cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Agus Sumpena
Contact Email
agus.sumpena@unpad.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
banijournal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Wahana Graha Lt. 1 & 2 Jl. Mampang Prapatan No. 2, Jakarta 12760
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
BANI Arbitration and Law Journal
Published by Badan Arbirase Nasional Indonesia
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30890047     DOI : https://doi.org/10.63400/balj
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
BANI Arbitration and Law Journal is a journal in the fields of arbitration, dispute resolution and law regulating the mechanism of arbitration and dispute resolution in particular in Indonesia and the regions, including South-East Asia (ASEAN). BANI Arbitration and Law Journal publishes twice a year in April and October. BANI Arbitration and Law Journal invites academics, researchers and practitioners to submit their unpublished articles or research on arbitration, dispute resolution or their related regulations. The language of journal is Indonesian and English. BANI Arbitration and Law Journal objective is set to become the leading international journal on arbitration focusing the progressive development of arbitration and alternative dispute resolution and their regulations. BANI Arbitration and Law Journal publishes theoretical and practical contributions on arbitration, dispute resolutions and their regulations.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): BANI Arbitration and Law Journal, Volume 1, Issue 2, April 2025" : 5 Documents clear
Arbitrator: Negarawan Pengusung Postulat Honeste Vivere Purwanto, Purwanto; Hage, Markus Yohanis
BANI Arbitration and Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): BANI Arbitration and Law Journal, Volume 1, Issue 2, April 2025
Publisher : Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63400/balj.v1i2.13

Abstract

AbstrakArbitrase telah berkembang dari mekanisme sederhana menjadi sistem yang kompleks dalam menyelesaikan sengketa perdagangan internasional. Prinsip utama arbitrase mencakup otonomi para pihak, pacta sunt servanda, itikad baik, independensi, non-intervensi, dan efisiensi, sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 1999. Penelitian ini berangkat dari pentingnya profesionalisme dan akuntabilitas arbitrator dalam memastikan keadilan yang efektif dan dapat dipercaya. Rumusan masalah penelitian ini adalah bagaimana idealnya arbitrator menurut postulat Honeste Vivere. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mendeskripsikan peran arbitrator sebagai negarawan yang menjunjung tinggi moralitas hukum dan keadilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa arbitrator yang ideal harus memiliki integritas, kapasitas hukum yang mumpuni, serta komitmen terhadap keadilan substantif. Dengan menjunjung prinsip Honeste Vivere, arbitrator berperan sebagai primus inter pares yang tidak hanya menerapkan hukum secara teknis tetapi juga mempertimbangkan aspek moral dan sosial dalam setiap putusannya.AbstractArbitration has evolved from a simple mechanism into a complex system for resolving international trade disputes. The main principles of arbitration include party autonomy, pacta sunt servanda, good faith, independence, non-intervention, and efficiency, as stipulated in Law No. 30 of 1999. This study emphasizes the importance of professionalism and accountability in arbitrators to ensure effective and reliable justice. The research problem formulated in this study is: how should an ideal arbitrator be defined according to the Honeste Vivere postulate? The purpose of this study is to describe the role of an arbitrator as a statesman who upholds legal morality and justice. The study's findings indicate that an ideal arbitrator must possess integrity, sufficient legal expertise, and a strong commitment to substantive justice. By upholding the Honeste Vivere principle, an arbitrator acts as a primus inter pares, not only applying the law technically but also considering moral and social aspects in every decision made
Peran Notaris dalam Proses Arbitrase Sidik, Jafar
BANI Arbitration and Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): BANI Arbitration and Law Journal, Volume 1, Issue 2, April 2025
Publisher : Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63400/balj.v1i2.14

Abstract

Seperempat abad lebih usia Undang-Undang tentang Arbitrase Indonesia, yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang “Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa”, namun undang-undang tersebut masih belum dipahami dengan baik bahwa terdapat amanah atau pesan penting dari uundang-undang tersebut sebagaimana disebutkan dalam Pasal 9 ayat (2) bagi Pejabat Umum Notaris. Notaris adalah pejabat umum yang berwenang untuk membuat akta otentik dan kewenangan lainnya sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Undang-Undang No.2 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris, antara lain dalam Pasal 15 ayat (2) huruf (e) untuk memberikan penyuluhan hukum sehubungan dengan pembuatan akta. Artikel ini akan membahas seputar amanah atau pesan UU tersebut. Artikel ini akan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan deskriptif analitis serta studi kepustakaan (library research).
The Enforceability of the Decision of the Construction Dispute Board in Indonesia Haliman, Yudi; Adolf, Huala; Fakhriah, Efa Laela; Murwadji, Tarsisius
BANI Arbitration and Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): BANI Arbitration and Law Journal, Volume 1, Issue 2, April 2025
Publisher : Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63400/balj.v1i2.15

