cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Sukardi Malik
Contact Email
corpusjuris.manggalajournal@gmail.com
Phone
+6281917222929
Journal Mail Official
corpusjuris.manggalajournal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Merdeka Raya, Karang Pule, Kecamatan Sekarbela, Kota Mataram, NTB 83116, Indonesia
Location
Kota mataram,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
Corpus Juris : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published by Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31099173     DOI : https://doi.org/10.62335/corpusjuris.v1i1.743
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics in the fields of Criminal Law, Civil Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Economic Law, Medical Law, Customary Law, Environmental Law and another section related contemporary issues in law
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 8 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): CORPUS JURIS : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2025" : 8 Documents clear
EFEKTIVITAS PELAKSANAAN PIDANA DENDA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA Windi Ardiansyah; Mohamad Ismed; Hedwig Adianto Mau
CORPUS JURIS : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): CORPUS JURIS : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/corpusjuris.v1i2.1919

Abstract

This study addresses two legal issues: first, the effectiveness of fines in corruption cases, and second, how fines are implemented as a deterrent for corruption perpetrators. This study aims to determine the extent to which fines are implemented in court decisions and to test their effectiveness in eradicating corruption in Indonesia. In the corruption cases of Muhammad Lutfi, Taufik Ramadhi, and Cokro Nogoro, it was found that judges imposed fines, but their implementation still faces obstacles, particularly when the convict is unable to pay the fine. This situation results in the effectiveness of fines as a legal instrument being less than optimal, often resulting in a lack of maximum deterrent effect. Therefore, strengthening regulations and consistency in the application of fines are needed so that they truly function as a means of law enforcement and eradicating corruption
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TERHADAP PERSELISIHAN PERJANJIAN PEMEGANG SAHAM PERSEROAN TERBATAS DI TINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM Jemy Ronald Vito; Wira Franciska; Gatut Hendrotriwidodo
CORPUS JURIS : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): CORPUS JURIS : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/corpusjuris.v1i2.2055

Abstract

In this study, the object of analysis is disputes arising from Shareholders Agreements in Limited Liability Companies (PT). The legal phenomenon examined concerns why disputes continue to occur despite shareholders being bound by a Shareholders Agreement that should, in principle, be adhered to as law by those who create it. This research aims to analyze the types of disputes that emerge from the implementation of Shareholders Agreements within a company, the dispute resolution mechanisms employed, and the application of the principle of legal certainty in the dispute resolution process. The research method used is normative legal research with a normative juridical approach, conducted through the examination of laws and regulations, literature, expert opinions, and relevant legal concepts. The results of the study indicate that disputes frequently arising from Shareholders Agreements are caused by differences in interpretation of the agreement’s provisions, breaches of contractual terms, divergent interests and business strategies, rights to dividend distribution, and dispute settlement issues. Dispute resolution mechanisms may be pursued through litigation in court or non-litigation methods such as arbitration. The most effective mechanism for realizing the principle of legal certainty is arbitration-such as the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) and similar institutions-due to its final and binding decisions as well as its ability to ensure confidentiality and maintain good relations among shareholders. From the perspective of the principle of legal certainty, dispute resolution between shareholders should ideally provide protection for the rights of the parties and ensure that the agreement is implemented in accordance with applicable legal provisions
URGENSI HAK IMUNITAS PENDAMPING KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN SEKSUAL DALAM PROSES PERADILAN Abdul Ismail; MD Shodiq; Mohamad Ismed
CORPUS JURIS : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): CORPUS JURIS : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/corpusjuris.v1i2.2077

Abstract

This study aims to find out how the implementation of the right to immunity of victims in the crime of sexual violence; and to find out how urgent it is to implement the provisions of the right to immunity of victims in the ideal sexual assault crime in the future. The method used in this study is normative legal research conducted as an effort to obtain the necessary data in relation to the problem. This research uses a legal approach (Statute Apporach), a conceptual approach, an analytical approach, a case approach (Case Approcah) and a comparative approach which in principle are sourced from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials with qualitative legal material analysis techniques The results of the study show that the right to immunity of the victim's companion is declarative and has not provided real protection. The main factors include weak technical arrangements, lack of understanding of law enforcement officials, a formalistic perspective that favors the victim, and a patriarchal culture that worsens the position of companion. Cases of criminalization, intimidation, and obstruction such as LBH Yogyakarta, UNRI, and UPTD PPA Makassar confirm that the permaping is still in a vulnerable position. Therefore, the implementation of the right to immunity for victims of sexual abuse in Indonesia has not been effective and requires strengthening regulations, increasing the capacity of the apparatus, clear operational protection, and changing the legal culture so that the criminal justice system is truly responsive and on the side of the victim.
PENERAPAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI ANAK PELAKU  TINDAK PIDANA DALAM PERSPEKTIF UNDANG – UNDANG SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA  ANAK UU NO.11 TAHUN 2012 DI INDONESIA Eka Kurniawatie
CORPUS JURIS : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): CORPUS JURIS : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/corpusjuris.v1i2.2111

