Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.633
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ushuluddin Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Paedagoria : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu'ashirah: Media Kajian Al-Qur'an dan Al-Hadits Multi Perspektif Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, Adab dan Dakwah TAFSE: Journal of Qur'anic Studies QOF: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir An-Nur International Journal of Islamic Thought
Maram, Ahmad Nabilul
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 10 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : QOF: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir

 1 
Hasan al-Turabi’s Methodology in al-Tafsīr al-Tawḥīdī: A Contextual and Ideological Approach to Qur’anic Interpretation Safa, Abdillah; Maram, Ahmad Nabilul; Wara, Jullul; Ahmadi, Ahmadi
QOF Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Keiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/qof.v9i1.2731

Abstract

This study examines the exegetical methodology of Hasan al-Turabi in al-Tafsīr al-Tawḥīdī, a work distinguished by its tawḥīdī (unificationist) and ḥarakī (activist) framework. Using content analysis and ideological critique, this study dissects its epistemological foundations and interpretive strategies. The findings reveal several key characteristics. First, the concept of tawḥīd is not merely interpreted theologically but is operationalized as an epistemological principle and methodological foundation for a socio-political reform project. Second, his method selectively combines traditional sources (tafsīr bi al-riwāyah) with a dominant rational reasoning (tafsīr bi al-dirāyah), aligning with his ideological framework. Third, its structure employs a tahlīlī (analytical-sequential) method yet with a strong thematic touch through its tripartite systematics: a preface (khulāṣah hadī al-sūrah), a structural summary (tartīl al-ma‘ānī), and a detailed contemporary analysis (‘umūm al-ma‘ānī). Fourth, its interpretive flow is analytic-inductive, moving from a holistic overview of the sūrah to specific meanings, thereby building an action-oriented systemic paradigm. However, the analysis also reveals several fundamental weaknesses. A heavy reliance on ra'y, while sidelining the corpus of Hadith, creates space for the instrumentalization of the text for ideological purposes. Furthermore, his work is criticized for its limited methodological originality and inconsistent application of his method, suggesting a potential selective bias. This study offers a structured methodological assessment, sharply highlighting the dynamics and limitations of the tafsīr ḥarakī genre within contemporary Islamic discourse.
Co-Authors Abdul Fattah Ahmad Busyairi, Ahmad AHMADI Anam, A'azliansyah Farizil Assidiqi, Muhammad Raqib Fikri, Syarifuddin Ala Dzil Hidayat, Hakmi Hikami, Abdullah Faqih Imam Ghazali Said Nafiah, Zahrah Faizatun Qomariya, Nurul Rosi, Fauzi Fathur Safa, Abdillah Titik TriwulanTutik Wara, Jullul Zainal Fanani