Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2020 - 2025

9.191

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal Kertha Semaya Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Jurnal Jatiswara Journal of Law Science Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum jurnal ilmiah hospitality JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan) JURNAL DE JURE MUHAMMADIYAH CIREBON LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Muhakkamah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram Indonesia Berdaya Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) PROFICIO: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Empiricism Journal Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains IBLAM Law Review JSIP: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah Bacarita Law Journal Jurnal Pengabdian Ruang Hukum Commerce Law Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian dan Inovasi Jurnal Ilmiah Dan Karya Mahasiswa Law and Economics Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia Journal of Community Empowerment Ulil Albab

Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara

Magister Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram

Author-ID : 559505

Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 66 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Title

THE EXECUTORIAL FORCE OF RULING OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURT AND THE IMPLICATIONS IN PRACTICE Gatot Dwi Hendro Wibowo, Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara &
Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Vol 2, No 4 (2014): UTOPIA HUKUM - KESEJAHTERAAN
Publisher : Jurnal IUS

This thesis entitled force executorial administrative court ruling and the implications in practice, discusses the mechanism of execution of the decision of the Administrative Court, the obstacles in the process of execution of the decision of the Administrative Court and the efforts that are made to the administrative court ruling that is not carried by the official / TUN Agency . This type of research is normative and assisted legal research / materials reinforced with empirical law in order to simplify and refine the analysis . The approach used is legislation approach , conceptual approach , approach cases , comparative approach . So that research results can be drawn that the mechanism of execution of court decisions TUN namely : Decision inkracht , after 60 working days the defendant did not perform its obligations , the decision has no legal force again and turns 90 working days of the obligation is not performed , the plaintiff filed a petition to the President of the Court order the court ordered defendant to implement the decision of the court , the defendant is not willing to implement the decision inkracht forceful measures imposed in the form of payment of a sum of money and forced or administrative sanctions and announced in local print media by him, since non-compliance of the court and the chairman shall submit to the President as the highest authority for TUN ordered officials to implement the courtâs decision . So there was a bottleneck in the execution of the ruling Justice TUN namely : Verdict Amar , execution barriers TUN official verdict is due to the position of Regional Chief Political Officer , execution barriers TUN official verdict caused the accused are officials who received the delegation of authority false , barriers of understanding TUN officials the State âs theory of law and AAUPB , technical barriers , barriers juridical ; Barriers related to legal principles , barriers in terms of the limited authority of judges , Barriers due to changes in the system of regional autonomy , Barriers due to noncompliance TUN officials and effort to do the administrative court ruling are not carried by the official / TUN Agency as criminal Attempts by the police to file a criminal report with the basic law 216 of the Criminal Code and civil efforts filed a lawsuit in state court using Article 1365 of the Civil Code as the basis for a lawsuit .Keywords : executorial power , Mechanisms , Barriers and Efforts .

KOMPETENNSI ABSOLUT PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA PENGADAAN TANAH BAGI PEMBANGUNAN UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM Dani Elfah; Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara; Ikang Satrya Medyantara
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 6, No 3 (2018)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Perolehan tanah untuk kepentingan umum dapat ditempuh melalui pengadaan tanah.Pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum memerlukan persetujuan dari pihak yang berhak. Oleh karena pihak yang berhak tidak bersedia melepaskan hak atas tanah, maka timbul sengketa antara instansi yang memerlukan tanah dan pihak yang berhak. Sifat sengketa dalam pengadaan tanah adalah sengketa tata usaa negara dan sengketa keperdataan. Penyelesaian sengketa dalam pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan ditempuh melalui musyawarah antara instansi yang memerlukan tanah dan pihak yang berhak, gugatan, atau keberatan kepada pengadilan.Sisten hukum tanah nasional yang berlaku di Indonesia sebagaimana tercermin di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria mengakui dan menghormati hak masyarakat atas tanah dan benda yang berkaitan dengan tanah. Negara tidak hanya sebatas mengakui dan menghormati hak masyarakat atas tanah dan benda yang berkaitan dengan tanah, akan tetapi memberi perlindungan terhadap harta benda setiap orang yang berada dibawaha kekuasaannya dan Negara menjamin terhadap hak milik tidak boleh diambil alih secara sewenang-wenang oleh siapapun termasuk pemerintah.

