cover
Contact Name
Andrian Saputra
Contact Email
andriansaputra@fkip.unila.ac.id
Phone
+6285768233166
Journal Mail Official
jpmipa@fkip.unila.ac.id
Editorial Address
FKIP Universitas Lampung Jl. Prof. Dr. Ir. Sumantri Brojonegoro, Gedong Meneng, Kec. Rajabasa, Kota Bandar Lampung
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : 14112531     EISSN : 26855488     DOI : http://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa
Core Subject : Education,
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA (JPMIPA) focused on mathematics education, science education, and the use of technology in the educational field. In more detail, the scope of interest are, but not limited to: STEM/STEAM Education Environmental and Sustainability Education Scientific Literacy Computer-based Education and Digital Competence Higher Order Thinking Skills Multicultural and Inclusive Education Attitude towards Mathematics and Science Learning Models, Methods, Strategies of Math & Science Learning Virtual and Blended Learning Teacher Education
Articles 1 Documents
Search results for "question items of magnitude and motion topics in several high school physics textbooks" : 1 Documents clear
Question Items of Magnitude and Motion Topics in Several High School Physics Textbooks: A Cognitive Level Analysis Lubis, Deli Anggraeni; Nurlina, Nurlina; Marisda, Dewi Hikmah; Riskawati, Riskawati
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 23, No 4 (2022): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the percentage of cognitive achievement level questions and compare cognitive level achievement based on thinking stages (LOTs and HOTs) in physics textbooks for class X SMA for the content of magnitude and motion. This type of research is descriptive research with a case study design that is analyzed qualitatively. The source of the data in this study was a class X physics textbook on magnitude and motion. The research subjects were evaluation questions in five books, hereinafter referred to as book A, book B, book C, book D, and book E. The results of this study indicated that the highest proportion of cognitive levels used in the questions from the five physics books was C4 (analyzing). and the lowest is C6 (create). The percentage of questions for each cognitive level are: C1 (remembering) 10%, C2 (understanding) 26.85%, C3 (applying) 18%, C4 (analyzing) 51.2%, C5 (evaluating) 5.75% and C6 (create) with a percentage of 0%. This shows that the percentage of HOTS cognitive level items (56.95%) is higher than the LOTs level (43.05%). It is hoped that the results of this study will provide information to high school teachers and prospective physics teacher students to develop practice questions that are oriented towards high-level skills. Keywords: textbook analysis, HOTs, LOTs, cognitive level. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i4.pp1481-1492

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 1