Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PREMISE LAW JURNAL
ELY YUSNITA
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

 1 
ANALISIS YURIDIS KONSISTENSI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM KASUS MEREK YANG MENGANDUNG UNSUR PERSAMAAN PADA POKOKNYA (Putusan Pengadilan 2011-2012) ELY YUSNITA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 1 (2017): VOLUME I TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (426.296 KB)

Abstract

A registered brand which product has been marketed should get protection according to Law No 15/2001 on Brand. In practice, many brands which are registered later, although it has similar basic elements, will be accepted its registration by the Directorate of Brand; this is contrary to Article 6, paragraphs 1, letters a, b, and c of Law No. 15/2001 on Brand. This thesis used legal normative and descriptive analytic method. Legal remedy can be made by the registered brand holder on the violation against his brand which has similar basic element based on Law No. 15/2001 by filing a complaint to the Court of Commerce on the withdrawal of the product with the brand which has similar basic element or by filing a compensation for the person who has registered the brand which has similar basic element. The Supreme Court’s Ruling in the dispute on a brand which has similar basic element in this research is not consistent toward legal protection against the registered brand. Keywords: Supreme Court’s Ruling, Similar basic Element
Co-Authors