Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Triana, Hetti Waluati

Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang

Author-ID : 683274

Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 16 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Title

1

Social practice on Facebook: Critical discourse analysis in the process of text production Hetti Waluati Triana; Eka Putra Wirman; Martin Kustati; Reflinaldi Reflinaldi; Awliya Rahmi; Nelmawarni Nelmawarni
Studies in English Language and Education Vol 7, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

The study aims to identify the ways to produce text production process by Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN, or State Islamic University) students in Padang on Facebook. Documentations, observations, and in depth-interviews were used to collect data. There were 1,214 discourses found on group and personal accounts of 27 informants, and 400 discourses were taken as data of the research. The analysis was conducted by following Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis, (CDA), with the Critical Linguistics approach. The research findings show that the text production process by UIN students on Facebook were done in three ways, namely producing their own text, spreading other people’s texts that are shared from the site, and producing text as a result of consumption of other texts. Producing text itself is a way of producing text by creating its own status as a form of expression of thoughts, feelings, and experiences, without referring to other texts or texts that have been published on other walls. The form of production by spreading text from other website is the most common form of text production. Production status is a form of the author’s reaction to the text he or she understood.

Social practice on Facebook: Critical discourse analysis in the process of text production Hetti Waluati Triana; Eka Putra Wirman; Martin Kustati; Reflinaldi Reflinaldi; Awliya Rahmi; Nelmawarni Nelmawarni
Studies in English Language and Education Vol 7, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/siele.v7i1.15170

The study aims to identify the ways to produce text production process by Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN, or State Islamic University) students in Padang on Facebook. Documentations, observations, and in depth-interviews were used to collect data. There were 1,214 discourses found on group and personal accounts of 27 informants, and 400 discourses were taken as data of the research. The analysis was conducted by following Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis, (CDA), with the Critical Linguistics approach. The research findings show that the text production process by UIN students on Facebook were done in three ways, namely producing their own text, spreading other people’s texts that are shared from the site, and producing text as a result of consumption of other texts. Producing text itself is a way of producing text by creating its own status as a form of expression of thoughts, feelings, and experiences, without referring to other texts or texts that have been published on other walls. The form of production by spreading text from other website is the most common form of text production. Production status is a form of the author’s reaction to the text he or she understood.

Lexical cohesion analysis on articles of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in Arabic and English online newspapers Syofyan Hadi; Hetti Waluati Triana; Tafiati Tafiati; Wartiman Wartiman; Reflinaldi Reflinaldi
Studies in English Language and Education Vol 11, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/siele.v11i1.30977

Discourse studies on the Russia-Ukraine conflict have been conducted in the past few years, especially in newspapers. Comparative studies on the media in several countries have been widely carried out; however, none so far focused on comparing Arabic and English newspapers. Thus, this article aimed to examine the lexical cohesion of Arabic and English newspapers to identify each newspaper’s tendency to represent the conflict. Aljazeera and The Guardian newspaper were designated as subjects of the study, in which five opinions published in March 2022 by each newspaper were purposively selected as data sources. Data was collected through internet archival documentation techniques and analysed by referring to the lexical cohesion theory framework proposed by Halliday and Matthiessen (2013). The results showed that repetition was the dominant cohesive device used in Aljazeera, whereas repetition and collocation were the most used lexical cohesion devices in The Guardian. The use of these lexical cohesion devices showed that Aljazeera took a neutral position in representing conflicts and actors. On the other hand, The Guardian tended to side with Ukraine while framing Russia and Putin negatively. Differences in these tendencies were due to the differences in interests. Aljazeera could stay impartial because Qatar had no political interests in the conflict. By contrast, The Guardian was positioning itself against Russia and Putin because Britain had economic and geopolitical interests in the conflict.

Title Search

Found 3 Documents Search Journal : Studies in English Language and Education

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Studies in English Language and Education