cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Realism
Contact Email
realismlawreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285726365956
Journal Mail Official
realismlawreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Villa Jasmine 1 Blok H No 13 Sidoarjo
Location
Kab. sidoarjo,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Realism: Law Review
Published by Perkumpulan Sabat Ilmu Aditya
ISSN : 29878411     EISSN : 29872766     DOI : https://doi.org/10.71250/rlr.v1i1.4
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The focus of Realism: Law Review is publishing the manuscript of outcome study, and conceptual ideas which specific in the sector of Law Science. Realism: Law Review aims to provide a forum for lectures and researchers on applied law science to publish the original articles. The scope of Realism: Law Review is Criminal Law, Civil Law, International Law, Islamic Law, Agrarian Law, Administrative Law, Criminal Procedural Law, Commercial Law, Constitutional Law, Civil Procedural Law, Economic Law, Adat Law, and Environmental Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Realism: Law Review" : 5 Documents clear
PERLINDUNGAN DAN PENGAKUAN HAK ULAYAT MASYARAKAT ADAT BIAK PAPUA Prasetio, Dicky Eko
Realism: Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Realism: Law Review
Publisher : Sabtida

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71250/rlr.v2i1.25

Abstract

The Biak Customary Law Community in Papua has unique customary rights, particularly with regard to water aspects. The recognition and protection of the Biak Customary Law Community encounters problems when it is compared to the spaceport in Papua which is in the territory of the Biak Customary Law Community. Apart from that, from a juridical perspective, there is also a legal vacuum regarding regulations related to the Biak Customary Law Community, especially in Biak Numfor Regency. The legal issues analyzed in this study are related to the legal vacuum regarding the recognition and protection of the customary rights of the Biak Customary Law Community. This research is a normative legal research that focuses on the analysis of legal issues in the form of a legal void in the recognition and protection of the Biak Customary Law Community by using a concept and statutory approach. The results of the study confirm that the legal implication of the existence of a regulatory legal vacuum regarding the recognition and protection of the Biak Indigenous People, Papua, namely customary rights, traditions and local wisdom has the potential to no longer be enforceable due to the existence of a spaceport project in Biak. Future arrangements related to efforts to recognize and protect the Biak Customary Law Community, especially in terms of their customary rights, namely through the establishment of a Regional Regulation of the Biak Numfor Regency related to the Biak Customary Law Community, Papua and at the national level need to ratify the Indigenous Law Community Bill. Keywords: Ulayat Rights, Biak Customary Law Society, Recognition and Protection of Customary Law Communities.
ASPEK TEORITIK TENTANG RELEVANSI KAJIAN HUKUM PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DALAM PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN Sipayung, Baren; Hamongpranoto, Sarosa; Arifudin, Nur
Realism: Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Realism: Law Review
Publisher : Sabtida

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71250/rlr.v2i1.28

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengulas relevansi teoritis kajian hukum perundang-undangan dalam pembentukan peraturan. Hasilnya menyimpulkan peran strategis kajian hukum dalam memastikan keadilan, perlindungan hukum, dan keberlanjutan sistem hukum negara. Selain itu, kajian hukum juga memastikan kebijakan pemerintah sesuai kepentingan rakyat, mengatasi masalah hukum, mengatur proses pembentukan hukum, dan menciptakan kepastian hukum serta stabilitas sosial. Tantangan dalam pembangunan hukum negara mencakup kompleksitas perubahan hukum, keterbatasan sumber daya, aksesibilitas hukum yang lebih baik, dan peran teknologi dalam kajian hukum. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini merekomendasikan kerjasama antara akademisi, birokrat, dan profesi hukum untuk membentuk sistem hukum negara yang relevan dengan kebutuhan masyarakat dan memberikan perlindungan hukum maksimal bagi warga negara.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTION FOR ACTORS IN THE CREATIVE ECONOMY BASED ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS LAW NUMBER 28 OF 2014 CONCERNING COPYRIGHT Joice Soraya; Muhammad Ansy Althafzufar
Realism: Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Realism: Law Review
Publisher : Sabtida

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71250/rlr.v2i1.30

Abstract

Intellectual property rights (IPR) are rights that are born as a result of a person's intellectual labor; hence, IPR is a legal structure of intellectual property protection as a result of the work performed by the creator or inventor. This research approach combines normative and empirical legal research with descriptive research characteristics. According to the study's findings, there is still a lack of public awareness, particularly among creative economy players, in terms of preserving their inventions and not being registered, resulting in many infringements of their works. The existence of IPR may be a source of increased income for participants in the creative economy. Intellectual Property Rights are governed by the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright and the Government Regulation (PP) No. 56 of 2021 on the Management of Song and/or Music Copyright Royalties. As a result, anyone who infringes Intellectual Property Rights will face legal consequences.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP KASUS KAKEK SAMIRIN DALAM PERSPEKTIF SOSIOLOGI HUKUM Maha Putra, Eduard Awang; Ossita S , Gea; Muhammad Azwar , Lalu
Realism: Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Realism: Law Review
Publisher : Sabtida

