cover
Contact Name
Agus Sumpena
Contact Email
agus.sumpena@unpad.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
banijournal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Wahana Graha Lt. 1 & 2 Jl. Mampang Prapatan No. 2, Jakarta 12760
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
BANI Arbitration and Law Journal
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30890047     DOI : https://doi.org/10.63400/balj
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
BANI Arbitration and Law Journal is a journal in the fields of arbitration, dispute resolution and law regulating the mechanism of arbitration and dispute resolution in particular in Indonesia and the regions, including South-East Asia (ASEAN). BANI Arbitration and Law Journal publishes twice a year in April and October. BANI Arbitration and Law Journal invites academics, researchers and practitioners to submit their unpublished articles or research on arbitration, dispute resolution or their related regulations. The language of journal is Indonesian and English. BANI Arbitration and Law Journal objective is set to become the leading international journal on arbitration focusing the progressive development of arbitration and alternative dispute resolution and their regulations. BANI Arbitration and Law Journal publishes theoretical and practical contributions on arbitration, dispute resolutions and their regulations.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): BANI Arbitration and Law Journal, Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2024" : 5 Documents clear
Dampak dari Putusan No. 15/PUU-XII/2014 terhadap Eksistensi Arbitrase di Indonesia: Menguji Kembali Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Rossdiono, Anangga W.; Taqwa, Muhamad Dzadit
BANI Arbitration and Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): BANI Arbitration and Law Journal, Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2024
Publisher : Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63400/balj.v1i1.1

Abstract

AbstrakSesuai dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014, Penjelasan Pasal 70 Undang-Undang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa bertentangan dengan UUD 1945 Republik Indonesia; sehingga tidak lagi memiliki kekuatan hukum yang mengikat. Substansi dari penjelasan tersebut mengharuskan pemohon yang berusaha membatalkan putusan arbitrase untuk terlebih dahulu membuktikan alasan pengajuan mereka di Pengadilan Negeri. Berdasarkan putusan ini, syarat tersebut tidak lagi ada, sehingga mempermudah proses pembatalan putusan arbitrase. Di sisi lain, keberadaan Pasal 70 undang-undang itu sendiri masih menjadi perdebatan. Dalam perkembangannya, pasal ini memberikan berbagai implikasi hukum yang negatif bagi lembaga penyelesaian sengketa di luar pengadilan, termasuk lembaga arbitrase, serta pihak-pihak yang menyelesaikan sengketa melalui arbitrase. Meskipun demikian, mekanisme ini secara normatif bertujuan untuk mengoreksi kesalahan formal dalam putusan arbitrase. Tulisan ini berusaha menggambarkan rasionalisasi di balik perlunya mempertahankan atau menghilangkan mekanisme tersebut dengan meninjau kembali Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014. Sebagai kesimpulan di akhir artikel, disarankan agar Pasal 70 Undang-Undang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa perlu dihilangkan atau setidaknya dibatasi secara ketat. AbstractPursuant to Constitutional Court Decision Number 15/PUU-XII/2014, the Elucidation of Article 70 of the Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Law was contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia; thus, it no longer had binding legal force. The substance of the elucidation required applicants attempting to annul an arbitral award to first prove the grounds for their application before the District Court. According to this decision, such a requirement did not longer exist, thus it would be easier to annull an arbitral award. On the other hand, the existence of Article 70 of the law itself is still debatable. In its development, this article has provided various legal implications that have negative values for dispute resolution institutions outside the court, including arbitration institutions, as well as parties resolving their disputes through arbitration. Nonetheless, this mechanism is intended normatively to correct formal errors in an arbitral award. This paper attempts to describe the rationalization behind the need to maintain or eliminate such a mechanism by re-examining Constitutional Court Decision Number 15/PUU-XII/2014. As a resolution at the end of the article, it is Article 70 of the Law on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution that should need to be eliminated or at least strictly limited.
The Implementation of Parties Autonomy and Authority of Bani Region of Business Disputes Resolution Sidik, Jafar
BANI Arbitration and Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): BANI Arbitration and Law Journal, Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2024
Publisher : Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63400/balj.v1i1.2

