cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Floribertus Herichis Wanto Tapo
Contact Email
jurnalledalero@gmail.com
Phone
+6281239632643
Journal Mail Official
jurnalledalero@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Ledalero 861542, Maumere, Flores, NTT, Indonesia
Location
Kab. flores timur,
Nusa tenggara timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ledalero
Published by Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero
ISSN : 14125420     EISSN : 25034316     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy, Humanities, Science, Education, Art, Social,
Arts Humanities Astronomy Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
In accord with the motto of IFTK Ledalero, the institute that publishes this journal, “Diligite Lumen Sapientiae” (“Love Light & Truth”), Jurnal Ledalero: Wacana Iman dan Kebudayaan (Discourse on Faith and Culture) is dedicated to publishing quality articles intended to assis its readers to love light and truth. Via the published articles, this journal endeavours to enlighten, to sharpen the minds, and to broaden the way of thinking of its readers. Jurnal Ledalero: Wacana Iman dan Kebudayaan (Discourse on Faith and Culture) encourages researchers, academics, professionals, practitioners, and students to submit articles which ae the fruit of their research and critical analysis in the fields of philosophy, theology, and the social sciences, such as cultural studies, sociology, politics, psychology, language, anthropology and art.
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Filsafat
Articles 14 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2023" : 14 Documents clear
Relasi Uang dan Kekuasaan dalam Konteks Pertukaran Sosial dan Dominasi Impersonal Eka S Saputra; Herdito Sandi Pratama
JURNAL LEDALERO Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2023
Publisher : Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31385/jl.v22i2.373.165-185

Abstract

Abstract: This article discusses social exchange in the relationship between money and power, where money as an economic medium can direct power politically. The framework of thought used refers to Karl Marx. However, this research puts forward a method of critical thinking analysis, with a new approach to reading Marx as pioneered by the Frankfurt School. The steps taken include investigation, interpretation, and deliberation within the framework of a qualitative study. As a result, it appears that there is a development of Marx's theory of value from originally related to concrete work to be intertwined with abstract work through the mediation of money. This research also finds that the tangled threads of social exchange in relation to money and power are formed through fetishism. The worship of money as an independent value binds the existence of value to the form of money. This then manifests impersonal domination. Prioritization of money occurs at the expense or neglect of social relationships and human values. To overcome this tangle, it is necessary to reject the logic of capital, which makes everything rely on money.Fundamentally, this rejection refers to universal, particular, and singular frames in Žižek's review. Within this framework, the rejection of singular, specific individuals or groups, particularly operative organizational programs, and protest movements with broad universal alliances must work together to drive change.Keywords: Money, Power, Karl Marx, Social Exchange, Fetishism.
Sistematika dan Pemetaan Konsep Ketuhanan Agama-Agama Lokal di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Agama Sunda Wiwitan, Agama Kaharingan, dan Agama Towani Tolotang Agus Himmawan Utomo; Galuh Nur Fattah
JURNAL LEDALERO Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2023
Publisher : Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31385/jl.v22i2.340.143-164

Abstract

Abstract: Indonesia has an invaluable cultural heritage, one of which is the existence of various indigenous religions that are widespread throughout the country. Despite their significant number, their presence is oftendisregarded by the majority of society who have adopted formal religions that are recognized by the state. Followers of indigenous religions are often deemed misguided by formal religion practitioners because theyperceive these ancestral religions as worshiping entities other than God, as recognized by their own religious tradition. This is exacerbated by the government's attempt to integrate indigenous religions into one of therecognized formal religions, which poses a threat to the preservation of the teachings and religious practices of indigenous religion followers as their religious practices will inevitably be influenced by the standardizations of the formal religions, which are essentially religions of foreign origin. All forms of discrimination arise, among others, from the weakness or inability of indigenous religion followers to explain their theological systems and concepts of divinity. Therefore, this study attempts to explain the concept of divinity in indigenous religions by using three casestudies: Sunda Wiwitan, Kaharingan, and Towani Tolotang. The results of this study show that there are authentic characteristics of divinity in each of the studied indigenous religion systems, which are specifically categorized as henotheism and Animism-Dynamism.Keyword: Indigenious Religions, Concept of Divinity, Henotheism, Animism-Dynamism
Menilik Pembatasan Kebebasan Beragama dan Berkeyakinan dalam Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia Fransiska Widyawati
JURNAL LEDALERO Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2023
Publisher : Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31385/jl.v22i2.378.186-199