THE EXECUTORIAL FORCE OF RULING OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURT AND THE IMPLICATIONS IN PRACTICE Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara & Gatot Dwi Hendro Wibowo
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 2, No 1 (2014): UTOPIA HUKUM - KESEJAHTERAAN
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

This thesis entitled force executorial administrative court ruling and the implications in practice, discusses the mechanism of execution of the decision of the Administrative Court, the obstacles in the process of execution of the decision of the Administrative Court and the efforts that are made to the administrative court ruling that is not carried by the official / TUN Agency . This type of research is normative and assisted legal research / materials reinforced with empirical law in order to simplify and refine the analysis . The approach used is legislation approach , conceptual approach , approach cases , comparative approach . So that research results can be drawn that the mechanism of execution of court decisions TUN namely : Decision inkracht , after 60 working days the defendant did not perform its obligations , the decision has no legal force again and turns 90 working days of the obligation is not performed , the plaintiff filed a petition to the President of the Court order the court ordered defendant to implement the decision of the court , the defendant is not willing to implement the decision inkracht forceful measures imposed in the form of payment of a sum of money and forced or administrative sanctions and announced in local print media by him, since non-compliance of the court and the chairman shall submit to the President as the highest authority for TUN ordered officials to implement the court’s decision . So there was a bottleneck in the execution of the ruling Justice TUN namely : Verdict Amar , execution barriers TUN official verdict is due to the position of Regional Chief Political Officer , execution barriers TUN official verdict caused the accused are officials who received the delegation of authority false , barriers of understanding TUN officials the State ‘s theory of law and AAUPB , technical barriers , barriers juridical ; Barriers related to legal principles , barriers in terms of the limited authority of judges , Barriers due to changes in the system of regional autonomy , Barriers due to noncompliance TUN officials and effort to do the administrative court ruling are not carried by the official / TUN Agency as criminal Attempts by the police to file a criminal report with the basic law 216 of the Criminal Code and civil efforts filed a lawsuit in state court using Article 1365 of the Civil Code as the basis for a lawsuit .Keywords : executorial power , Mechanisms , Barriers and Efforts .

Co-Authors Abdul Hafid Abi Harun Arroisi Ady Supryadi Afrihadi, Faisal Agustinus F. Paskalino Dadi Alpan Hadi Arief Fahmi Lubis Asmuni Asmuni Baiq Silvia Yustiari Baiq Silvia Yustiari Baiq Silvia Yustiari Burhanuddin Burhanuddin Dani Elfah Dewanti, Yuvana Dewi Komalasari Dewi, Anies Prima Edy Sony Efendi Kusnandar Ernesta Arita Ari Erwin, Yulias Fadil, Lalu Muhammad Fikri, Zainul Gede Harimbawa Guntur Ilman Putra Guntur Ilman Putra Hani Usmandani Haq, Hilman Syarial Harun, Rina Rohayu Hasanah , Siti Hasyim, Hafid Heri Budianto Idhar Idhar Idhar, Idhar Ihsan, Khaerul Ikang Satrya Medyantara Imalah Imran Imran IRMAN PUTRA Johny Koynja Jumawal, Jumawal Kaspul Hadi Khaerul Ihsan Kukoh Iqbal Kusnandar, Efendi Lalu Rakhmat Suryaningrat Lukman Lukman Lukman LUKMAN, LUKMAN M. Dawud Rizkyandi Muhaemin Muhaemin Muhammad Padil Akbar Mukhlishin, Mukhlishin Nasaruddin Nasaruddin Nasaruddin Nasution Nasution Nasution Nasution Nurdin Nurdin Nurjannah Septyanun Nyiayu Arma Nurlailiy Nyiayu Arma Nurlailiy Pratama, Inka Nusamuda Primasari, Shinta Putra, Guntur Ilman Ridwan, Ridwan Rina Rohayu Harun Rizan, Lalu Samsu S, Nurjannah Sahlan Sahlan Sahrul, Sahrul Sakaki Sakaki Salahudin Salahudin Salahudin Salahudin Samsul Hadi Santi Mandasari Sarip, Sarip Shinta Primasari Siti Hasanah Siti Hasanah Siti Hasanah Siti Hasanah Siti HasanahSiti Hasanah Sri Solehah Suhaep Ashady Suhartono Suhartono Suyadi Suyadi Syafruddin Syafruddin Syamsuddin Syamsuddin Syamsuddin Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman Tauhid, Tauhid Ufran Ufran, Ufran Usman Munir Wardika, Made Wijatono, Setia Yogi Hadi Ismanto Yulias Erwin

Title Search

Found 3 Documents Search Journal : Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan)

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan)