Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.232
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA) Journal of Science Education Research Jurnal Pendidikan Jurnal Abdimasa Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal) Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education) JIPI (Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA) Equator Science Journal (ESJ) Samakta: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Febrian Andi Hidayat
Universitas Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Sorong
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Computer Science & IT Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia

 1 
PENGARUH PENDEKATAN INKUIRI TERBIMBING DIPADU DENGAN DIAGRAM ALIR TERHADAP TINGKAT PEMAHAMAN DAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI IPA SMA MUHAMMADIYAH JAYAPURA PADA MATERI LAJU REAKSI FEBRIAN ANDI HIDAYAT
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia Vol 5, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Program Magister Pendidikan IPA, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Cenderawasih

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (475.526 KB) | DOI: 10.31957/jipi.v5i1.235

Abstract

this study aims to determine the influence of guided inquiry approach combined with a flow diagram of the level of student understanding and of the student learning outcomes, and the improving student learning outcomes after learning use of guided inquiry approach combined with a flow chart. The results showed that : (1) a significant difference between guided inquiry approach combined with a flow diagram of the level of understanding of students with count of sig. 0,000 < 5 %, as well as the influence of 98.6%. (2) a significant difference between guided inquiry approach combined with a flowchart of the learning outcomes 1, 2, and 3 with sig. of count 0.000 < 5 % with the average percentage of the influence is 67.8 %. (3) an increase in the average learning outcomes of students from all three meetings, including in the medium category with a value of n-Gain an average of 0.616
Co-Authors A. Suhandi Abdul Rachman Tiro, Abdul Rachman Anakotta, Raisa Arum Anjarwati Atep Sujana Dewi Rachmatin Dian Septy Andhini Dwi Budi Santoso Edi Sutomo Fajar Efendi fathurrahman fathurrahman Fathurrahman Fathurrahman Fathurrahman Fathurrahman Fitriani, Anis Alfian HERNANI - Ihsan Ihsan Indri Anugrah Ramadhani Isnawati Isnawati Jaharudin, Jaharudin Kaniawati*, Ida Kasan, Asih La Musa Mangkasa, Nia Matius Rumbewas Muh Ishar Difinubun Muh. Rifa’i Nengsih Sri Wahyuni Nursalim Nursalim prasetyaningsih prasetyaningsih Raharja, Endra Putra Rahayu, Desti Ramadany, Lisa Dewi Robi Mambrasar Rustamadji Rustamadji Shohibul Ma'arif Sirojjuddin Sirojjuddin Siti Romlah Noer Hodijah Suhendar Sujana*, Atep Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Sutomo, Edi Triono, Mukhlas Trisna Amelia Wahyu Sopandi Wugaje, Annisa Luxfiati Yunus, Sitti Rahma Yusi Riksa Yustiana, Yusi Riksa