Abstract

Abstract: The right to marry and the right to practice a religion are fundamental human rights that are not mutually exclusive. The fulfilment of one does not necessitate the compromise of the other. However, in Indonesia, many couples from diverse religious backgrounds face complexities in exercising these rights due to the constraintsimposed by Marriage Law Number 1 of 1974, which does not explicitly accommodate interfaith marriages. According to this law, the legal recognition of a marriage necessitates a religious ceremony, and religious institutions often resist interfaith marriages. They typically urge couples from different religions to adopt a common faith to facilitate their acceptance into matrimony. This requirement often compels individuals to convert to their partner’s religion, thereby challenging their freedom of religion and belief. In the pursuit of a legally recognized marriage, individuals may find themselves coerced into relinquishing their religious freedom. This article examines the challenges faced in actualizing human rights and religious freedom in Indonesia within the context of interfaithmarriages. The methodology employed is Critical Discourses Analysis (CDA), a critical study based on text (in this case, Marriage Law No. 1/194) and context (random examples). Through critical analysis, this article posits that government regulations requiring legal recognition of marriages by religious institutions serve as an impediment to the fulfilment of religious rights and beliefs for citizens engaged in interfaith relationships. Consequently, this article advocates for amendments to the marriage regulations to actualize the human rights of freedom of religionand belief.Key words: Marriage, Human Rights, Indonesia, Marriage Law, Inter-religious Marriage
Tractatus Politicus dan Demokrasi: Risalah Model-model Rezim yang Rasional Norbertus Jegalus; Yohanes Subani
JURNAL LEDALERO Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2023
Publisher : Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31385/jl.v22i2.379.102-119

Abstract

Abstract: Tractatus Politicus is a work of Spinoza's political philosophy which discusses regime models arranged in stages according to the level of use of reason: Monarchy is rational, aristocracy is more rational, and democracy is most rational. Spinoza, who is known as the prophet of reason, established rationality as a normative standard forthe three types of regimes. The rationality of a regime is measured by the size of the council which is tasked with discussing and controlling all state policies and Spinoza considers democracy to be the most rational because democracy allows for a people's council that is bigger than monarchy and aristocracy. Supomo adopted Spinoza's views as one of the philosophical sources for his state theory known as the "Staatsidee Integralistik". Interestingly, Spinoza saw democracy as the best model of government, while Supomo, who referred to Spinoza, actually rejected democracy. Simanjuntak then conducted a critical study of the philosophical source of the controversial “Staatsidee Integralistik”. However, Simanjuntak's study became more controversial, because he found that not only Supomo rejected democracy but also Spinoza. This study aims to respond to all these controversies and finds that while it is true that Supomo rejects democracy, it is not true that Spinoza rejects democracy. Spinoza was a staunch rationalist who supported democracy.Key words: Politics, democracy, theocracy, organistic state, integralistic state.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 14

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 24, No 1 (2025): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Juni 2025 Vol 23, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2024 Vol 23, No 1 (2024): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Juni 2024 Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2023 Vol 22, No 1 (2023): JURNAL LEDALERO EDISI JUNI 2023 Vol 21, No 2 (2022): Jurnal Ledalero Vol 21, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Ledalero Vol 20, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2021 Vol 20, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Juni 2021 Vol 19, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Ledalero Vol 19, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Ledalero Vol 18, No 2 (2019): Jurnal Ledalero Vol 18, No 1 (2019) Vol 17, No 2 (2018) Vol 17, No 1 (2018): RADIKALISME Vol 16, No 2 (2017): SAMPAH Vol 16, No 1 (2017): Seratus Tahun Sesudah Perang Dunia Pertama Vol 15, No 2 (2016): Lima Ratus Tahun Reformasi Protestan Vol 15, No 1 (2016): Korupsi Vol 14, No 2 (2015): HIV : Pesawat Tempur Siluman NTT Vol 14, No 1 (2015): Tolak Tipu, Lawan Lupa Vol 13, No 2 (2014): Gerakan Sosial untuk Perubahan Sosial Vol 13, No 1 (2014): MANUSIA MEMPERDAGANGKAN MANUSIA Vol 12, No 1 (2013): Tanggal Hujat , Tempuh Dialog : 50 Tahun Konsili Vatikan II Vol 12, No 2 (2013): AGAMA DAN NEGARA Vol 10, No 2 (2011): RELIGIOSITAS POPULER More Issue