Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Golden Ratio of Data in Summary

High-Quality Leader-Member Exchange Relationships: A Pathway to Organizational Success Willie, Michael Mncedisi
Golden Ratio of Data in Summary Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): February - April
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grdis.v5i2.730

Abstract

Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory posits that the relationship quality between leaders and their subordinates significantly influences various aspects of the workplace, including employee satisfaction, retention, and overall performance. The primary purpose of this research is to analyse the effects of high-quality LMX relationships on job satisfaction, career development, and employee retention. Recognising the vital role of effective leadership in enhancing employee engagement and organisational performance motivates this study. As workplaces become increasingly complex, understanding LMX dynamics is crucial for developing strategies to improve satisfaction and retention. The study aims to fill gaps in existing literature to inform future research and practical applications. Employing a qualitative approach, this study conducts a comprehensive literature review of existing research on LMX theory. It synthesises theoretical models, empirical studies, and case analyses to robustly understand LMX relationships and their implications in diverse organisational contexts. The literature reveals that high-quality LMX relationships characterised by mutual trust, support, and respect significantly impact employee satisfaction and retention. Employees with solid leader relationships report higher job satisfaction and commitment, leading to improved performance and lower turnover rates. The findings underscore the need for leaders to enhance trust and support within their teams through recognition and career development opportunities. Organisations prioritising these elements will likely experience increased employee satisfaction and performance, fostering a positive workplace culture.
Ethical Issues and Implications of Citation Practices: A Case Study on Excessive Citations, Self-Citation and Co-Author Citations Willie, Michael Mncedisi
Golden Ratio of Data in Summary Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): August - October
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grdis.v5i4.579

Abstract

Citation practices are crucial for maintaining academic integrity, as they credit original ideas and integrate new research into the established knowledge framework. However, these practices can compromise scholarly work and misrepresent the impact of research when manipulated. This study investigates ethical concerns associated with excessive self-citation and co-author citations, examining their implications for academic integrity and citation metrics. Through a case study of a published paper—selected for its high frequency of co-author citations from accredited, peer-reviewed journals listed on Google Scholar—this research analyses citation patterns and their potential to inflate perceived scholarly impact. The findings reveal that excessive self-citation and repeated co-author citations can distort academic evaluations and create an imbalanced scholarly landscape. Supported by the literature, the study highlights the need for clear guidelines, transparency in citation practices, and vigilant monitoring by peer reviewers and editors. To preserve the integrity of academic research and ensure fair assessment, the paper recommends developing robust guidelines for citation practices and promoting transparency in citation choices.