Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Daulat Hukum Jurnal Akta
Maryanto Maryanto
Faculty of Law UNISSULA
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Akta

 1 
Substitute Public Notary Accountability Process The Negligent In Agreement (Case Study In Semarang) Angga Wisnu Firmansyah; Maryanto Maryanto
Jurnal Akta Vol 5, No 3 (2018): September 2018
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v5i3.3262

Abstract

Notary is within the meaning of the Act No. 30 of 2004 concerning Notary in Article 1 is mentioned sense Public notary officials who are authorized to make an authentic agreement and other authorities referred to in this Act. But not forever Notaries can continue to work, in this case, a notary can appoint a replacement to run the temporary Notary and his task. Substitute Notary has the same authority to the notary replaces. With their equality between the legal position with the Substitute Public Notary, then there are no doubts anymore that the agreement made by Notary Substitutes have the same legal force by agreement of Notary. This study is a socio-juridical, then studied at first is by using secondary data library materials and then proceed with research on primary data obtained from the field by taking into account the applicable legal norms connected with the facts found from the study.Keywords: Authority; Notary; the Notary Substitute Responsibility.
Politics Law On Notary Provision Obligation to Implement Principles for Recognizing User Services (PMPJ) Hasrul Hasrul; Maryanto Maryanto
Jurnal Akta Vol 6, No 1 (2019): March 2019
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v6i1.4244

Abstract

This study aimed (1) to determine the relevant arrangements Principle Recognizing User Services, (2) To know the laws granting political liability to the Notary to apply the principle Recognizing User Services.This type of research used by the author is a normative law research. The type of approach used is the approach of law (statute approach), then analyzed using descriptive qualitative analysis.This research resulted in (1) the enactment of Act No. 10 of 2010 on the Prevention and Combating of offense of Money Laundering and Act No. 9 of 2013 on the Prevention and Eradication of the Financing of Terrorism, is a cornerstone of the principal legal for the application of the principle of Identifying Users services and reinforced by Government Regulation No. 43 Of 2015 on the Reporting Parties under the Prevention and Combating of Money Laundering. (2) Political granting legal obligation to apply the principle to the Notary Recognizing User Services is to assist governments to combat money laundering. This is because it turns out in addition to utilizing the financial institution, the money launderers also use certain professions in which the relationship between the professional and his client confidentiality is protected by law or code of conduct.Keyword: Liability Notary; Money Laundering; Principles Recognizing User Services (PMPJ).
Co-Authors Angga Wisnu Firmansyah Hadi Noor Cahyo Hasrul Hasrul