Abstract

Penerapan perlindungan hukum bagi anak pelaku tindak pidana merupakan isu penting dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia, terutama setelah berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak. UU ini menegaskan bahwa setiap anak, termasuk anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum, berhak memperoleh perlindungan khusus untuk menjamin kelangsungan hidup, tumbuh kembang, serta masa depannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk dan implementasi perlindungan hukum terhadap anak sebagai pelaku tindak pidana dalam perspektif UU Perlindungan Anak, serta mengidentifikasi kendala yang dihadapi aparat penegak hukum dalam penerapannya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum bagi anak pelaku tindak pidana diterapkan melalui prinsip kepentingan terbaik bagi anak, jaminan atas pendampingan hukum dan sosial, penghindaran dari kekerasan selama proses hukum, serta penerapan tindakan dan sanksi yang bersifat edukatif dan rehabilitatif. Namun, implementasinya masih menghadapi berbagai kendala dilapangan dan khususnya bagi penegakan hukum terkait proses pemidanaan anak itu sendiri, seperti keterbatasan lembaga khusus anak, kurangnya pemahaman aparat penegak hukum terhadap pendekatan keadilan restoratif, serta minimnya dukungan keluarga,sesungguhnya peran keluarga itu sangat penting mengingat anak berasal dari keluarga tumbuh dan berkembang dari keluarga pula dan sangat mempunyai pengaruh besar terhadap tumbuh kembang anak dalam pola asuh sehingga membentuk anak dari dalam dirinya dan keluarga merupakan faktor internaldan merupakan support sistem dalam pola asuh dan tumbuh kembang,serta pembentukan karakter watak dan sifat sebelum anak masuk kedunia luar atau eksternal  dan selain itu  lingkungan sosial juga mempengaruhi tumbuh kembang anak dari luaratau merupakan faktor eksternal . Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa keberhasilan perlindungan hukum bagi anak pelaku tindak pidana sangat bergantung pada sinergi antar peran keluarga, lembaga penegak hukum, kebijakan yang konsisten,pemerintah serta partisipasi masyarakat dalam mendukung pemulihan anak karena anak adalah tunas bangsa dan generasi penerus bangsa dan diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi positif terhadap bangsa
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TENTANG PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH YANG TERJADI PADA TINGKAT DESA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA Muhammad Ikbal; Suci Kusumawardhani
CORPUS JURIS : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): CORPUS JURIS : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/corpusjuris.v1i2.2112

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tentang peran kepala Desa dalam menyelesaikan kasus sengketa tanah yang terjadi diwilayahnya dalam pandangan hukum pidana, serta ingin mengetahui faktor-faktor yang menjadi kendala kepala Desa dalam penyelesaian sengketa tanah yang terjadi di Desanya. Dalam Pasal 26 ayat (4) poin (K) Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa menyebutkan kepala desa berkewaiban menyelesaikan perselisihan masyarakat secara damai. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian normatif serta sifat penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriftif kualitatif dengan analisa deduktif. Hasil dari penelitian ini bahwa kepala Desa dalam menyelesaikan sengketa tanah selain berpedoman pada Undang-Undang Tentang Desa juga berpedoman dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 72 Tahun 2005 tentang Desa dimana kepala desa itu menyelesaikan kasus dan sengketa harus berdasarkan suatu nilai-nilai keraifan lokal yang ada. Selain itu kepala juga berperan sebagai hakim perdamaian desa sebagai bentuk meringkan beberapa perkara yang masuk kepengadilan. Beberap yang menjadi kendala dalam penyelesaian sengketa tanah pada tingkat Desa jika dilihat dalam perspektif hukum pidana karena adanya legitimasi dan kepercayaan masyarakat dan selalu dipertanyakan tentang hal tersebut, adanya keterbatasan pengetahuan hukum kepala desa, adanya sikap para pihak yang sama-sama keras dalam mempertahankan pendapatnya, kepala Desa memiliki lingkup wewenang sangat terbatas, terbatasnya sumber daya dan fasilitas untuk mediasi, terjadinya benturan hukum adat dan hukum positif.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM MENGENAI TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL PERUSAHAAN DALAM MEWUJUDKAN PEMBANGUNAN BERKELANJUTAN harmaein harmaein; Khalimi Khalimi; Gatut Hendro Tri Widodo
CORPUS JURIS : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): CORPUS JURIS : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/corpusjuris.v1i2.2124

