Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.182
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mandala: Jurnal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional Indonesian Journal of International Relations Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum Indonesian Journal of Global Discourse Al-fiqh : Journal of Islamic Studies Jurnal Pelita Nusantara : Kajian Ilmu Sosial Multidisiplin AL-SULTHANIYAH
Mahmuluddin
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : AL-SULTHANIYAH

 1 
Governance Structures: Comparing Presidential and Parliamentary Systems on Accountability, Efficiency, and Economic Outcomes Mahmuluddin
AL-SULTHANIYAH Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): AL-SULTHANIYAH
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/al-sulthaniyah.v13i2.3378

Abstract

This study provides a comparative evaluation of two dominant governance structures—presidential and parliamentary systems—focusing on their institutional efficiency, accountability, and economic outcomes. Through a review of existing literature and case studies, the research identifies key distinctions between these systems. Presidential systems, characterized by strong centralized executive authority, often struggle with transparency and accountability, leading to bureaucratic inefficiencies. In contrast, parliamentary systems typically foster greater decentralization and consultation, promoting higher levels of accountability and transparency. Economically, countries under presidential governance tend to experience slower GDP growth, higher inflation, and increased income inequality, with growth rates averaging 0.6 to 1.2 percentage points lower than those under parliamentary governance. This is partly attributed to policies that often favor elite interests. Using a qualitative comparative approach, the study analyzes a range of case studies and policy outcomes, concluding that parliamentary systems, despite some challenges, offer superior institutional efficiency, greater accountability, and better economic performance. As a result, parliamentary systems are suggested to be a more favorable governance model in terms of transparency, decentralized governance, and economic outcomes.
Co-Authors Asyidiqi, Hasbi Ayu Putri Khairunnisa Estriani, Heavy Nala Khairur Rizki Muhammad Haikal Muhammad Sood, Muhammad Sri Maryanti Wahyudin, Y. A. Wahyudin, Y.A. Zulkarnaen Zulkarnain