Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Reinterpreting Religious Pluralism in QS. al-Baqarah: 62 (A Method of al-Qaraḍâwî’s Interpretation) Muhammad Kudhori; Muhammad Faiq; Ibnu Farhan
Jurnal Ushuluddin Vol 29, No 2 (2021): July - December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/jush.v29i2.10662

Abstract

QS. al-Baqarah: 62 by some Muslim scholars is used to justify that adherents of all religions in this world will get salvation and go to paradise. Salvation in the hereafter, according to them, is not required to believe in the Prophet Muhammad. This article aimed to re-examine that interpretation that is contrary to the belief of the majority of Muslims, in which one aspect of faith that will save people is a belief in the messengers, including a belief in the Prophet Muhammad. The reinterpretation of QS. al-Baqarah: 62 in this study employed the interpretation method of Yûsuf al-Qaraḍâwî in his book entitled Kayfa Nata‘âmal Ma‘ al-Qur’ân al-‘Az}îm. This article is a library based-study by using content analysis and descriptive-analytic. The result revealed that QS. al-Baqarah: 62 actually deals with the earlier peoples before the Prophet Muhammad. Those who believe in Allah and the Last Day and do good deeds are promised a reward from Allah SWT
BUILDING THE FOUNDATION OF RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE AND COUNTERING RADICALISM IDEOLOGY IN INDONESIA Alfian Qodri Azizi; Muhammad Faiq; Thiyas Tono Taufiq
Jurnal Sosiologi Agama Vol 15, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Program Studi Sosiologi Agama Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/jsa.2021.152-03

Abstract

Human rights enforcement, especially in the aspect of religious freedom in Indonesia, is still unsolved. Violence involving conflicts among religious followers still occurs. It shows that the space for religious freedom is still a critical problem in this country. Indonesia is a multi-cultural country, but a narrow understanding makes plurality the root of hatred and anger. Indeed, diversity will contribute to national development, but on the other hand, it can also trigger horizontal conflicts. This article will unravel the problems that cause religious intolerance and how to overcome the mushrooming of radicalism. This article is qualitative-based research. The data were collected from the library study. The acts of violence caused by wrong religious understanding were analyzed from the Human Rights enforcement, Islamic theology, and socio-juridical viewpoints so that alternative solutions for acts of violence occurring in society, especially among Muslims, can be settled. This study finds that tolerance has its foundations in both religion and positive law in Indonesia. Therefore, any intolerance has no basis, and it will only worsen the image of Islam and make people unsympathetic to religion.
Understanding Radicalists and Fundamentalist Islamic Groups in Indonesia: Ideology and Model of Movement Muhammad Faiq
TASAMUH: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol 13 No 1 (2021): Tasamuh: Jurnal Studi Islam
Publisher : LPPM IAIN Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47945/tasamuh.v13i1.351

Abstract

Abstract: Since the Reformation Era, various Islamic organizations or groups have emerged in Indonesia with different ideologies and movement models, such as Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI), the Indonesian Mujahidin Council (MMI), the Indonesian Muslim Brotherhood, the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI), and Jemaah Islamiyah. Most Indonesian Muslims do not warmly welcome their presence as the spirit of their struggle is not appropriate with the character and culture of the Indonesian people. They often use violence and even terror in struggling for Islam with the reason of amr ma’ruf nahi munkar (enjoining good and forbidding evil). So it is not surprising that the government recently dissolved the HTI and FPI. By using a qualitative approach, this study aims to uncover their ideology and movement model and the ideologies that influence them. From the data obtained from various related literature such as textbooks, journals, and the web, this study finds that these Islamic groups are ideologically influenced by trans-national Islamic groups with fundamentalism and even radicalism characters. They disagree with the Indonesian government system, which is considered secular and incompatible with Islamic values. They often use violence and terror to enforce Islamic shari'ah and even change the NKRI system with the system of Khilafat Islamiyah (Islamic caliphate). Keywords: Radicalist, fundamentalist, Islamic caliphate, shari'ah. Abstrak: Sejak Era Reformasi, berbagai ormas atau kelompok Islam bermunculan di Indonesia dengan ideologi dan model gerakan yang berbeda, seperti Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI), Majelis Mujahidin Indonesia (MMI), Ikhwanul Muslimin Indonesia, Front Pembela Islam (FPI), dan Jemaah Islamiyah. Sebagian besar umat Islam Indonesia tidak menyambut baik kehadiran mereka karena semangat perjuangan mereka tidak sesuai dengan karakter dan budaya masyarakat Indonesia. Mereka sering menggunakan kekerasan bahkan teror dalam memperjuangkan Islam dengan dalih amr ma'ruf nahi munkar. Maka tidak heran jika belakangan ini organisasi tersebut, khususnya HTI dan FPI, dibubarkan oleh pemerintah. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap ideologi dan model gerakan mereka serta ideologi yang mempengaruhinya. Dari data yang diperoleh dari berbagai literatur terkait seperti buku teks, jurnal, dan web, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa kelompok-kelompok Islam tersebut secara ideologis dipengaruhi oleh kelompok-kelompok Islam transnasional dengan karakter fundamentalisme bahkan radikalisme. Mereka tidak setuju dengan sistem pemerintahan Indonesia yang dianggap sekuler dan bertentangan dengan nilai-nilai Islam. Mereka kerap menggunakan kekerasan dan teror untuk menegakkan syari'at Islam bahkan mengubah bentuk NKRI (Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia) dengan sistem Khilafah Islamiyah. Kata kunci: Radikalisme, fundamentalisme, khilafah Islamiyah, syari'at Islam.
Strategi Implementasi Program Desa Bersinar dalam Penanganan Desa Zona Merah Narkoba: Studi Kasus di Desa Ringinarum, Kabupaten Kendal Lisamaulina Safitri; Marsekal Vero Herivo; Vina Ainun Nadhiroh; Muhammad Daffa Fathurrahman; Izyan Nur Faundria; M Amirul Zidan; Asifur Rohman; Muhammad Faiq
Aksi Nyata : Jurnal Pengabdian Sosial dan Kemanusiaan Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Oktober: Aksi Nyata : Jurnal Pengabdian Sosial dan Kemanusiaan
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aksinyata.v1i4.476

