Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jurnal Filsafat
Agus Wahyudi
Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : jurnal filsafat

 1 
Rawls's Property-Owning Democracy: It Is Compromise or A Mixed Economic Regime? Agus Wahyudi
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 13, No 2 (2003)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.31321

Abstract

Tulisan ini mengkaji diskusi tentang demokrasi pemilikian harta-kekayaan dan bagaimana konsep ini berhubungan dengan Kapitalisme Negara Kesejahteraan dan sosialisme.Akar intelektual, bentuk kelembagaan dan justifikasi yang diajukan Rawls akan ditelusuri. Tulisan ini membatah pandangan yang mengatakan bahwa demokrasi pemilikan harta-kekayaan tidak sejalan dengan gagasan Rawls tentang sosialisme liberal. Argumentasinya adalah meskipun gagasan Rawls tentang demokrasi pemilikan harta-kekayaan tidak bisa dipahami tanpa mengaitkannya dengan pengertian Kapitalisme Negara Kesejahteraan dan Sosialisme, Liberal, ide demokrasi pemilikan harta-kekayaan bukanlah kompromi antara sistem ekonomi sosialisme dan sistem ekonomi kapitalisme, namun merupakan rezim ekonomi campuran.
Ideologi Pancasila: Doktrin yang Komprehensif atau Konsepsi Politis? Agus Wahyudi
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 16, No 1 (2006)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.31325

Abstract

The article consisted of controversial discussion on the status Pancasila. Its main problem is whther Pancasila maybe understood as an ideology or not. In this article, the solution in solving the controversial probelm is also offered. The transquality of the controversial status of Pancasila is actually easy to be carried out thourgh ideology and history of thought perspectives. Since the beginning of its history, such concept of ideology has interpreted into two forms of explanations; as a neutral or as a critical concept.The controversy of Pancasila's status, in the other sense is describing another aspect because of such two notions recommended a something a new perspective in elaborating. Pancasila is necessarily needed. It is argued in this article as separation between Pancasila's meaning as comprehensive doctrine with its meaning as a political conception. Finally, in this article, the benefit in expand Pancasila as a political conception is shown more than Pancasila as a comprehensive doctrine.
Filsafat Politik Barat dan Masalah Keadilan: Catatan Kritis atas Pemikiran Will Kymlicka Agus Wahyudi
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 14, No 1 (2004)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.31342

Abstract

Justoce has dominated contemporary debates in the Western political philosophy for the last couple of decades. The book writtern by Will Kymlicka, Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction is a clear example of this development. The book is worth appreciating as this provides deep and extensive discussions of theories of justice.This essay examines Kymlicka's argument, that is even through modern political theories such Ultilitarianism, Liberal Equality, Libertarianism, Marxism, Communitarianism, and Feminism seem to appeal to conflicting values, they have no different foundational values, as they are all egalitarian theories, which is understood in terms of treating people as equals. This essay suggets that there is a truth in this notion and thus such kinds of theory need to be thoroughly studied, even though there is also a need to develop a theory that is roored in a particular context.
DARI MORAL KE EKONOMI: MEMAHAMI AKAR DARI BENTUK PENUNDUKAN DAN PENINDASAN Agus Wahyudi
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 23, No 3 (2013)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.32965

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas gagasan radikalisasi demokrasi yang penting untuk kita pahami agar dapat ditangkap dimensi “ontologi” dan ciri utamanya. Proses radikalisasi demokrasi menghasilkan karakteristik utama, yaitu demokrasi radikal dan plural. Radikalisasi demokrasi mendapatkan justifikasinya untuk merevitalisasi perjuangan sosialis melawan kapitalisme dan mempromosikan perjuangan “gerakan sosial baru” yang demokratik: gerakan perkotaan, ekologi, anti-otoritarianisme, anti-kelembagaan, feminis, anti-rasis, dan (kelompok) minoritas seksual dan regional. Konsep demokrasi memiliki dua nilai fundamental yang instrinsik, yakni: kebebasan dan persamaan.Dalam hasil kajian, didiskusikan bagaimana kedua nilai, kebebasan dan persamaan, ketika berhubungan dengan sistem dan struktur politik, dengan merujuk untuk sebagian dari premis-premis dan praxis demokrasi yang sedang berjalan. Caranya, terutama dengan memusatkan perhatian pada dimensi moral dan ekonomi tempat akar-akar dari beragam bentuk penundukan (subordination) dan penindasan (oppression) tertanam dalam masyarakat kita. Jelas bahwa penundukan dan penindasan adalah antitesa dari semua gagasan tentang kebebasan dan persamaan. Namun demikian, radikalisasi demokrasi tetap mempertahankan prinsip-prinsip etika politik berupa kebebasan dan persamaan dan menuntut prinsip ini dapat diterapkan atau dipraktekkan dengan tepat
RADIKALISASI DEMOKRASI: CATATAN PENGANTAR Agus Wahyudi
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 24, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.34742

Abstract

This article aims to introduce a way of thinking, a perspective, which is expected to be useful for our reading on the complexity of social world in our age, and further to encourage change and transformation of social structures which allow mediate social injustice. We need to understand position of the pespective we will be discussing within the general category of scientific knowledge, before we are able to discuss the notion of democracy radicalization in further detail and why we need to talk about this idea.
Co-Authors