Abstract

Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia so called BANI Arbitration Center (“BAC”) is an independent institution that provides services in settling disputes outside the state court. BANI is domiciled in Jakarta and there are BANI Region located in various big cities in Indonesia: Bandung, Surabaya, Medan, Denpasar, Palembang, Pontianak, and Jambi, acting autonomously and independently in upholding law and justice. The parties still have disagreements on where to take themselves if there is a dispute between them. Dispute settlement through BANI has become the choice of business actors to resolve their trade disputes. In addition to the characteristics of being fast, efficient, and thorough, arbitration adheres to the principle of a win-win solution and is straight forward because there are no appeals and cassation institutions. The arbitration fee is also more measurable because the process is faster. Another advantage of arbitration is that its decisions are immediately (final) and binding, apart from its confidential nature, in which the trial process and arbitration award are not published. The object of the study is the settlement of business dispute through BANI Region. The purpose of this writing is to analyze and describe (a) how does the implementation of parties authonomy in arbitration; (b) can the parties choose the forum of arbitration through BANI Region? (c) Has BANI Region have the authority or competency to examine and decide business disputes? (d) to what extent is the role of BANI Region in law enforcement in Indonesia? This paper uses a normative juridical approach with a qualitative analysis method on RI Law No. 30 Year 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution and the 2022 BANI Rules and Procedures. The conclusion are that the disputing parties (a) They implemented parties authonomy in arbitration; namely befor, during and after dispute arises till the implement of arbitral award; (b) They can choose forum for dispute settlement through BANI Region; (c) BANI Region have the authority to examine and decide trade disputes; (d) BANI Region have a strategic role in law enforcement in Indonesia.
Prinsip Itikad Baik (Good Faith) dalam Hukum Kontrak Adolf, Huala
BANI Arbitration and Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): BANI Arbitration and Law Journal, Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2024
Publisher : Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63400/balj.v1i1.3

Abstract

AbstrakKonsep good-faith (itikad baik) sudah menjadi bagian dari setiap sistem hukum di berbagai negara di dunia. Salah satu permasalahan dengan prinsip ini adalah pengertiannya: apa yang dimaksud dengan prinisp ini. Tulisan ini berupaya meneliti dan mendapatkan pengertian yang dapat merepresentasikan pengertian prinsip ini dalam hukum kontrak. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode deskriptif analisis. Bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah berbagai instrumen hukum internasional umumnya seperti Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG) dan UNIDROIT Principles of International Contracts, hukum kontrak nasional, pendapat sarjana, putusan pengadilan nasional Indonesia. Tulisan ini menyimpulkan, prinsip good faith memiliki makna menjalankan kewajiban para pihak dengan benar berdasarkan kontrak. AbstractThe principle of good faith has become an important element in legal systems in the world. One of the problems of the principle is its meaning: what good faith would mean. This article tried to trace and find out the meaning of good faith in contract law. This article applied the descriptive analysis method. The legal data used is the international legal instruments on contract. They included the Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG) and the UNIDROIT Principles of International Contracts, national contract law, the opinion of scholars, the decision of the Indonesian court. This article concluded, the priniciple of good faith would mean the application obligations in a right manner based on the contract.
Urgensi Amandemen Terhadap Pasal 70 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Sebagai Salah Satu Variabel Penting dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi Indonesia Yulwansyah, Adhitya; Nataatmadja, Aria Adipura
BANI Arbitration and Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): BANI Arbitration and Law Journal, Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2024
Publisher : Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63400/balj.v1i1.4

Abstract

AbstrakPenyelesaian sengketa bisnis/komersial merupakan salah satu variabel penting dalam pembangunan ekonomi, karena hal ini menjadi salah satu indikator yang digunakan oleh komunitas bisnis untuk berinvestasi atau menjalankan usaha di suatu negara. Hal ini juga tercermin dalam kemudahan berusaha (Ease of Doing Business, EoDB) yang dirilis oleh Badan Koordinasi Penanaman Modal (BKPM) Indonesia. Salah satu mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa adalah melalui arbitrase yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (UUAAPS). Arbitrase telah menjadi metode yang dipilih oleh komunitas bisnis untuk menyelesaikan sengketa mereka dibandingkan dengan pengadilan negeri, karena sifat putusan arbitrase yang bersifat final dan mengikat. Namun, di samping beberapa keuntungan menggunakan arbitrase, hukum arbitrase Indonesia memungkinkan adanya kemungkinan untuk membatalkan putusan arbitrase. Dalam beberapa tahun terakhir, permohonan pembatalan putusan arbitrase meningkat sejak diterbitkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014 pada tahun 2014 yang menyatakan bahwa penjelasan Pasal 70 undang-undang arbitrase tidak mengikat secara hukum. AbstractBusiness/commercial dispute settlement is one of important variables in the economic development, as it is one of the indicators used by business communities to invest or doing business in a country. This matter is also reflected in the Ease of Doing Business (EoDB) Released by Indonesia Investment Coordinating Board (BKPM). One of the dispute settlement mechanisms is through arbitration as regulated in the Indonesia’s Arbitration Law No. 30 of 1999 (UUAAPS). Arbitration has been a preferred method chosen by the business communities to resolve their disputes rather than to the state court due to arbitration’s final and binding characteristic. However, beside some advantages of using arbitration, the Indonesia arbitration law allows the possibility to annul an arbitration award. In recent years, the arbitration award annulment request arises since the publication of the Supreme Court Decree No. 15/PUU-XII/2014 in 2014 which stated the elucidation on article 70 arbitration law is not legally binding.
Sinergitas Perguruan Tinggi dan Lembaga Arbitrase dalam Pembangunan Hukum Dibidang Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Hariyanto, Bambang
BANI Arbitration and Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): BANI Arbitration and Law Journal, Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2024
Publisher : Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63400/balj.v1i1.5

