Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
8.983
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha Lentera Hukum Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat Jurnal Hukum Novelty PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Pembaharuan Hukum Jurnal Akta International Journal of Law Reconstruction Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Jurnal Selat Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Widya Yuridika WAJAH HUKUM Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Unes Law Review Jambura Law Review Jurnal Restorative Justice Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam JUSTISI ADIL : Jurnal Hukum SIGn Jurnal Hukum Journal of Law and Policy Transformation JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Jurnal Yustisiabel Eksekusi : Journal Of Law Legal Spirit ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Journal of Judicial Review Batulis Civil Law Review Jurnal Bedah Hukum PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review Audi Et AP : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Jurnal Legisia Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Mediasas : Media Ilmu Syari'ah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah SASI Abdurrauf Journal of Community Service Lex Scientia Law Review
Lu Sudirman
Universitas Internasional Batam
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 80 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum

 1 
POLEMIK IMPLEMENTASI PEMBERIAN HAK RESTITUSI DALAM TPPO: PERDAGANGAN ORANG ATAU PEKERJA MIGRAN ILEGAL? Siahaan, Hervyan; Sudirman, Lu; Girsang, Junimart
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2023): September
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v7i2.7608

Abstract

Fulfilling justice for trafficking victims is not enough to be imprisoned alone but must come to the recovery of the suffering losses of trafficking victims. In Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of Trafficking in Persons, it stipulates the rights that can be given to victims, one of which is the right to restitution that must be given by traffickers as compensation to victims, in this case based on District Court Decision Number: 109 / Pid.Sus / 2022 / PN Tp, the defendant was convicted in accordance with the second alternative charge JPU Article 81 Jo Article 69 of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2017 concerning the Protection of Migrant Workers as amended by Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation Jo Article 55 paragraph (1) to – 1 of the Penal Code with a prison sentence of 10 (ten) years and a fine of IDR 1,000,000,000 (one billion rupiah). The method used in this study is normative-empirical legal research by examining actual actions in the form of legal documents (judges' decisions) which are then adjusted to applicable rules and regulations, information collected through online literature searches, books, and related regulations. In this legal research, legal approaches, conceptual approaches, and case approaches will be used, along with specific research needs. In this study, primary and secondary legal materials were used. The legal material analyzed is presented methodically, logically, and reasonably. Based on the findings of the study, it can be concluded that the conviction in the judgment number 109/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Tp by being convicted of legally and convincingly violating the articles contained in the PMI Law, justice for victims is not fulfilled where  the type of crime is a criminal offense that is not included in the provisions of article 2 paragraph (1) letter a of Perma Number 1 of 2022.
POLEMIK IMPLEMENTASI PEMBERIAN HAK RESTITUSI DALAM TPPO: PERDAGANGAN ORANG ATAU PEKERJA MIGRAN ILEGAL? Siahaan, Hervyan; Sudirman, Lu; Girsang, Junimart
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): September
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v7i2.7608

Abstract

Fulfilling justice for trafficking victims is not enough to be imprisoned alone but must come to the recovery of the suffering losses of trafficking victims. In Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of Trafficking in Persons, it stipulates the rights that can be given to victims, one of which is the right to restitution that must be given by traffickers as compensation to victims, in this case based on District Court Decision Number: 109 / Pid.Sus / 2022 / PN Tp, the defendant was convicted in accordance with the second alternative charge JPU Article 81 Jo Article 69 of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2017 concerning the Protection of Migrant Workers as amended by Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation Jo Article 55 paragraph (1) to – 1 of the Penal Code with a prison sentence of 10 (ten) years and a fine of IDR 1,000,000,000 (one billion rupiah). The method used in this study is normative-empirical legal research by examining actual actions in the form of legal documents (judges' decisions) which are then adjusted to applicable rules and regulations, information collected through online literature searches, books, and related regulations. In this legal research, legal approaches, conceptual approaches, and case approaches will be used, along with specific research needs. In this study, primary and secondary legal materials were used. The legal material analyzed is presented methodically, logically, and reasonably. Based on the findings of the study, it can be concluded that the conviction in the judgment number 109/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Tp by being convicted of legally and convincingly violating the articles contained in the PMI Law, justice for victims is not fulfilled where  the type of crime is a criminal offense that is not included in the provisions of article 2 paragraph (1) letter a of Perma Number 1 of 2022.
Co-Authors ., Jane Abao, Grace Angela Adristy, Baiq Shefania Agustianto Agustianto Agustianto, Agustianto Agustini, Shenti Ahmad, Faradina Alhakim, Abdurrakhman Amboro, F. Yudhi Priyo Amboro, Florianus Yudhi Priyo Antony, Antony Ayunda, Rahmi Bago, Ester Intensis Bayu Anggara, Sultan Celline, Celline Chairunnisa Chairunnisa Dhani, Ayen Sephia Disemadi, Hari Sutra Elza Syarief, Elza Eny, Eny Farahdina, Farahdina Febriyani, Emiliya Ferryanto, Justitia Fiorentine, Jasisca Fitri, Winda Girsang, Junimart Guswandi, Cynthia Putri Haris, Muhammad Tan Abdul Rahman Haryati, Lily Henry Soelistyo Budi, Henry Soelistyo Heru Susetyo Hutahuruk, Rufinus Hutauruk, Rufinus Hotmaulana Insti, Putri Deviana Irawati, Jovita Iswara, Vizta Dana Jaya, Febri Jerryen, Jerryen Jonkarlo, Edson Jonker Sihombing Julvina, Julvina Jur. M. Udin Silalahi Karim, Justin Joy Lee, Michelle Lendrawati Lendrawati, Lendrawati Lie, Cindy Maharani Siregar, Ghea Regita Malau, Hotmaulina Manurung, Kevin John Paul Manurung, Shenti Agustini Mrs. Feronica Naga Wijaya, Hendry Nurfitri, Nisa Nurlaily NURLAILY, NURLAILY Oktavia, Ariani Park, Jihyun Prastiyo, La Ode Agung Priyo Amboro, Florianus Yudhi Rina Shahriyani Shahrullah Ritonga, Moehammad Mahastar Romadona, Hanifah Ghafila Sahputra, Rendi Santoso, Deddy saputra tanwir, yopta eka Saputra, Dedi Eka Sari, Rayon Seroja, Triana Dewi Seroja, Triana Dwi Setiawan, Marthalia Siahaan, Hervyan Siburian, Hasoloan Silviani, Ninne Zahara Sirait, Regina Ulianna Siregar, Zulhirdan Situmeang, Ampuan Sohheng, Nipon Sulastri Sulastri Syrief, Elza Tan, David Tan, Winsherly Tobing, Dian Riama L Tobing, Joel Jordan Tony Tony Trisetyo, Muhammad Dhimas Wagiman, Wagiman Warianto, Wahyudi Windi Afdal, Windi Zulfi, Natasya Artameivia