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71250/rlr.v2i1.31

Abstract

AbstractThis research aims to analyze the law enforcement of the case against Grandfather Samirin from the perspective or view of Legal Sociology, as well as what kind of settlement mechanism can provide a sense of legal justice for poor people like Grandfather Samirin. This research method applies normative legal research methods, using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The results showed that the law enforcement used by law enforcers in the case of Grandfather Samirin was solely oriented towards a positivistic legalistic approach so that the actions taken by Grandfather Samirin were violations of the law as regulated in Article 107 letter d of the Plantation Law. However, in the view of legal sociology, the case of Samirin's grandfather is a small case with a small material value, even though it is carried out by a marginalized social group, poor and illiterate people, therefore, the presence of state law instead of giving birth to legal justice, on the contrary, creates legal injustice. Therefore, legal cases affecting the poor should use a more sociological and humanist approach. In the case of a law violation committed by Grandfather Samirin, he should not be prosecuted but can be resolved through a restorative justice approach. Keywords: Law Enforcement, Sociology of Law, Legal Positivism. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penegakan hukum terhadap kasus yang menimpa Kakek Samirin dalam perspektif atau pandangan Sosiologi Hukum, serta mekanisme penyelesaian seperti apa yang dapat memberikan rasa keadilan hukum bagi masyarakat miskin seperti Kakek Samirin. Metode Penelitian ini mengaplikasikan metode penelitian hukum normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Hasil penilitian menunjukan bahwa penegakan hukum yang digunakan para penegak hukum pada kasus Kakek Samirin hanya semata-mata berorientasi pada pendekatan legalistik positivistik sehingga tindakan yang dilakukan Kakek Samirin ialah pelanggaran hukum sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Pasal 107 huruf d UU Tentang Perkebunan. Namun dalam pandangan sosiologi hukum, kasus Kakek Samirin adalah perkara kecil dengan nilai meterial yang kecil, pun demikian dilakukan oleh kelompok sosial yang marginal, warga miskin yang buta bukum, karena itu, hadirnya hukum negara bukannya melahirkan keadilan hukum, justru sebaliknya menimbulkan ketidakadilan hukum. Karena itu, kasus hukum yang menimpa masyarakat miskin sebaiknya lebih menggunakan pendekatan yang lebih sosiologis dan humanis. Dalam kasus pelanggaran hukum yang dilakukan Kakek Samirin tidak semestinya dituntut secara hukum melainkan bisa dilakukan penyelesaian melalui pendekatan keadilan restorative justice. Kata Kunci : Penegakan Hukum, Sosiologi Hukum, Positivisme Hukum.
PENERAPAN ASAS TRANSITOIR ATAU ASAS LEX FAVOR REO PADA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA YANG DIVONIS PIDANA MATI SAAT PERALIHAN KUHP Nurdin, Mochamad Febrian
Realism: Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Realism: Law Review
Publisher : Sabtida

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71250/rlr.v2i1.32

Abstract

ABSTRACT At the beginning of 2023, Indonesia officially passed its new Criminal Code, namely Law No. 01 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code. Although this New Criminal Code has been passed in January 2023, this New Criminal Code does not immediately take effect, but is valid from 3 years after its promulgation, so that everyone knows about it (Article 624 of the New Criminal Code). At the time the new penal code was passed, it was a coincidence that Indonesia was in the midst of a major case involving a former police general who was sentenced to death in a court of first instance. So that raises questions among the public about whether the New Criminal Code can be an obstacle to the execution of death row criminals. Because of this, the author takes the formulation of the problem: 1) What is the difference from the Transitoir Principle or the Lex Favor Reo Principle in the Old Criminal Code and the New Criminal Code? 2) What is the juridical analysis of criminal offenders sentenced to death during the transition process from the old Criminal Code to the new Criminal Code? This research uses normative juridical, with a statutory approach. Keywords: Transitoir Principle, Lex Favor Reo Principle, Death Penalty, New Criminal Code. ABSTRAK Pada awal bulan 2023 kemarin, Indonesia secara resmi mengsahkan KUHP nya yang baru yakni UU No. 01 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Meskipun KUHP Baru ini telah disahkan pada Januari 2023, akan tetapi KUHP Baru ini tidak serta merta langsung berlaku, akan tetapi berlaku terhitung sejak 3 tahun setelah diundangkannya, agar setiap orang mengetahuinya (Pasal 624 KUHP Baru). Pada saat KUHP Baru ini disahkan, merupakan suatu kebetulan di Indonesia sedang dilanda kasus besar yang melibatkan mantan jendral polisi yang divonis pidana mati pada pengadilan tingkat pertama. Sehingga hal tersebut menimbulkan pertanyaan dikalangan masyarakat tentang apakah KUHP Baru bisa menjadi penghalang bagi eksekusi pidana mati pelaku tindak pidana. Karena hal tersebut maka penulis mengambil rumusan masalah: 1) Apa Perbedaan Dari Asas Transitoir atau Asas Lex Favor Reo Yang Ada Pada KUHP Lama dan KUHP Baru? 2) Bagaimana Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Yang Divonis Pidana Mati Pada Saat Proses Peralihan dari KUHP Lama ke KUHP Baru? Penelitian ini menggunakan yuridis normatif, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Kata kunci: Asas Transitoir, Asas Lex Favor Reo, Pidana Mati, KUHP Baru.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Realism: Law Review (in progress) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Realism: Law Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Realism: Law Review Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Realism: Law Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Realism: Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Realism: Law Review Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Realism: Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Realism: Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Realism: Law Review