Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Teknik Sipil Jurnal Teknik Sipil Unika Soegijapranata : G-SMART (Geoteknik, Struktur, Manajemen Konstruksi, Sumber Daya Air, Transfortasi) JoDA Journal of Digital Architecture
Hermawan Hermawan
Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Engineering Neuroscience Transportation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : JoDA Journal of Digital Architecture

 1 
LESSON LEARNED: BEST PRACTICE IMPLEMENTASI BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING (BIM) Hermawan Hermawan
JoDA Journal of Digital Architecture Vol 2, No 1: September 2022
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24167/joda.v2i1.5548

Abstract

In the past few decades, Building Information Modeling (BIM) has been widely used worldwide in industry of architecture, engineering dan construction (AEC). This scope is started from construction material manufacturing to construction project. So, this industry, which is one of the most complex industries, requires improvements in time and cost efficiency.. The purpose of this paper is to provide best practice of using BIM in buildings and infrastructure. The research method used in this research is project based evaluation. Project based evaluation is carried out on construction projects, namely building structures which include bored piles, pile cap, plates, shear walls, columns, and beams. The second project based evaluation is the bridge which focuses on structural work in single and double pillars. The results of research on building structures used as project based evaluations show that the difference in volume for each element ranges from 0.03% to 1.13%. with the total difference between conventional recalculation and modeling is around 0.358%. While the modeling in the second project based evaluation showed a volume difference of 12,965.66 kg for single pillar structures and 48,233.51 kg for double pillars. While the conventional method produces a larger estimated volume of 13,482.72 kg for single pillar structures and 49,827.70 kg for double pillars
Co-Authors Anita Carolina Ayub Diski Purnama Budi Setiadi Budi Setiyadi Eric Hansen Irawan Erwin Panucci Ajie Fidelis Prayudha Michael Alan Kristianto