Abstract

Handling drug trafficking in rural areas is a serious challenge in Indonesia, especially in villages classified as "red zones". Ringinarum Village, Kendal Regency, is a clear example of a village that faces a significant drug threat. This research aims to analyze in depth the strategy for implementing the Bersinar Village Program in dealing with villages that fall into the red zone category, with a special focus on Ringinarum Village. Using a qualitative approach and case study method, this research evaluates the effectiveness of the Bersinar Village Program in increasing community awareness and participation in rehabilitation efforts. The research results show that this program has succeeded in increasing public awareness of the importance of drug treatment, as well as increasing their active participation in rehabilitation programs. Collaboration between the Kendal Regency National Narcotics Agency (BNN) and village officials is the key to success, with the vital role of village officials as the main driver. This research confirms the importance of adapting programs to local contexts for higher effectiveness in dealing with drugs in rural areas.
Mullā Ṣadrā’s Ontology: The Fundamentality of Existence Over Essence Muhammad Faiq; Ibnu Farhan
KACA (Karunia Cahaya Allah): Jurnal Dialogis Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023): Agustus
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Dakwah Institut Al Fithrah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36781/kaca.v13i2.476

Abstract

One of the critical debates in the philosophical tradition is about existence and essence. The question that arises from this problem is which of the two is more principle or fundamental. Some Muslim philosophers have different points of view regarding this. This article aims to reveal Mullā Ṣadrā's thoughts on the fundamentality of existence. This study is qualitative research with a descriptive and analytical approach. The data were collected from library research. This study found that, in Mullā Ṣadrā’s viewpoint, existence is more fundamental than essence as it causes essence to exist. Mullā Ṣadrā's view leads to the solving of many philosophical problems, such as the problem of causality, Tawhid, the impossibility of the concept of predestination, and dualism, for instance, heaven and hell, world and hereafter, Khaliq and creature, God and universe, material and non-material, transcendent and immanent   Salah satu perdebatan serius dalam tradisi filsafat adalah tentang eksistensi dan esensi. Pertanyaan yang muncul dari persoalan ini adalah mana di antara keduanya yang lebih prinsipil atau fundamental. Para filosof Muslim memiliki pandangan yang berbeda mengenai hal ini. Studi ini bertujuan mengungkap pemikiran Mullā Ṣadrā tentang keutamaan eksistensi. Studi ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif dan analitis. Data dikumpulkan dari studi kepustakaan. Studi ini mengungkap bahwa menurut Mullā Ṣadrā, eksistensi lebih utama/real ketimbang esensi karena eksistensilah yang menjadikan esensi itu ada/wujud. Pandangan Mullā Ṣadrā ini penting untuk pemecahan beberapa persoalan filosofis, seperti masalah kausalitas, tauhid, kemustahilan konsep predestinasi dan dualisme, misalnya surga dan neraka, dunia dan akhirat, khaliq dan makhluk, Tuhan dan alam semesta, material dan non-material, transenden dan imanen.