Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM)
Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) welcomes any articles from various disciplines, such as Public Policy, Urban Planning and Design, Environment and Sustainable Development, Economics and Fiscal Policy, Creative Financing, Taxation and Finance, Law, Engineering, Sociology, and other fields related to infrastructure policy and management. The topics may include but not limited to: Public-Private Partnership for infrastructure development Economic and financial aspects, including creative financing schemes and asset management (funding and investment, taxation, life-cycle cost, risk mitigation and management, cost and budgeting, public private partnership, innovative financing, data management and technology integration, capacity building) Infrastructure policy (governance and public policy innovation, bureaucratic reform, and institutional arrangements) Urban and rural planning (land use, zoning regulation, housing, smart/healthy cities, heritage preservation, ICT for spatial planning and management) Sustainability and waste management (environment, energy, climate change, resource use and efficiency, smart and green technology, city resilience) Law and regulations (contractual agreements, safety regulations, data privacy, cyber security, land use, and zoning regulations) Engineering (design and technical specifications, quality control and assurance, geotechnical issues, material selection and durability, innovative technology, architecture, smart architecture) Community development and social engineering (infrastructure development and social inclusion, community resettlement, community resilience and participation, social justice) Transportation issues (road, railway, seaport, airport) Digital application for infrastructure innovation (artificial intelligence, machine learning, etc.)
Articles
10 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM)"
:
10 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Analisis Dampak Ekonomi dan Sosial Pembangunan Infrastruktur di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Prita Amalia]]>;
<![CDATA[Yogi Suprayogi]]>;
<![CDATA[Yudi Azis]]>;
<![CDATA[Wawan Hermawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Eksa Pamungkas]]>;
<![CDATA[Adi Nurzaman]]>;
<![CDATA[Anhar Fauzan Priyono]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Infrastructure projects are expected to deliver positive economic and social impact to the community. However, the model to analyze the economic and social impact is still limited. Therefore, this study aims to develop an economic and social impact model to be used for study the impact of infrastructure projects. The research focuses on several case studies of infrastructure projects which guaranteed by Indonesia Infrastructure Guarantee Fund (IIGF) both PPP (Public-Private-Partnership) Scheme and non-PPP Scheme on telco, water, tourism Sector. These sectors are believed to represented the major infrastructure development that cover both local, national, and international perspectives. The analytical method used to measure economic impacts from infrastructure development is a quantitative approach by using following attributes: Sectoral Economic Analysis, Potential Economic Analysis, Growth Accounting, Input-Output Table Analysis, and Statistical Forecasting. While, to analyse the social impact of infrastructure development, quantitative and qualitative approaches are used by In-depth Interview through questionnaire filling technique and Social Impact Assessment (SIA) method. In addition, this study also used legal approach method. The results show various economic impacts of project investment development, both in terms of potential and realization. Meanwhile, in terms of social impacts, there are various community responses to the realization of project development.]]>
<![CDATA[Culture-Sensitive Public Procurement Benchmarking ]]>
<![CDATA[Brian F. Fabrègue]]>;
<![CDATA[Léo J. Portal]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[In this brief we will address the measure of managing public procurement taking into consideration cultural, corporate and organizational specificities, with a sustainable development strategy in mind. When such tools are used in conjunction, the efficiency of production applications is increased. Further research should focus on the investigation of foreign markets for industrial and state businesses’ public procurement, including private law state-owned companies, as well as on developing a mechanism to evaluate public procurement that takes economic, social, and environmental factors into account. Finally, we need to be aware that integrating cultural factors when dealing with public procurement is fundamental when it comes to leadership issues. Underpinning leadership is an ability to comprehend people, their values, and characteristics, and how these factors may correct and adapt public procurement methodology.]]>
<![CDATA[Alternative Approach to Sustainable Urban Mobility in Developing Countries ]]>
<![CDATA[Dimas Nu’man Fadhil]]>;
<![CDATA[Arimbi Jinca]]>;
<![CDATA[Puguh Prakoso]]>;
<![CDATA[Julianto Hoegeng]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Cities in developing countries are facing intertwined urban mobility challenges: urban sprawl and traffic jam. Having not enough reliable and standardized public transport supply means the residents are forced to opt for traveling by private vehicles such as cars or motorcycles. There is a swell of tailpipe emission and economic losses due to traffic jam. Overcoming urban sprawl and at the same time building massive public transport is not an easy feat to accomplish, as both require immense investments and years of construction. Therefore, cities must have innovative plans to increase public-transport coverage and articulate density through paratransit formalization & digitalization, demand management, and land consolidation.]]>
<![CDATA[Improving Governance in Major Infrastructure Projects ]]>
<![CDATA[Phalguni Sundaram Biswal]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[From an economic growth perspective, infrastructure is not only an enabling factor for development or for facilitating private investments and competitiveness across all sectors of national and regional economies, but can also be an attractive investment opportunity in itself. Although infrastructure investment opportunities are plentiful across developing countries, investors are not fully seizing them, often due to gaps in the enabling environment for such investment. The infrastructure sector presents specific risks to private investors, and since private participation in infrastructure delivery is a relatively recent form of procurement in many countries, governments do not necessarily have the experience and capacity needed to effectively manage these risks. Beyond case-by-case project preparation and financing, concrete, implementation-oriented guidance that can help governments identify and manage reforms is needed to make the broader infrastructure investment environment more open to private participation.]]>
<![CDATA[Identifying Tensions in Infrastructure Development using Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Mechanism ]]>
