation operations from one step to the next, the factor causing this error is that students make mistakes in operating the numbers.
PROFIL BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA KELAS VIII MTs ALKHAIRAAT MALENI DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINEAR DUA VARIABEL: Critical Thinking Analysis Of Class VIII Students At Mts Al Khairaat Maleni In Solving Problems Of Two Variables Linear Equation System Mardiana, Nanang; Paloloang, Baharuddin; Hasbi, Muh.; Rochaminah, Sutji
Aksioma Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): AKSIOMA
Publisher : Universitas Tadulako

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22487/aksioma.v14i1.4385

Abstract

This study aims to obtain a description of students' critical thinking in solving problems on the system of linear equations of two variables at MTs Alkhairaat Maleni. This type of research is descriptive with a qualitative approach. The subjects in this study were students of class VIII B MTs Alkhairaat Maleni consisting of three people, namely one student each with high, medium and low mathematics abilities. Data collection techniques used written tests and interviews. The results of this study indicate that (1) The critical thinking profile of subjects with high mathematics ability is a subject who is able to master the FRISCO indicators (focus, reason, inference, situation, clarity, and overview). Subjects with moderate mathematics ability are subjects who only partially master the FRISCO indicators, namely the subject does not provide the right reasons to support the conclusions he makes (reason). The subject determines the steps to solve the problem. But the subject is less precise in concluding the solution to the problem (inference). The subject with low mathematics ability, namely the subject who also partially mastered the FRISCO indicator, namely the subject also gave inappropriate reasons to support the conclusions he made (reason). The subject determines the first step in solving the problem. But in solving the problem the subject is not correct in determining the solution strategy (inference). The subject did not use all the information that was in accordance with the problem in the problem (situation). The subject did not recheck what had been done (overview).
PROFIL KEMAMPUAN PEMBUKTIAN MATEMATIKA MENGGUNAKAN METODE INDUKSI MATEMATIK SISWA KELAS XI SMAN 5 MODEL PALU DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR Jusmawati, Jusmawati; Paloloang, Baharuddin; Rochaminah, Sutji; Hasbi, Muh.
Aksioma Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): AKSIOMA
Publisher : Universitas Tadulako

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22487/aksioma.v14i2.5311

Abstract

This study aims to describe the ability of mathematical proof using mathematical induction method of students who have visual, auditorial and kinesthetic learning styles. The subjects of this research are 3 students who are representatives of each learning style, namely 1 student who has a visual learning style, 1 student who has an auditory learning style and 1 student who has a kinesthetic learning style. This research is a descriptive research that describes students' mathematical proof ability using mathematical induction method adapted to visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. The results showed that students with visual and auditorial learning styles were able to perform mathematical proof using mathematical induction in the basic steps and induction steps but only up to the correct assumption for n = k while students with kinesthetic learning styles could not apply the principle of mathematical induction correctly, in th basic steps students substituted n = 1 and n = 2 into the statement and ther were error in arithmetic operations.
Co-Authors Abd Hamid Abd. Hamid Abd. Hamid Abd. Hamid Abd.Hamid Abd.Hamid Agnes Desy Leliana Ahdar Akbar, Guntur Moh. Akhyar H. M. Tawil Alam, Hitman Alfiliansi Alfiliansi, Alfiliansi Ananta, Puja Asti Anggraini Anggraini Anggraini Anggraini Anggraini Anriani, Anriani Apriyanti Wulandari Arfanuddin, Arfanuddin Arifa Nur Ayu Ashar Ashar Ashar Ayu, Arifa Nur Badjeber, Rafiq Baharuddin Baharuddin Baharuddin Baharuddin Paloloang Baharuddin Paloloang Baharuddin Paloloang Baid, Nurfaida Bakri Bakri Bakri Bakri Bakri M Bakri Mallo Bakri Mallo Barakati, Intan Faramita Basri, Risna Chairani, Munajah Chatarina Umbul Wahyuni Dasa Ismaimuza Deviana, Sri Dewi Puspita Dewi Safitri DIAN APRIANI Dianra, Atmika Radifa Djafar, Yuniarti H Dyantari, Putu Eka Sutarsi Sagita Ermayanti, Ni Luh Evie Awuy Evie Awuy Fini Widyawati Hi. Hafid Fitri, Rinil Fitrianti Fitrianti Gandung Sugita Gayatri, Refma Guntur Moh. Akbar Hadija Hadija Hadija Hajerina, Hajerina Haliza Hapsa Hasanuddin, Mutiah Hatin, Murni A. Hedarwati, Hedarwati Henita Rahmayanti Herdawati Herdawati Herdawati, Herdawati Huber Yaspin Tandi I Nyoman Murdiana I Nyoman Murdiana Ibni Hadjar Intan Faramita Barakati Istiqomah Jaeng, Maxinus Jemamut, Natalia Jusmawati Jusmawati, Jusmawati Karniman, Tegoeh S Karniman, Tegoeh S. Kasim, Sitti Ruqaiyyah Laksono Trisnantoro Lamanja, Nurannisa S Lantang, Nortje D.J. Lilis, Lilis liloi, olvi M, Bakri M. Ikhsan M., Bakri Malia Fitriani Mardiana, Nanang Mastura, Ayu Maxinus Jaeng Mecawati, Niluh Putu Ayu Meinarni, Welli Mirnawati Mirnawati Moh. Rian Firdaus Mu’afiah, Ummi Muh Hasbi Muh Hasbi Muh. Hasbi Muh. Hasbi Muh. Rizal Muh. Rizal Muliyati Muliyati, Muliyati Munajah Chairani Musdalifah Musdalifah Musfira, Musfira MUSTAMIN IDRIS Mustamin Idris Ndawu, Tirta Andriani Nggariwo, Febryanti Ni Made Sari Indahyani Niluh Putu Ayu Mecawati Nimsing Nimsing Nofriana Tolabada Novia Astriani Nur Anisa Nur Islamiah, Nur Nur Islamiyah Nur Safitri Nurannisa S Lamanja Nurfadila Nurfadila, Nurfadila Nurhayadi Nurhikmah Nurhikmah Nursupiamin Nursupiamin, Nursupiamin Paloloang, Muhammad Fachri B Paloloang, Muhammad Fachri B. Putu Dyantari Rafiqa, Shara Rahayu, Wan Indra Ari Rajab Rajab Rajab, Rajab Rifai, Mohammad Rifal, Mohammad Rita Lefrida Rita Lefrida Rizka Amalia Rohmah, Zakiah Roni Dudung Paembonan Rosyidah, Anni Syakhiyatur Safira Afrilia Sari, Nurhalisa Fitra Sasmitha Puri Indah SATRIYAS ILYAS Siti Hadijah Siti Hadijah Siti Helmyati Siti Maryam Sitti Ruqaiyyah Kasim Sry Yasma Suciati, Indah Sudarman Bennu Sudarsono Sukayasa Tegoeh S Karniman Tegoeh S. Karniman Tirta Andriani Ndawu Ummi Mu’afiah Unggul Wahyono Uswatun Hasanah USWATUN HASANAH WAHYUNI Widyawati, Fini Wulandari, Apriyanti Zakiah Rohmah