Abstract

The emergence of the Dispute Board in Indonesia through Law Number 2 of 2017 on Construction Services raises several challenges, including the complexity of the dispute resolution process, the unclear legal status of decisions, and the lack of recognition within the existing arbitration legal framework. Using a legal normative approach, this research explores the issue in the dispute resolution mechanism under the Law Number 2 of 2017, analyses the main obstacles, and formulates recommendations for improving the effectiveness of the Dispute Board. This research in particular emphasized the enforceability of the decision of the Construction Dispute Board. The method to this problems was to analyze the provisions under the Law. In addition this article also analyzed the main provision on the settlement of disputes, including the possibility of the legal recognition of the Dispute Construction Board in view of the institutional aspects under the Law No 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. This article found that the complexity of the dispute resolution process through the Construction Dispute Board, along with the high cost and lack of clarity regarding the enforceability of judgments, creates uncertainty for the parties. This marred the deicison of the Construction Dispute Board.
Urgensi Pembaharuan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Mediasi Wiko, Garuda
BANI Arbitration and Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): BANI Arbitration and Law Journal, Volume 1, Issue 2, April 2025
Publisher : Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63400/balj.v1i2.16

Abstract

AbstrakMediasi merupakah salah satu bentuk Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (APS) yang menawarkan kelebihan dibanding litigasi dan arbitrase dari sisi biaya, fleksibilitas, maupun waktu penyelesiaan. Namun, dalam praktik di Indonesia, media masih sering dipandang sebagai mekanisme formalitas yang dilalui para pihak sebelum memasuki forum ajudikatif. Meskipun telah diatur dalam sistem hukum positif sejak berlakunya Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan APS, pengaturan mediasi masih sangat terbatas dan belum mampu menjawab kebutuhan praktis di lapangan. Mediasi di pengadilan diatur melalui beberapa Peraturan Mahkamah Agung, termasuk Perma No. 1 tahun 2016 dan Perma No. 3 Tahun 2022, tetapi ruang lingkupnya hanya mencakup perkara perdata di pengadilan. Di luar itu, mekanisme mediasi masih minim basis regulasi. Dalam perkembangan global, mediasi semakin mendapat tempat sebagai instrumen penyelesaian sengketa yang kredibel, ditandai dengan disahkannya Singapore Convention on Mediation tahun 2019. Konvensi ini memberikan jaminan eksekutorial bagi kesepakatan hasil mediasi lintas negara, sehingga berperan penting dalam menciptakan iklim bisnis yang aman dan stabil. Bagi Indonesia, pembaruan hukum mediasi menjadi mendesak, baik melalui pembentukan UU Mediasi yang komprehensif maupun dengan meratifikasi Konvensi Mediasi. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk memberikan argumentasi pembaruan regulasi mediasi di Indonesia melalui pembentukan UU Mediasi dan ratifikasi konvensi internasional agar mediasi dapat berfungsi optimal sebagai instrumen penyelesaian sengketa di era modern, baik nasional maupun internasional. Abstract Mediation is a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) that offers advantages over litigation and arbitration in terms of cost, flexibility, and resolution time. However, in Indonesian practice, media is still often viewed as a formality mechanism that parties go through before entering an adjudicatory forum. Although it has been regulated in the positive legal system since the enactment of Law No. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and APS, mediation regulations are still very limited and unable to meet practical needs in the field. Mediation in court is regulated by several Supreme Court Regulations, including Perma No. 1 of 2016 and Perma No. 3 of 2022, but their scope only covers civil cases in court. Beyond that, the mediation mechanism still lacks a regulatory basis. In global developments, mediation is increasingly gaining ground as a credible dispute resolution instrument, marked by the ratification of the Singapore Convention on Mediation in 2019. This convention provides enforceable guarantees for agreements resulting from cross-border mediation, thus playing a vital role in creating a safe and stable business climate. For Indonesia, reforming mediation law is urgent, both through the establishment of a comprehensive Mediation Law and by ratifying the Mediation Convention. This article aims to provide arguments for reforming mediation regulations in Indonesia through the establishment of a Mediation Law and the ratification of international conventions so that mediation can function optimally as a dispute resolution instrument in the modern era, both nationally and internationally.
Kant’s Concept of Moral Autonomy as a Philosophical Justification of Party Autonomy Prasetiyo, Eko Dwi
BANI Arbitration and Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): BANI Arbitration and Law Journal, Volume 1, Issue 2, April 2025
Publisher : Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63400/balj.v1i2.17

Abstract

One of the important doctrines in international private law, especially in the field of contract law, is the party autonomy doctrine. Although it has gained enormous acceptance, there is still debate about the existence of the doctrine, as well as disagreements about the exact parameters, scope and boundaries of the doctrine. Kant's categorical imperative: "Act so that the maxim of thy will can always at the same time hold good as a principle of universal legislation," is the principle of individual moral autonomy as a universal law-making agent based on the autonomy of the will. This principle provides a philosophical justification for the existence of party autonomy. Based on Kant's idea, a categorical imperative is obtained that guides every rational being in viewing the doctrine of party autonomy, namely by giving respect to every free choice made by the parties in relation to disputes that occur between them. In this way, a transcendental understanding of party autonomy is obtained, which is respect for all rational beings to recognize and uphold every choice made by the parties in a dispute resolution that occurs.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): BANI Arbitration and Law Journal, Volume 2, Issue 1, October 2025 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): BANI Arbitration and Law Journal, Volume 1, Issue 2, April 2025 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): BANI Arbitration and Law Journal, Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2024