Abstract

This research is motivated by the existence of legal provisions governing corporate social responsibility (CSR), which are expected to contribute to sustainable development, yet in practice various irregularities remain prevalent, including the misuse of CSR funds by several major corporations. The issues examined concern the legal framework of CSR under Law Number 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies and the extent to which legal certainty is ensured in its implementation to achieve sustainable development. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal construction of CSR and to evaluate its effectiveness and legal certainty in supporting sustainable economic, social, and environmental development. The theoretical foundations employed are the theory of legal certainty and responsive law theory. This research employs a normative legal methodology using the statutory approach, the case approach, and the comparative approach. The data sources consist of primary legal materials such as statutes and government regulations, secondary legal materials including literature, journals, and expert opinions, and tertiary legal materials such as dictionaries and information media. Data were collected through library research, while analysis was carried out using grammatical and systematic interpretation to assess the consistency of CSR provisions with the concept of legal certainty and their implementation in practice. The results of the study indicate that, normatively, the regulation of CSR in Indonesia has a clear legal basis through Law Number 40 of 2007 and Government Regulation Number 47 of 2012. However, the legal certainty of its implementation remains suboptimal due to normative ambiguities, particularly regarding budgeting mechanisms, standards of propriety and reasonableness, and sanctions for companies that fail to implement CSR. Cases of CSR misappropriation further demonstrate weaknesses in oversight and inconsistent enforcement. This research concludes that to realize sustainable development, regulatory strengthening, enhanced transparency, and more effective supervisory mechanisms for CSR implementation are required.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KURATOR PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PEMALSUAN SURAT DALAM PENGURUSAN HARTA PAILIT Ade Nandar Silitonga; Tofik Yanuar Chandra; Mohamad Ismed
CORPUS JURIS : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): CORPUS JURIS : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/corpusjuris.v1i2.2223

Abstract

In recent years, there has been growing concern regarding indications of an increase in the practice of document forgery committed by certain curators in the context of bankruptcy administration. This study aims to examine and analyze the forms of criminal acts of document forgery in the administration of bankruptcy by curators, as well as the criminal liability of curators who commit such offenses. The theoretical framework employed in this research includes the theory of criminal liability and the theory of punishment. The results of the study indicate that the forms of criminal acts of document forgery in bankruptcy administration by curators include the creation of fictitious documents, alteration of authentic documents, manipulation of receipts, asset value manipulation, and the use of false deeds or creditor lists with the intent to deceive or mislead relevant parties. These actions not only harm creditors and disrupt the lawful distribution of bankruptcy assets but also undermine the integrity of the bankruptcy process, causing economic and moral losses. The criminal liability of curators for these acts is absolute and personal, as curators, in addition to violating the provisions of Articles 263, 264, or 266 of the Criminal Code, also betray their pro justitia mandate and fiduciary duties as guarantors (Garantenstellung) of the bankruptcy estate. The intentionality (dolus) of such acts, along with their impact on creditors and the bankruptcy system, aggravates the severity of the misconduct. Therefore, professional independence does not confer immunity; rather, it serves as an aggravating factor, making criminal sanctions necessary to uphold justice, provide deterrence, protect the bankruptcy system, and maintain broader socio-economic stability
PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP KERUSAKAN LINGKUNGAN OLEH PERTAMBANGAN EMAS TANPA IZIN DIKABUPATEN MERANGIN Permata, Hani Alisia; Ismed, Mohamad; Basuki , Basuki
CORPUS JURIS : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): CORPUS JURIS : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/corpusjuris.v1i2.2333

Abstract

Research Objectives: 1) To examine and analyze the handling of illegal gold mining (PETI) perpetrators who cause environmental damage. 2) To examine and analyze law enforcement against PETI perpetrators by prioritizing the restoration of the resulting environmental damage. Research Methods: This research employs a normative legal research method with several approaches: the statute approach, conceptual approach, analytical approach, philosophical approach, and case approach.Research Results: The Indonesian Forum for Environment (WALHI) of Jambi Province stated that as of 2025, the forest area damaged by illegal gold mining in Merangin is estimated to exceed 17,936 hectares. The handling of PETI perpetrators by the Merangin Regency Government, the Police, and the Governor of Jambi has not been optimal, despite the issuance of the Governor of Jambi's Circular Letter No. 414/491/DPMD/2025 regarding PETI. Law enforcement against PETI perpetrators has not yet achieved the three fundamental legal pillars: legal certainty (rechtssicherheit), utility (zweckmassigkeit), and justice (gerechtigkeit). This is due to several factors: a) the legal substance governing PETI, b) the lack of firmness among law enforcement officials, and c) the legal culture of the community regarding PETI activities, while law enforcement facilities remain adequate. Criminal sanctions for PETI are regulated under Article 158 of Law No. 3 of 2020 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining, which carries a maximum penalty of 5 (five) years imprisonment and a maximum fine of IDR 100 billion. Based on Article 80 paragraph 1 letter (a) of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) under Law No. 20 of 2025, PETI perpetrators may pursue Restorative Justice. While Restorative Justice in ordinary crimes involves a settlement between the victim and the perpetrator, in environmental crimes committed by PETI, Restorative Justice can be facilitated through environmental Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), following the doctrine of Christopher Stone. There is a pressing need for government regulations to determine who represents the environment as a legal subject and how fines can be distributed for post-mining reclamation.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 8

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): CORPUS JURIS : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, April 2026 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): CORPUS JURIS : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2025 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): CORPUS JURIS : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Agustus 2025