Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan
Moh Yuhdi
Universitas Negeri Malang
Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan

 1 
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KELEMBAGAAN ANTARA KOMISI YUDISIAL DAN MAHKAMAIIAGUNG Moh Yuhdi
Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 24, No 1 (2011): Pebruari 2011
Publisher : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (830.207 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/jppkn.v24i1.5507

Abstract

Abstract: Judicial Commission and Supreme Court are two state institutions mentioned in the Constitution I 945 . They are in Chapter Judicial Authority. Supreme Court is one of the judicial authority implementers. On the other hand, judicial Commission is an institution, which has a control duty. In carrying out the duty, Judicial Commission is authoritive in giving suggestions to the chief ofSupreme Court when giving sanctions to judges. In settling the authority disputes between Judicial Commission and Supreme Court, Judicial Commission initiates a petition of dispute settlement to Constitutional Council. In the petition, Judicial Commission states that there is a constitutional violation on the authority of Judicial Commission in the field of controlling the judges done by Supreme Court. In the petition, Judicial Commission also explains that the existence ofArticle 65 ofGovernment Law No. 24 of 2003 is a fonn of inconsistency to the Constitution 1945. Therefore, material tests of the quo article need to be conducted. Judicial Commission can do those two things at the same time looking at the settlement of petition of constitutional review on Government Law No. I of1987.
Co-Authors