Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI JISAE (Journal of Indonesian Student Assesment and Evaluation) M A T H L I N E : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika
Nasution, Nurul Rafiqah
Unknown Affiliation
Education Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : M A T H L I N E : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika

 1 
Efforts to Improve Students’ Learning Outcomes Through Collaborative Learning: The Topic of Quadrilaterals Nasution, Nurul Rafiqah; Wahyudin, Wahyudin; Nurlaelah, Elah
Mathline : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 8 No. 3 (2023): Mathline: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/mathline.v8i3.483

Abstract

Collaborative learning has been proven beneficial in mathematics education. This study aims to enhance learning outcomes through collaborative learning, particularly focusing on the topic of quadrilaterals. The research method employed in this study is classroom action research. Data analysis for this research utilizes both quantitative and qualitative data. The research findings indicate that: (1) students' learning outcomes prior to implementing collaborative learning were incomplete as students did not achieve the targeted indicators; (2) students' learning outcomes improved after the implementation of collaborative learning in both Cycle I and Cycle II; (3) the overall class achievement in Cycle I showed an improvement compared to the pre-action phase. Meanwhile, the mastery of learning between Cycle I and Cycle II showed further improvement, becoming even better; (4) observation results of the teacher's activities in facilitating collaborative learning in Cycle I were rated as moderately good, while in Cycle II, they were rated as very good; (5) students' responses during the collaborative learning process in Cycle I were categorized as moderately good, whereas in Cycle II, they were categorized as very good.
Co-Authors Elah Nurlaelah Pratiwi, Yulianti Tri Vicky Dwi Wicaksono Wahyudin Wahyudin