Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.513
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Rechtsidee PATTIMURA Legal Journal Nanggroe: Journal Of Scholarly Service Nanggroe: Journal of Scholarly Service Open Access DRIVERset
Hetharia, Melkias
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : PATTIMURA Legal Journal

 1 
The Protection of Human Rights in Indonesia and Hungary: Comparative Legal Perspectives Hetharia, Melkias; Nikolet, Talabos Dávidné Lukács
PATTIMURA Legal Journal Vol 4 No 3 (2025): December 2025 PATTIMURA Legal Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate Program Doctoral in Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/pela.v4i3.25161

Abstract

Introduction: The protection of human rights (HAM) remains a fundamental challenge in contemporary international law, particularly in bridging the gap between international normative standards and their domestic implementation. Despite both Indonesia and Hungary having ratified core international human rights instruments including the ICCPR and ICESCR and enshrining human rights guarantees within their respective constitutions, significant disparities persist between formal legal commitments and the actual effectiveness of rights protection in practice. Purposes of the Research: This study aims to examine how the doctrines and principles of national law in Indonesia and Hungary construct human rights protection within the framework of harmonization with international legal norms, and to analyze the implications of their differing juridical approaches for the effectiveness of constitutional rights protection in law enforcement practice. Methods of the Research: This research employs a normative legal method with comparative and statute approaches. Results Main Findings of the Research: The findings reveal that Indonesia applies a selective incorporation model rooted in Pancasila, producing adaptive yet volatile protection contingent on political dynamics and institutional commitment, whereas Hungary formally adopts a structural integration model within the European supranational framework but has experienced systematic degradation of rights protection through abusive constitutionalism and democratic backsliding. Both cases demonstrate that the effectiveness of constitutional rights protection is not determined by the sophistication of the legal model chosen, but rather by the quality of the democratic ecosystem, the consistency of judicial interpretation, and sustained institutional commitment across all branches of state power. This study contributes a comparative normative framework that enriches human rights law literature with cross-regional analysis between Southeast Asia and Central Europe.
Co-Authors Angwarmasse, Lena Claudia Billy Kalangi, Billy Eddy - Pelupessy James Yoseph Palenewen Kadir Katjong Khairaz, Rifqon Mofu, Marselina Ivony Nikolet, Talabos Dávidné Lukács Nur Asmarani, Nur Nusawakan, Dwight Pelupessy, Berd Elkiopas Pelupessy, Sella Petrix Pondayar, Yustus Putu Endra Wijaya Negara Sahuleka, Onesimus Selviana, Evi Selviani, Evi Tanati, Daniel Tanggahma, Biloka Yoesry, Erni Yoesr Zulrijal Bushido Gani