cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Miftah Farid
Contact Email
Miftah.farid@uin-alauddin.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
Hub.intl@uin-alauddin.ac.id
Editorial Address
Departement of International Relation Ushuluddin and Philosophy Alauddin State Islamic University of Makassar. H.M.Yasin Limpo, Samata, Gowa.
Location
Kab. gowa,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional)
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
ISSN : 26855879     EISSN : 2685421X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Environmental Science Social Sciences
Journal Review of International Relations (RIR) is an academic journal which is published by International Relations Department of UIN Alauddin Makassar and wiil be distributed twice a year every June and December. This Journal discuss about theories and researches in International Relations studies. The scripts that could be submitted by academicians and practitioners in these areas : Islamic Studies, Regional Studies, Globalization and Development, State-Security Studies, and Transnational Issues.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Politik dan Hubungan Internasional
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional)" : 6 Documents clear
Religion (Islam) and International Relations: A Perspective Sahrasad, Herdi
Review of International Relations Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional)
Publisher : UIN ALAUDDIN MAKASSAR

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/rir.v5i2.39707

Abstract

This article argues that religion (Islam) and international relations in the era of post-war globalization, have its own relevance and contextuality. So far, the international relations in the post-Cold War was marked by the rise of actors and issues. In the realm of actors, emerging non-state actors who perform various international relations practices both leading to cooperation and peace as well as toward conflict and conflict. The state is no longer a dominant actor although it remains the primary actor. In the realm of the issue, the concern of mankind is no longer focused on high politics in the form of matters of national security and military alone, but the issues that were originally included in the category of low politics were even more prominent. As an impact, disruption to international security and order is not a monopoly of the issue of national security. Non-traditional security threats such as environmental issues, the spread of disease, transnational crime and others, also threaten global peace. Conflicts of communal identity that are usually based on religion, ethnicity, race, clan, tribe, or other identity become one of the leading ones. And in such international situation, Islam is challenged to respond the complexities of today's international problems.
Gain Power Through No Power: Effectiveness of China's Roles in Conflict Resolution between Saudi Arabia and Iran Long-Standing Dispute Aula Wiji Kinasih, Raden Safinatul; Surwandono
Review of International Relations Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional)
Publisher : UIN ALAUDDIN MAKASSAR

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/rir.v5i2.40445

Abstract

This research will discuss about the role of China as a conflict resolver between Saudi Arabia and Iran that just happened in March 2023. The two Gulf states decided to work toward settling their differences in accordance with a set of international principles and two bilateral agreements reached in 1998 and 2001 after seven years of military and diplomatic animosity. A deal to restore diplomatic ties between Riyadh and Tehran was announced in a joint statement by Saudi Arabia, Iran, and China on March 10 and Beijing become the place these intense negotiations take place. This shows how big China roles and influence in the middle east, thus bringing the researcher to a question what strategy they used. This research uses qualitative research method by collecting data from former journal and research. This research found that China goal behind taking the role is to strengthen their stances through soft balancing strategy. Thus, this research will explain more about the strategy and the use of China diplomacy approach that compliment it, making it possible for China to gain power without exerting one at all.
Global Justice’s Critics of Green Politics Theory Towards International Rules of Climate Change Tri Utami, Arum
Review of International Relations Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional)
Publisher : UIN ALAUDDIN MAKASSAR

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/rir.v5i2.40851

Abstract

Environmental issues have become a concern issues in the last decades. Green Politics emerge as an enforcement from the global community because of the climate change problem in the world. Green Politics emphasized on the decentralization of power to solved the environmental issues. The role of individual become important in solving environmental issues. If each individual has the similar awareness,it could be solved the environmental issues. Global Justice come up and claimed as a solution to see the environmental problems. According to global justice, the equal right in opportunities is the key of handling the climate change. States is an actor that can facilitated the movement of climate change. The perception of global justice perceive if individual is the main actor in environmental issues, it would not be unfair to individual in the developing countries. Distributive of justice is needed to make developing countries have a similar opportunities to reach a similar improvement liked developed countries.
Sistem Ekonomi Politik Kapital sebagai Isu Hubungan Internasional: Perbandingan Dampak Sistem Kapital terhadap Kesejahteraan Sosial Menurut Perspektif Konvensional dan Islam Putri, Mia Utami; Nur Azizah, Meiliani; Regita Cahyani Muis, Afni
Review of International Relations Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional)
Publisher : UIN ALAUDDIN MAKASSAR

