Rachma Indriyani
Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Belli Ac Pacis (jurnal hukum internasional)

KEDUDUKAN HUKUM TAKHTA SUCI DARI PELAKSANAAN BASIC AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE HOLY SEE AND THE PALESTINE LIBERATION ORGANIZATION SEBAGAI BENTUK PENGAKUAN PALESTINA SEBAGAI ENTITAS NEGARA DALAM HUKUM INTERNASIONAL Advent Eden Sihono; Rachma Indriyani
BELLI AC PACIS Vol 3, No 1 (2017): June, 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (368.951 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/belli.v3i1.27468

Abstract

This legal research aims to know the legal position of the Holy See as the subject of international law in recognizing Palestine as a state entity in international law and knowing how the legal consequences of the implementation of the Basic Agreement Between The Holy See and the Palestine Liberation Organization toward the Holy See and Palestine. This legal research is a normative legal research. The legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The topic of legal material settlement is literature study and document study which then analyzed by logical, systematic and juridical. The results of this legal research are: first, the Holy See has the same status as the state in recognizing a state entity, although it has no state instrument. Second, the legal consequences of the Basic Agreement between the Holy See and the Palestine Liberation Organization are the Comprehensive Agreement which has three important points, namely the Palestinian Authority granting freedom of religion and rule to the Catholic laity, and assisting in the establishment of the church both legally and financially, the Palestinian Authority gives protection for sites of status quo and other holy sites which deserve special protection, and provide autonomous legal status and tax exemption, formal recognition of the Palestinian Authority as a state by the Holy See.
LEGITIMASI PENGGUNAAN CRUISE MISSILE SEBAGAI INTERSTATE WEAPON DALAM PERANG UDARA I Made Dwi Abiyoga Paramartha; Prasetyo Hadi Purwandoko; Rachma Indriyani
BELLI AC PACIS Vol 2, No 1 (2016): June, 2016
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (247.695 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/belli.v2i1.27444

Abstract

Cruise missile proliferation on air warfare allows states party of armed conflict to launch its weapon from outside the conflict zone over the territory of non adversary state. On the other hand, as a form of armaments development, cruise missile is still demanded because of its efficiency. Therefore the use legitimacy of cruise missile as interstate weapon in air warfare is a mechanism to ensure adversary parties to act under international humanitarian law for the use of cruise missiles. This research contains two main substances, first that legitimacy is necessary because although the lack of rules on air warfare today,  humanitarian law still obliges warring ordinances to be enforced impartially. Second, the use of the principle of military necessity, humanity, and chivalry answer the needs of a country to use cruise missile as a modern weapon and on the other hand to ensure minimizing the casualties.