Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
Mufidah Mufidah
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH

 1 
Green Open Space Governance Strategy Against City Development in East Jakarta Mayor Perspective of Law Number 26 of 2007 concerning Spatial Planning Pamungkas Alukman Nulhakim; Siti Ngainnur Rohmah; Abu Tamrin; Mufidah Mufidah
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i2.25602

Abstract

The existence of Law Number 26 of 2007 concerning spatial planning is a shared hope, both for the local government and the community in East Jakarta Municipality. Urban problems arise due to unclear urban spatial planning, as well as inconsistencies in environmental management. The purpose of this study is to explain the importance of managing urban spatial planning as a strategy for designing and developing environmentally friendly areas in East Jakarta Municipality based on Law Number 26 of 2007 concerning Spatial Planning. The research method used is qualitative with a normative and empirical juridical approach. The results of the study found that one of the benchmarks for the application of the Green City concept is the existence of Green Open Space (RTH) in urban areas. Green Open Space in a city must meet a minimum area of 30% of the total land area, with a composition of 20% public green open space and 10% private green open space (Law No. 26 of 2007).
Kekuatan Hukum Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 32 Tahun 2017 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Sengketa Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Melalui Jalur Nonlitigasi Amalia Hasnah; Abdul Qodir; Mufidah Mufidah
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 1, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v1i3.13076

Abstract

AbstractThe Ministry of Law and Human Rights issued a legal product namely Ministerial Regulation Number 32 Year 2017 Concerning Procedure for Dispute Resolution of Legislation through Non-litigation. Whereas in the Ministerial Regulation gives new authority to the Ministry of Law and Human Rights to resolve conflicting laws and regulations disputes. This study uses a type of normative research that is by studying the literature, legislation, books, official documents, and writings of scholars relating to this research. In this study, the method of data collection is done by the study of literature. Data that has been collected and analyzed using descriptive-qualitative methods. The approach used in this research is the statutory approach and conceptual approach. The results of the study can be concluded that in the hierarchy of statutory regulations in Indonesia the status of the Ministerial Regulation is recognized as other regulations in Article 8 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning Formation of Laws and Regulations of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 32 of 2017 has a binding legal force because it is made by an authorized institution/official namely the Minister of Law and Human Rights. And with the issuance of these Regulations become a new alternative for the community to resolve conflicting norms and conflicting regulations outside the court more easily and quickly.Keywords: Legal Strength, Ministerial Regulation, Non-litigation.
Kekuatan Eksekutorial Dalam Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia; Studi Kasus Putusan Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia Jakarta No.801/II/ARB-BANI/2016 Dara Fitryalita; Asep Syarifuddin Hidayat; Mufidah Mufidah
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 1, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v1i1.12006

Abstract

Abstract:The presence of the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) provides new hope in effective and efficient dispute resolution efforts. Nevertheless, BANI has obstacles when carrying out the execution of the decision. This study uses normative juridical methods and literature studies. The results showed that the BANI decision No. 801 / II / ARB-BANI / 2016 had the power of execution because the BANI had registered an authentic copy of the arbitration award at the Registrar of the South Jakarta District Court, so that the decision could be carried out with court assistance or voluntarily by the respondent. However, the implementation encountered an obstacle namely the removal of the object of achievement because of public policy. Other potential obstacles include the applicant's execution and execution refusing because it is not in accordance with the ruling, other than because the ruling decision is considered unclear, the execution of movable property, the existence of resistance, and payment assets are difficult to find.Keywords: Executorial Strength, Arbitration, Decision of the Indonesian National Arbitration Board
Co-Authors Abdul Qodir Abu Tamrin Amalia Hasnah Asep Syarifuddin Hidayat, Asep Syarifuddin Dara Fitryalita Lia Fauziyyah Ahmad Pamungkas Alukman Nulhakim Rizal Maulana Rohmah, Siti Ngainnur