Abstract

AbstrakArbitrase sebagai sebuah instrumen penyelesaian sengketa sangat diperlukan dalam perkembangan hukum dan pembangunan hukum modern. Minimnya pengetahuan publik akan arbitrase dinilai tidak hanya dirasakan oleh masyarakat umum tetapi termasuk juga dirasakan oleh kalangan dunia pendidikan. Minimnya arbitrase dimasukan dalam kurikulum perguruan tinggi merupakan potret bahwa arbitrase tidak begitu populer di program studi yang memiliki relevansi dengan arbitrase seperti fakultas hukum dan fakultas ekonomi dan bisnis. Literasi dan pengetahuan yang seharusnya di dapatkan di perguruan tinggi terkait arbitrase menjadikan arbitrase tidak populer dipilih sebagai tempat penyelesaian sengketa. Ditambah lagi sifat persidangan arbitrase yang tertutup yang menyebabkan tidak terdapat ruang bagi publik khususnya mahasiswa untuk mengenal persidangan arbitrase secara langsung layaknya persidangan di Pengadilan yang terbuka untuk umum. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi, mengevaluasi dan menganalisis mengenai sinergitas perguruan tinggi dan lembaga arbitrase dalam pembangunan hukum terkait penyelesaian sengketa bisnis di Indonesia. Metode penelitian menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan filsafat, pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan futuristik. Hasil penelitian menjawab bahwa perguran tinggi dan lembaga arbitrase memiliki peran penting dalam pembangunan hukum di sektor penyelesaian sengketa bisnis. Sinergitas kampus dan Lembaga arbitrase dalam dalam upaya edukasi tentang penyelesaian sengketa bisnis dinilai sebagai tahap awal dalam menyiapkan para calon pelaku bisnis dan praktisi bisnis yang terlibat dalam sengketa termasuk dalam mengkader para pemangku kepentingan yang berperan dalam memutus sengketa bisnis. Pada akhirnya, sinergitas kampus dan perguruan tinggi dalam memberikan pengajaran/pendidikan terkait arbitrase menjadi support system terhadap penyelesaian sengketa bisnis di masa depan, yang tidak hanya berdampak pada pemahaman tentang arbitrase dan kedudukannya dalam penyelesaian sengketa bisnis, tetapi juga berdampak pada utuhnya pemahaman bagi mahasiswa sebagai penegak hukum dan pelaku bisnis di masa depan bahwa penyelesaian sengketa tidak selalu di pengadilan. AbstractArbitration as a dispute resolution instrument is essential in the development of law and the advancement of modern legal systems. The public's lack of knowledge about arbitration is not only felt by the general population but also within the educational community. The limited inclusion of arbitration in university curricula reflects its low popularity in study programs relevant to arbitration, such as law, economics, and business faculties. The lack of literacy and knowledge that should be obtained at the university level regarding arbitration contributes to its unpopularity as a chosen method of dispute resolution. Additionally, the closed nature of arbitration proceedings prevents the public, particularly students, from experiencing arbitration trials directly, unlike court trials that are open to the public. The aim of this research was to identify, evaluate, and analyze the synergy between universities and arbitration institutions in the development of legal frameworks related to business dispute resolution in Indonesia. The research employed a normative juridical method with a conceptual approach, philosophical approach, legislative approach, and futuristic approach. The findings indicated that universities and arbitration institutions play a crucial role in the development of law in the field of business dispute resolution. The synergy between universities and arbitration institutions in educating about business dispute resolution was seen as an initial step in preparing future business actors and practitioners involved in disputes, including training stakeholders who play a role in resolving business disputes. Ultimately, the collaboration between universities and arbitration institutions in providing education related to arbitration became a support system for business dispute resolution in the future, impacting not only the understanding of arbitration and its position in business dispute resolution but also providing a comprehensive understanding for students as future legal enforcers and business actors that dispute resolution did not always take place in court.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5