Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.704
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Economic Education Analysis Journal NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Lingua Rima: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal Journal of Training and Community Service Adpertisi Journal of Biological Science and Education Nanggroe: Journal Of Scholarly Service Nanggroe: Journal of Scholarly Service International Journal of Law and Society
Khaeriyah Khaeriyah, Khaeriyah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : International Journal of Law and Society

 1 
Comparative Analysis of Development Administration Models Between Developed and Developing Countries Wahyudi Mokobombang; Khaeriyah, Khaeriyah
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i4.796

Abstract

This research compares development administration models between developed and developing countries. Using comparative analysis, this study evaluates policies and best practices from both contexts. Research findings reveal significant differences in development approaches and outcomes, as well as implications for policy development. The analysis demonstrates that developed countries predominantly employ post-bureaucratic, participatory, and innovation-driven models characterized by strong institutional capacity, high levels of digitalization, decentralized decision-making, and robust accountability mechanisms. In contrast, developing countries frequently rely on hybrid models combining traditional bureaucratic structures with nascent reforms, constrained by limited resources, capacity gaps, institutional weaknesses, and political economy challenges. Critical differentiators include governance quality, administrative capacity, technological infrastructure, resource availability, stakeholder participation levels, and policy implementation effectiveness. Despite contextual differences, successful development administration in both settings shares common elements, including political commitment, adaptive capacity, citizen engagement, evidence-based policymaking, and continuous learning mechanisms. The research identifies transferable lessons and contextual adaptation requirements for developing countries seeking to enhance their development administration systems.
Co-Authors Abdul Kosim, Abdul Abidin, Jaenal Altifianuri, Fazrilhiani Amir Mahmud Bijaksana, A. Muh. Arif Bijaksana Dewi, Mayang Santika Fatmawaty, A. St. Fatmawaty Fitri Amalia Hatidja, St. Hatidja Ilham Fahmi, Ilham Insani, Galang Habib Luciana Buarlele Mislia, Mislia Muli Umiaty Noer Nugraha, Rizki Nurul Nur, Rizki Amalia Nurmi Nonci Palangkey, Budi Setiawati Ulya, Neng Wahyudi Mokobombang Wulan, Wulan