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/rir.v5i2.41335

Abstract

The Capitalist Economic System prioritizes individual freedom by maintaining market mechanisms to improve their economy, and trying to obtain maximum profits. On the other hand, there is an Islamic political economy which has a sharia basis by strengthening the role of 'Ukhuwah Islamiyah' so that social inequality does not occur between communities. This research will discuss the differences in the impact of the capitalist economic system from the perspective of Islamic and conventional political economy on the welfare of society. This research uses a qualitative-descriptive method by making literature reviews as the unit to search the main datas. The research findings in this research are that there are significant differences between the capitalist system based on an Islamic perspective and conventional ones based on fundamental values, principles and ultimate goals.
Existence and Dynamics of The Islamic-Malay Sultanate Across The Malacca Strait: A Multifaceted Exploration Of Non-Western Ir Theories Setiawan, Azhari
Review of International Relations Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional)
Publisher : UIN ALAUDDIN MAKASSAR

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/rir.v5i2.42854

Abstract

The historical interactions among the Malay sultanates/kingdoms across the Malacca Strait offer a fascinating glimpse into the world of international relations beyond the Western lens. Based on the desire to build a non-Western IR theory, this study has highlighted the rich tapestry of cultural diversity, postcolonial struggles, local agency, alternative ideas, and hybridity that characterized the diplomatic landscape of these kingdoms. The struggle for power, strategic cooperation, and regionalism among the Malay kingdoms were deeply rooted in their cultural heritage, challenging the conventional narratives, and showcasing the resilience and adaptability of non-Western societies in shaping their international relations. As we reflect on these historical dynamics, it becomes evident that the lessons from the past continue to resonate in the contemporary global landscape, emphasizing the importance of embracing diverse perspectives and recognizing the agency of all nations in shaping the course of international relations. This study delves into the intricate historical interactions among the Islamic-Malay kingdoms in the Malacca Strait region. Employing a diverse array of non-Western International Relations (IR) theories, the research sheds light on the multifaceted dimensions of the diplomatic landscape in pre-modern Southeast Asia. Through an extensive library research approach, which involved the analysis of classic manuscripts and texts relevant to the topic, this study unveils the nuanced power struggles, strategic alliances, and regional cooperation mechanisms that shaped the Malay kingdoms' international relations. By delving into these historical records, the research provides a comprehensive understanding of how cultural context, postcolonial perspectives, local agency, alternative ideas, and hybridity influenced the diplomatic maneuvers of the Malay kingdoms, challenging conventional Western-centric narratives and showcasing the richness of non-Western IR theories.
Perbandingan Media Internasional: CNN dan Al-Jazeera Terkait Serangan Udara Pasukan Hamas ke Israel Rinaldy, Asfar
Review of International Relations Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional)
Publisher : UIN ALAUDDIN MAKASSAR

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/rir.v5i2.43277

Abstract

This research focuses on how or how international online media present news about "Hamas Air Strikes on Israel" on topics focused on two international media namely CNN and Al Jazeera by looking at the comparison between the two media related to existing events. Using the research method Framing Analysis model Robert N. Entman. The practice of framing in the context of the media involves the selection of certain issues, neglect of other issues, and the prominence of certain aspects of the issue through various striking placement discourse strategies and is one of the alternative theories to obtain an overview of the content of the message conveyed and know how the media constructing reality. Framing analysis is more qualitative. With data collection techniques used are primary sources, and secondary sources. As for the results of this study, the authors found that CNN represents Israel positively and Hamas negatively. On the other hand, Al Jazeera represents Hamas positively and Israel negatively. In the news discourse presented by Al Jazeera media, there are also often nuances more towards support for Hamas, with many sources and participants involved from their faction. In the news discourse presented by CNN media, there are often anti-Hamas nuances where the sources and participants involved, namely most of the Israelis.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Review of International Relations Vol 6 No 2 (2024): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional) Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional) Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional) Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional) Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional) Vol 4 No 1 (2022): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional) Vol 3 No 2 (2021): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional) Vol 3 No 1 (2021): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional) Vol 2 No 2 (2020): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional) Vol 2 No 1 (2020): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional) Vol 1 No 2 (2019): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional) Vol 1 No 1 (2019): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional) More Issue