cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Riza Faishol
Contact Email
riezha09@gmail.com
Phone
+6281358900484
Journal Mail Official
arrisalahiaiigenteng@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. KH. Hasyim Asy’ari No. 1 Genteng Banyuwangi 68465 Telp. (0333) 845654
Location
Kab. banyuwangi,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmiah Ar-Risalah: Media Ke-Islaman, Pendidikan, dan Hukum Islam
Published by Institut Agama Islam IBRAHIMY GENTENG BANYUWANGI
ISSN : 16930576     EISSN : 25407783     DOI : https://doi.org/10.29062/arrisalah.v18i1
Core Subject : Religion, Economy, Humanities, Education, Social,
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences
Ar-Risalah: Media Keislaman, Pendidikan dan Hukum Islam is a Islamic journal that focuses on critical studies of Islamic studies, education, and Islamic law. Ar-Risalah published by Institut Agama Islam Ibrahimy Genteng Banyuwangi. Publishing two times a year: issues 1 on april and issue 2 on october. Ar-Risalah have a registration number print ISSN 1693-0576 and online ISSN 2540-7783 published by the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI). Ar-Risalah: Media Keislaman, Pendidikan dan Hukum Islam is a Islamic journal that focuses on critical studies of Islamic studies, education, and Islamic law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 20 No 2 (2022): (Oktober 2022)" : 12 Documents clear
IMPLEMENTASI METODE PROBLEM SOLVING DALAM PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM PADA KELAS X AKUNTANSI 2 DI SMK NURUT TAQWA SONGGON Muttaqin, Ahmad Izza; Fauzi, Anis; Fajar, Muhamad Isfan
Ar-Risalah Media Keislaman Pendidikan dan Hukum Islam Vol 20 No 2 (2022): (Oktober 2022)
Publisher : LPPM IAI IBRAHIMY GENTENG BANYUWANGI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69552/ar-risalah.v20i2.1589

Abstract

This study aims to explain the Implementation ofMethods Problem Solving in Islamic Religious Education Learning in Class X Accounting 2 at SMK Nurut Taqwa Songgon Academic Year 2020/2021, explaining the supporting factors and inhibiting factors in the use of themethod ProblemSolving at SMK Nurut Taqwa Songgon. The type of research used in this research is descriptive qualitative. Methods of collecting data using non-participant observation methods, semi-structured interviews, and documentation. The research subjects or respondents in the study were the principal, Islamic religious education teacher, students of class X Accounting 2. The validity of the data was carried out by triangulation. And data analysis includes data collection, data reduction, and data presentation. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that the implementation ofmethods problem solving in learning Islamic religious education at SMK Nurut Taqwa Songgon uses three components in the learning process, namely, planning, implementation, evaluation. In planning, educators have prepared learning tools such as syllabus and lesson plans. For the implementation process, educators have carried out in accordance with the steps of themethod problem solving. And for evaluation, the teacher evaluates by means of a written test or test and the teacher sees the activeness and hard work of the students. Supporting factors are support from students, parents and teachers, adequate media, systematic student mindset, not being creative in learning, and especially with professional teachers. There are quite a lot of time inhibiting factors, requiring regular and careful planning, and the lack of motivation of students to study Islamic religious education. Because most students are only interested in learning general science. And also some students who are busy themselves, because some students are not happy with the way a teacher delivers so that it makes noise in the class and disturbs their friends. Lack of confidence and some are still shy in expressing their opinion.
KOMPARASI PENGGUNAAN METODE THE POWER OF TWO DAN TALKING STICK TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN AL-QUR’AN HADIS Zain, Faza Faizatuz; Mashuri, Imam; Erlangga, Moh.
Ar-Risalah Media Keislaman Pendidikan dan Hukum Islam Vol 20 No 2 (2022): (Oktober 2022)
Publisher : LPPM IAI IBRAHIMY GENTENG BANYUWANGI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69552/ar-risalah.v20i2.1521

Abstract

In this study, the researcher describes a comparison or comparison between the learning of class VII students who have been involved in two different learning methods, namely The Power of Two and Talking Stick at MTs Negeri 5 Banyuwangi, which is located in Cluring District. Then to find out which one is superior between student learning outcomes and learning using The Power of Two and Talking Stick methods. This research is a descriptive quantitative research. With a population of class VII students totaling 143 students. Meanwhile, the sample in this study was 42 children who were members of class VII A and VII B. The main data in this study were obtained based on the test instrument given by the researcher to the sample students. In addition, researchers also used other research instruments in the form of interviews and observations as additional data. Data on student learning outcomes obtained from tests conducted by researchers were then tested for validity (validity) and reliability (reliability) to determine whether the data obtained by researchers could be further analyzed. Once declared valid and reliable. Homogeneity and normality tests were conducted to determine whether the data experienced a normal distribution and had the same or homogeneous data variance. Furthermore, to find out the comparison between student learning outcomes between the application of The Power of Two method with Talking Stick, a hypothesis test was carried out in the form of a t-test (t-test). The results of this study indicate that there is an influence between the methods on the paired sample t-test which shows the t-value of the two methods on learning outcomes which is higher than the t-table value. The results of the t-test indicate that the t-count value of student learning outcomes after learning with The Power of Two method is -5.405 while for post-learning student learning outcomes using the Talking Stick method is -9.477, then from this study it can also be concluded that the score student learning outcomes influenced by the Talking Stick method were higher than student learning outcomes influenced by The Power of Two method (-9.477>-5.405). Thus it is concluded that in this study the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted while the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected. Keywords: Comparison, The Power of Two, Talking Stick, Method, Learning Outcomes

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2022 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 23 No 1 (2025): (April 2025) Vol 22 No 2 (2024): (October 2024) Vol 22 No 1 (2024): (April 2024) Vol 21 No 2 (2023): (Oktober 2023) Vol 21 No 1 (2023): (April 2023) Vol 20 No 2 (2022): (Oktober 2022) Vol 20 No 1 (2022): (April 2022) Vol 19 No 2 (2021): (Oktober 2021) Vol 19 No 1 (2021): (April 2021) Vol 18 No 2 (2020): (Oktober 2020) Vol 18 No 1 (2020): (April 2020) Vol 17 No 2 (2019): (Oktober 2019) Vol 17 No 1 (2019): (April 2019) Vol 16 No 2 (2018): (Oktober 2018) Vol 16 No 1 (2018): (April 2018) Vol 15 No 2 (2017): (Oktober 2017) Vol 15 No 1 (2017): (APRIL 2017) Vol 14 No 2 (2016): (OKTOBER 2016) Vol 14 No 1 (2016): (APRIL 2016) Vol 13 No 2 (2015): (OKTOBER 2015) Vol 13 No 1 (2015): (APRIL 2015) Vol 12 No 2 (2014): (Oktober 2014) Vol 12 No 1 (2014): (April 2014) Vol 11 No 2 (2013): (OKTOBER 2013) Vol 11 No 1 (2013): (APRIL 2013) More Issue