Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Sains Teknologi dan Lingkungan (JSTL) Seminar Nasional Lahan Suboptimal
Rian Syafni
Universitas Sriwijaya
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Computer Science & IT Public Health Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Sains Teknologi dan Lingkungan (JSTL)

 1 
Penilaian Uji Konsistensi Dokumen AMDAL yang disahkan oleh Komisi Penilai AMDAL Provinsi Sumatera Selatan: The Assessment of EIA Document Consistency Aspect Validated by EIA Assessment Commission of South Sumatra Province Rian Syafni; Dedik Budianta; Moh. Rasyid Ridho
JURNAL SAINS TEKNOLOGI & LINGKUNGAN Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): JURNAL SAINS TEKNOLOGI & LINGKUNGAN
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jstl.v8i1.291

Abstract

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is one of the instruments to prevent environmental pollution and/or damage (Undang-Undang 32, 2009). Success in preventing environmental pollution is closely related to the quality of the EIA document, especially the quality of the consistency aspects, such as the consistency between the hypothetical significant impact and the initial environmental baseline, the estimated magnitude of the impact, the environmental management and monitoring plan. Therefore, it is very necessary to assess the consistency of the EIA Document in the Province of South Sumatra. This research aims to assess the consistency test of the EIA Document approved by the EIA Assessment Commission of South Sumatra Province. This study used descriptive qualitative method. The research sample was taken using a total sampling technique, all EIA Documents that have been assessed by the EIA Assessment Commission of South Sumatra Province between 2018-2020 and already have an Environmental Feasibility Decree totaling 12 (twelve) documents are used as research samples. The results showed that 5 (five) documents (42%) had very good consistency,               6 (six) documents (50%) had good consistency and 1 (one) document (8%) ) had a bad consistency.
Co-Authors Dedik Budianta Moh. Rasyid Ridho