<![CDATA[Suryani Eka Wijaya]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This research aims to identify tensions in infrastructure development using public-private partnership (PPP) mechanism. The tensions in infrastructure development are identified using a qualitative research methodology, in particular a questionnaire survey to fathom the perceived risks by associated actors and institutions, economic and financial condition, procurement processes, and the relationship between the public and private sectors. This study highlights the role of intermediate agency connecting the role of the government and the private sector. By identifying the potential and the capacity of intermediate agency to connect infrastructure development across different development agenda, the local government should be able to improve the mechanism for PPP infrastructure development scheme.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Dampak Ekonomi dan Sosial Pembangunan Infrastruktur di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Prita Amalia]]>;
<![CDATA[Yogi Suprayogi]]>;
<![CDATA[Yudi Azis]]>;
<![CDATA[Wawan Hermawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Eksa Pamungkas]]>;
<![CDATA[Adi Nurzaman]]>;
<![CDATA[Anhar Fauzan Priyono]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.401.0015
<![CDATA[Infrastructure projects are expected to deliver positive economic and social impact to the community. However, the model to analyze the economic and social impact is still limited. Therefore, this study aims to develop an economic and social impact model to be used for study the impact of infrastructure projects. The research focuses on several case studies of infrastructure projects which guaranteed by Indonesia Infrastructure Guarantee Fund (IIGF) both PPP (Public-Private-Partnership) Scheme and non-PPP Scheme on telco, water, tourism Sector. These sectors are believed to represented the major infrastructure development that cover both local, national, and international perspectives. The analytical method used to measure economic impacts from infrastructure development is a quantitative approach by using following attributes: Sectoral Economic Analysis, Potential Economic Analysis, Growth Accounting, Input-Output Table Analysis, and Statistical Forecasting. While, to analyse the social impact of infrastructure development, quantitative and qualitative approaches are used by In-depth Interview through questionnaire filling technique and Social Impact Assessment (SIA) method. In addition, this study also used legal approach method. The results show various economic impacts of project investment development, both in terms of potential and realization. Meanwhile, in terms of social impacts, there are various community responses to the realization of project development.]]>
<![CDATA[Culture-Sensitive Public Procurement Benchmarking ]]>
<![CDATA[Brian F. Fabrègue]]>;
<![CDATA[Léo J. Portal]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.401.0016
<![CDATA[In this brief we will address the measure of managing public procurement taking into consideration cultural, corporate and organizational specificities, with a sustainable development strategy in mind. When such tools are used in conjunction, the efficiency of production applications is increased. Further research should focus on the investigation of foreign markets for industrial and state businesses’ public procurement, including private law state-owned companies, as well as on developing a mechanism to evaluate public procurement that takes economic, social, and environmental factors into account. Finally, we need to be aware that integrating cultural factors when dealing with public procurement is fundamental when it comes to leadership issues. Underpinning leadership is an ability to comprehend people, their values, and characteristics, and how these factors may correct and adapt public procurement methodology.]]>
<![CDATA[Alternative Approach to Sustainable Urban Mobility in Developing Countries ]]>
<![CDATA[Dimas Nu’man Fadhil]]>;
<![CDATA[Arimbi Jinca]]>;
<![CDATA[Puguh Prakoso]]>;
<![CDATA[Julianto Hoegeng]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.401.0017
<![CDATA[Cities in developing countries are facing intertwined urban mobility challenges: urban sprawl and traffic jam. Having not enough reliable and standardized public transport supply means the residents are forced to opt for traveling by private vehicles such as cars or motorcycles. There is a swell of tailpipe emission and economic losses due to traffic jam. Overcoming urban sprawl and at the same time building massive public transport is not an easy feat to accomplish, as both require immense investments and years of construction. Therefore, cities must have innovative plans to increase public-transport coverage and articulate density through paratransit formalization & digitalization, demand management, and land consolidation.]]>
<![CDATA[Improving Governance in Major Infrastructure Projects ]]>
<![CDATA[Phalguni Sundaram Biswal]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.401.0018
<![CDATA[From an economic growth perspective, infrastructure is not only an enabling factor for development or for facilitating private investments and competitiveness across all sectors of national and regional economies, but can also be an attractive investment opportunity in itself. Although infrastructure investment opportunities are plentiful across developing countries, investors are not fully seizing them, often due to gaps in the enabling environment for such investment. The infrastructure sector presents specific risks to private investors, and since private participation in infrastructure delivery is a relatively recent form of procurement in many countries, governments do not necessarily have the experience and capacity needed to effectively manage these risks. Beyond case-by-case project preparation and financing, concrete, implementation-oriented guidance that can help governments identify and manage reforms is needed to make the broader infrastructure investment environment more open to private participation.]]>
<![CDATA[Identifying Tensions in Infrastructure Development using Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Mechanism ]]>
<![CDATA[Suryani Eka Wijaya]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.401.0019
<![CDATA[This research aims to identify tensions in infrastructure development using public-private partnership (PPP) mechanism. The tensions in infrastructure development are identified using a qualitative research methodology, in particular a questionnaire survey to fathom the perceived risks by associated actors and institutions, economic and financial condition, procurement processes, and the relationship between the public and private sectors. This study highlights the role of intermediate agency connecting the role of the government and the private sector. By identifying the potential and the capacity of intermediate agency to connect infrastructure development across different development agenda, the local government should be able to improve the mechanism for PPP infrastructure development scheme.]]>
