cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Arnis Duwita Purnama
Contact Email
jurnal@komisiyudisial.go.id
Phone
+628121368480
Journal Mail Official
jurnal@komisiyudisial.go.id
Editorial Address
Redaksi Jurnal Yudisial Gd. Komisi Yudisial RI Jl. Kramat Raya No. 57 Jakarta Pusat
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Yudisial
Published by Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia
ISSN : 19786506     EISSN : 25794868     DOI : 10.29123
Core Subject : Social,
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Jurnal Yudisial memuat hasil penelitian putusan hakim atas suatu kasus konkret yang memiliki aktualitas dan kompleksitas permasalahan hukum, baik dari pengadilan di Indonesia maupun luar negeri dan merupakan artikel asli (belum pernah dipublikasikan). Visi: Menjadikan Jurnal Yudisial sebagai jurnal berskala internasional. Misi: 1. Sebagai ruang kontribusi bagi komunitas hukum Indonesia dalam mendukung eksistensi peradilan yang akuntabel, jujur, dan adil. 2. Membantu tugas dan wewenang Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia dalam menjaga dan menegakkan kode etik dan pedoman perilaku hakim.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 1 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026)" : 1 Documents clear
DINAMIKA PENGGUNAAN AMBANG BATAS PRESIDEN DALAM SISTEMPRESIDENSIAL DI INDONESIA Hapsoro, Fakhris Lutfianto; Ismail
Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v19i1.742

Abstract

This study examines the regulatory framework and legal dynamics of the presidential threshold in Indonesian electoral law, focusing on Judgment Number 62/PUU-XXII/2024 of the Constitutional Court, which declared the presidential threshold provision unconstitutional. The Constitutional Court held that applying the presidential threshold exceeded the permissible limits of the open legal policy doctrine, especially regarding democratic morality, rationality, and justice. This research analyses the doctrinal evolution of the presidential threshold as reflected in the judgment and evaluates its implications for the presidential system. The study uses a normative juridical method, employing case, statutory, and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that, procedurally, the Constitutional Court expanded legal standing beyond citizens with the right to be elected to include those with the right to vote. Substantively, the Constitutional Court determined that the presidential threshold—previously classified as an open legal policy—violates the doctrine's internal limits. It is inconsistent with democratic morality, policy rationality, and the principle of justice, making it unconstitutional. The abolition of the presidential threshold has significant implications for the presidential system, especially in enhancing the inclusiveness of political rights and creating opportunities to strengthen the institutionalisation of political parties. However, it also raises challenges related to governmental consolidation and political stability. Therefore, strengthening the role and institutional capacity of political parties is essential to advancing a more representative, accountable, and sustainable democratic system.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 1

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 17 No. 3 (2024): DISPUTE OF RIGHT Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024): Child Protection Vol. 17 No. 1 (2024): ECOLOGICAL JUSTICE Vol. 16 No. 3 (2023): DISPARITAS PUTUSAN Vol. 16 No. 2 (2023): NOODWEER Vol. 16 No. 1 (2023): NIETIG Vol 15, No 3 (2022): BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD Vol. 15 No. 3 (2022): BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022): HUKUM PROGRESIF Vol 15, No 2 (2022): HUKUM PROGRESIF Vol 15, No 1 (2022): ARBITRIO IUDICIS Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022): ARBITRIO IUDICIS Vol 14, No 3 (2021): LOCUS STANDI Vol 14, No 2 (2021): SUMMUM IUS SUMMA INIURIA Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021): OPINIO JURIS SIVE NECESSITATIS Vol 14, No 1 (2021): OPINIO JURIS SIVE NECESSITATIS Vol. 13 No. 3 (2020): DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE Vol 13, No 3 (2020): DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020): VINCULUM JURIS Vol 13, No 2 (2020): VINCULUM JURIS Vol. 13 No. 1 (2020): REASON AND PASSION Vol 13, No 1 (2020): REASON AND PASSION Vol 12, No 3 (2019): LOCI IMPERIA Vol 12, No 2 (2019): ACTA NON VERBA Vol 12, No 1 (2019): POLITIK DAN HUKUM Vol 11, No 3 (2018): PARI PASSU Vol 11, No 2 (2018): IN CAUSA POSITUM Vol 11, No 1 (2018): IUS BONUMQUE Vol 10, No 3 (2017): ALIENI JURIS Vol 10, No 2 (2017): EX FIDA BONA Vol 10, No 1 (2017): ABROGATIO LEGIS Vol 9, No 3 (2016): [DE]KONSTRUKSI HUKUM Vol 9, No 2 (2016): DINAMIKA "CORPUS JURIS" Vol 9, No 1 (2016): DIVERGENSI TAFSIR Vol 8, No 3 (2015): IDEALITAS DAN REALITAS KEADILAN Vol 8, No 2 (2015): FLEKSIBILITAS DAN RIGIDITAS BERHUKUM Vol 8, No 1 (2015): DIALEKTIKA HUKUM NEGARA DAN AGAMA Vol 7, No 3 (2014): LIBERTAS, JUSTITIA, VERITAS Vol 7, No 2 (2014): DISPARITAS YUDISIAL Vol 7, No 1 (2014): CONFLICTUS LEGEM Vol 6, No 3 (2013): PERTARUNGAN ANTARA KUASA DAN TAFSIR Vol 6, No 2 (2013): HAK DALAM KEMELUT HUKUM Vol 6, No 1 (2013): MENAKAR RES JUDICATA Vol 5, No 3 (2012): MERENGKUH PENGAKUAN Vol 5, No 2 (2012): KUASA PARA PENGUASA Vol 5, No 1 (2012): MENGUJI TAFSIR KEADILAN Vol 4, No 3 (2011): SIMULACRA KEADILAN Vol 4, No 2 (2011): ANTINOMI PENEGAKAN HUKUM Vol 4, No 1 (2011): INDEPENDENSI DAN RASIONALITAS Vol 3, No 3 (2010): PERGULATAN NALAR DAN NURANI Vol 3, No 2 (2010): KOMPLEKSITAS PUNITAS Vol 3, No 1 (2010): KORUPSI DAN LEGISLASI More Issue